there's nothing wrong with speculation + is all anyone's been doing all game whys it suddenly badI thought we established that this is something we do not know? o 3o
Or a deadline would be nice.also we've pretty much ground to a halt now there's nothing left in this day so if we could get the last few votes in that'd be sexy
unvote
vote Jolteon
Okay, Notty cleared himself in my eyes. Poking Jolteon.
Okay
unvote
vote catgirl
Day 2:Okay.
unvote
vote Jolteon
And the way he reacts to night deathsWell Myusername won't claim he is mafia - third party serial killer can be bad for town too.
vote Myusername
Day 2:Wow there are 2 or 3 killing roles running around!
And how he initially claims to be vanilla (or 'blue') then claims to be a town PRGlad to see Jolteon/Samlen being dead :D
Well since there was table, I'm blue townie with no night actions.
Notme plsWell I have power role but I can use it only when lynched.
My name is Sofia Kustova and I'm Mad Gunwoman.
This is Townie role.
This is actually the best reasoning I've seen for us to lynch raxo honestly. Even if he is town PR he'll be able to try and shoot a mafia (unless he gets mad, game throws and shoots a townie on purpose pls don't) if he isn't then even better. Considering the fact that people have mentioned before (as have I) that raxo doesn't really add much info in day periods I say it would make sense to call it a policy lynch as wellRight now I am tempted to vote Notme because of the reasons he gives (almost non-existent) for voting for people
Day 1:
Day 2:
And the way he reacts to night deaths
Day 1:
Day 2:
And how he initially claims to be vanilla (or 'blue') then claims to be a town PR
Notme pls
We could always lynch raxo and ask him (although it's improbable he'll listen) to shoot ooglie although this could remove 2 townies which is not optimal. Besides I'm trying to get something to happen since no one seems to want to vote anymore apparentlyUmm no we should lynch ooglie today, why split the votes further
Don't see how this is getting anything to happen. We had 5 votes on ooglie. For a lynch to be reached, we need at least 9.We could always lynch raxo and ask him (although it's improbable he'll listen) to shoot ooglie although this could remove 2 townies which is not optimal. Besides I'm trying to get something to happen since no one seems to want to vote anymore apparently
Exactly. I've wanted to switch votes, and even unvote altogether, but that would only be taking us further from the goal.Umm no we should lynch ooglie today, why split the votes further
no your reasons have been spread everywherealready did like three of those and busy irl just search my post history
i dont think priz would be able to control how much cat is able to post??remember the discussion yesterday about how cat hasn't posted often? or expressed much opinion, especially regarding ooglie?
maybe censoring has to do with that. it'd fit the theme, anyway.
no but cat can???i dont think priz would be able to control how much cat is able to post??
confirms reports!blocks reports
when?isn't obligated to tell truth about stolen reports
nice one!scum
can a censorer change someones actionscat claimed to watch ender who conveniently died n1 and she apparently did not actually get a watch result
i think that quite literally everyone knows that my playstyle includes thisdefends self frantically
ability to confirm roles (e.g. this one shot PR is a liar, this person isn't receiving the information they claimed to have, etc)claims censoring is townsided somehow
i don't see why this is a reason to vote mefound potatoes on cat despite this having literally nothing to do with his role
do i have a choice in what flavour text i getclaims to have "visited" cat despite supposed flavor being wiretapping, the action itself seems to be him physically taking the documents and redacting them