Hmm, along with your use of caps as Hk pointed out
??? my comment against inf was how in every mafia game when he's scum he starts making either long posts in caps making silly reasons to justify himself and then shifts suspicion to someone else: that's his defense style in the past, not mine (you're free to go back to other games and check!)
and the fact you were the first to vote against
Infected_alien8_ you have made me more suspicious of you.
^ the guy who starts the voting on an innocent person so that the Mafia get an extra 'free' kill?
again you say about me being the first vote, but how does that make me suspicious?
i voted inf in the beginning since he was genuinely suspicious with his weird word choices and, ironically, odd obsession with you
now, IF I WAS MAFIA (so noone tries this soft claiming stuff on me!!), why would i not hop onto the voting of either you or mulbery at the time which were, at that point, going to be either of the final lynches
note that at one point i even unvoted inf and switched to you (admittedly for like 2 seconds since i didn't understand what inf was getting across) when he said he had investigated you
and if you're accusing me for voting on inf, take a look at the other five including you who essentially hammered the lynch
also voting twice for the most active person in chat, who is more likely to help the town and push for information.
activity =/= allignment
active people aren't necessarily going to help the town more than someone who is quieter and only posts when they have something to contribute (e.g. mulb last game)
scum can take the limelight for the exact misconception that people who lurk are instantly evil, making themselves seem town (although this is pretty much WIFOM logic and will get nowhere)
not to say activity is bad since it does help obviously, but i'm not gonna hold back on my suspicions just because someone posts a lot