even if she's not how does lynching notty helpBecause they dont think notty is rev.
If you think me killing Ender will make you lose then why don't you give me every incentive not to kill him :thinking:We lose if she kills ender too o m g
my brain HURTS.
Hunter pointed out 0 flaws in the plan, he spent 90% of his time spewing out random, irrelevant facts about the game like a train announcer and 10% ignoring my points and saying 'but most people don't want to do it anyway' whenever I brought up a valid point>Supports notty's autocracy plan and laps up all of her "facts" despite people (including proven townies aka hunter) pointing out all the flaws and lies in them.
>Remains adamant she isn't scum cus "muh vibes xd"
>Tries to convince people not to lynch her
>Support of autocracy plan very much likely influenced the installation of a dictator which threw the game
>Remains adamant that we wouldn't have/shouldn't have lynched notty
>Ignores all my points against notty and also going autocracy I have supported with actual solid math, claiming they are wrong or just not responding to them.
Waaaaaaaaaaah why don't people trust me.
And stop being /modest/ you know as well as I do behind notty you're the most influential mafia player which is why if you are town you have to make sure you're not leading everybody off a cliff.
If "rev" kills a townie tonight the game is essentially unwinnable.so you're saying this game is essentially unwinnable and whatever hope there is to win via using the rev should just be thrown out the window and we should lynch the rev (despite the rev doing the thing you dont want them to do tonight, unblocked, prior to being lynched) just since LUL rev is evil or notty is mafia XD
Boy, I've got a list for you(from most suspicious to least suspicious)To everyone against a notty lynch:
Who is a better lynch target?
whyIf "rev" kills a townie tonight the game is essentially unwinnable.
I don't understand what you fail to see about that.
If they don't we can win with their help or without it. But neither of us can win if she kills a townie.
that wouldn't stop the mafia killWell if she aint rev, she probably a dessenter. Im guessing a powerful dessenter aswell.
Hunter did I take you back to notty's flawed math supporting her autocracy plan which hunter posted a pretty detailed break down of how her math was wrong and you, with 0 mathematical understanding just disregarded it as incorrect as you did when I showed you that going autocracy tonight had a 43.75% of us losing the game.Hunter pointed out 0 flaws in the plan, he spent 90% of his time spewing out random, irrelevant facts about the game like a train announcer and 10% ignoring my points and saying 'but most people don't want to do it anyway' whenever I brought up a valid point
I have responded to this 10000000000000000000 timesHunter did I take you back to notty's flawed math supporting her autocracy plan which hunter posted a pretty detailed break down of how her math was wrong and you, with 0 mathematical understanding just disregarded it as incorrect as you did when I showed you that going autocracy tonight had a 43.75% of us losing the game.
IN FACT THIS ISNT EVEN A GOOD COMPARISON BECAUSE THEY WERENT RELATED LIKE THATI have responded to this 10000000000000000000 times
IF I SAY THERE'S A 90% CHANCE OF SELECTING A INSTEAD OF B, MEANING A 10% OF CHOOSING B, AND THEN REALIZE OOPS THERE'S A 70% CHANCE OF SELECTING A INSTEAD, THAT MEANS THERE'S STILL ONLY A 30% CHANCE OF CHOOSING B
AKA A IS STILL BETTER
also w h a t.Yes because it's stupid to lynch her
show me using maths of the faction numbers how we'd be in a great positionalso w h a t.
If we had gone democracy night 1 and lynched notty it town would be in a great position regardless of her being rev or dissenter.
w h a tIF I SAY THERE'S A 90% CHANCE OF SELECTING A INSTEAD OF B, MEANING A 10% OF CHOOSING B, AND THEN REALIZE OOPS THERE'S A 70% CHANCE OF SELECTING A INSTEAD, THAT MEANS THERE'S STILL ONLY A 30% CHANCE OF CHOOSING B
AKA A IS STILL BETTER
YOU AND HUNTER WERE LIKE WAAA NOTTY'S PERCENTAGE WAS WRONGw h a t
d o e s
t h i s
e v e n
M E A N
????????
I hate to break it you inf but that isn't how maths works.YOU AND HUNTER WERE LIKE WAAA NOTTY'S PERCENTAGE WAS WRONG
NOBODY CARES
IF HER SCENARIO WAS LESS OF A CHANCE THAN SHE ANTICIPATED, THAT MEANT THE ALTERNATIVE WAS ALSO LESS OF A CHANCE
SHE EVEN DID THE MATH FOR IT
except it literally isI hate to break it you inf but that isn't how maths works.
do you support a notty lynchWhy is nobody pushing those people to be lynched if you all think they're guilty?
These past ten pages have been going back and forth on the notty issue, but everyone who does not want notty to be lynched(with valid reasons) never really pushes an alternative. It's like they're trying to run out a clock.
I'm not saying everybody who supports notty is scum, that would be stupid. But to everyone defending notty, I urge you to quit talking about the same tired old topic and offer a better solution to lynching notty
I love how you're trying to explain year 7 maths to me.if i get a flower worth £100 and another flower worth £50
and then ohno I realize that I'm in a different country where the £ is worth less so actually here the 1st flower is worth £50, the second flower is now worth £25
aka first flower is still worth more
aka 'percentage was wrong' isn't a valid reason for dismissing the 1st option
thats wrong, the factor she got wrong affected both plans, go back and read itI love how you're trying to explain year 7 maths to me.
Dude A) the different plans were independent and B) even if they weren't in probability if one variable goes down the other variables go up if you see what I mean rather than both going down