Do me a favour - quote - quote where exactly you pointed out these lies of mine. The reason why I "died down" on defensiveness was because we obviously need Roob's claim to move from now on, and of course you take this silence of mine as a retreat and am pushing me as a result. Wonderful.
Spaghetti Mafia - Game Complete
- Thread starter TheWeakGuy48_
- Start date
- Status
Also I think another scenario is:
Both roleblocker and Roob visited but Okx was watching:
Result: Both would show on report
I'm pushing Choco hard as it makes no sense for Cop to claim that early, so it's quite obvious he's lying as theres no 3P/fool
Scenario 4 and also:
People targeted Choco but you're lying
Result: you're lying about people targeting Choco
People targeted Choco but you targeted someone else and is lying about who you truly targeted
Result: Same as scenario above
Now, I trust you way more than Choco so I'm gonna trust Scenario 1,2,3 as being the most likely under Occam's razor
Votecount
Aqua: [1/6] Chocofox
Chocofox: [4/6] Aqua, Duke, Okx, Rune
Not voting: [7] Alisha, Betapanda, Enderfive, Roobarb Pie, TehBrian and Unsual_Dood
6 votes are required for a no-lynch.
6 votes are required for a lynch.
Deadline in 93 hours and 30 minutes!
Aqua: [1/6] Chocofox
Chocofox: [4/6] Aqua, Duke, Okx, Rune
Not voting: [7] Alisha, Betapanda, Enderfive, Roobarb Pie, TehBrian and Unsual_Dood
6 votes are required for a no-lynch.
6 votes are required for a lynch.
Deadline in 93 hours and 30 minutes!
You're basing your reasoning off something which is less viable than what Roob could say at this point. It's so ridiculous I don't even know what to say of it.
Since you honestly haven't really pointed out my lies yet, I'll do you a favour by pointing out yours. Let's talk.
Contradiction #1
First off, you start by saying that if a majority wasn't reached, a lynch would not go through. I went on and pointed this out:
I explained that it was because the signups thread was unclear and it said that the player with the most lynches would get lynched. I was not expecting it to include the no-lynch vote, which is why I claimed last minute to get the votes off me because I'm the cop. For your reference, Weak went on to clarify this too:
After my explanation, you went on to say this:
So you went on from saying that it's "common sense" that it would default to a no-lynch when it wouldn't, as pointed out in the signups threads.
Contradiction #2
Once I pointed out what you said, you immediately went on saying that it wouldn't work in my favour of defense, then went on to talk about how I was being "extremely defensive" without actually pointing out where I actually contradicted myself or lied.
Contradiction #3
I would submit a fake report? I said right off the bat that I did not get a result from my investigation last night. I never submitted any report. Maybe my memory is failing me, or maybe I have amnesia.
Contradiction #4
You said you being aggressive is "literally (your) usual playstyle", and implicated us to check through previous games which you played in. I did that, and yeah, you are pretty aggressive, so I'll agree with that.
However, during Day 1, you kept quiet the entire time.
Contradiction #5
Okx claimed he saw nobody visiting me.
I claimed I was roleblocked.
After saying this, we should verify this with Rune right? Instead you say this:
Right now the best course of action is to wait for Roob to actually claim.
Actually it's getting late where I am and I'm going to head off - it's tiring pointing out the continuous lies in your arguments but I'll just quote this.
This is a Mafia wagon the Mafia is trying to use on me to get me, as the Town cop, lynched. If you have the decency to not obfuscate this, I would prefer it people read the suggestions which are actually pointed out here.
Sorry some of the quotes messed up there in my post - the formatting here is really terrible and if people want me to make a repost please let me know.
I have no way of defending myself when I'm sleeping so I'm begging the Town not to be so gullible to a Mafia wagon that's playing out here.
I have no way of defending myself when I'm sleeping so I'm begging the Town not to be so gullible to a Mafia wagon that's playing out here.
Contradiction 1 isn't a contradiction, it's me stating that it's common sense that no-lynch works that way; and that there is usually two systems at play when it comes to EscRestart mafia. In the signup sheet, it states that if there's two players with the same vote count, then no-lynch occurs but it doesn't state that no-lynch works like that because it's a common sense rule which you COULD HAVE CLARIFIED IN GAME BY ASKING THE HOST
Contradiction 2 is you trying to split off contradiction 1 into two separate contradictions, when it's basically you repeating it. In fact, '2' was me stating that a common mistake with inexperienced mafia is to become too defensive to try to make up for the fact that they have messed up in some sort of way or to remove suspicion. Therefore, they do the opposite and bring on more suspicion. You were a textbook example as the instant day 2 started, you tried to make up for the mistake and as I continued to pressure you; you were not able to calm down with the over-defensiveness. Instead you became silent to stop yourself making more mistakes
Contradiction 3 is you submitting a fake report because you're not the actual report. Let's look at this closely. Okx is saying you were not roleblocked as the roleblocker didn't visit you last night (hooker). Therefore you were not roleblocked according to Okx. If you didn't go for a report, you would have said so but you didn't. So therefore you would have either guilty or not guilty report and not a report as you stated. These conflict with each other
Contradiction 4 is not really a contradiction, as you yourself admit that my playstyle is consistent. So instead you have used my silence on the first part of Day 1 as proof, when I was still more active than some people.
Contradiction 5 again isn't a contradiction:
Either Okx is telling the truth and you're lying OR you're telling the truth and that Okx is lying. Also, if Roob did save you; he would have had to visit you. Therefore Roob wouldn't have saved you if both were telling the truth and therefore you are lying or:
Okx is lying
Roob is lying
Now, I trust Okx way more than you as his report backs up my logic. It's up to Roob now and I'm hoping he proves you wrong; like Okx and I did :)
So Roob can do three things:
Support my case, in which we can vote Choco.
Neutral, in which we can vote choco I guess?
Or not support my case, in which case both Roob and Choco are mafia. Even if I get voted, we still know two mafia.
Support my case, in which we can vote Choco.
Neutral, in which we can vote choco I guess?
Or not support my case, in which case both Roob and Choco are mafia. Even if I get voted, we still know two mafia.
I want to hear from Roob on who he protected
Also at this point I'm considering myself a vote for Choco in spirit, I don't want to vote yet since it leaves it open for a hammer, and I want everyone to speak so we don't miss any vital information
I still don't trust Rune though
Also at this point I'm considering myself a vote for Choco in spirit, I don't want to vote yet since it leaves it open for a hammer, and I want everyone to speak so we don't miss any vital information
I still don't trust Rune though
Enderfive
sarcasm incarnate
uh excuse me what the fuck is going on
why are people being complete fucking sheep suddenly
why has the real cop not claimed if choco is lying
why are we voting for an un-cc'd cop claim within the first twelve hours of a day phase when everyone haven't even talked yet
for that matter, why on earth did we nolynch yesterday
i have so many questions
why are people being complete fucking sheep suddenly
why has the real cop not claimed if choco is lying
why are we voting for an un-cc'd cop claim within the first twelve hours of a day phase when everyone haven't even talked yet
for that matter, why on earth did we nolynch yesterday
i have so many questions
- Status