....well yea, cus you switched the implication of the normative from town to mafia....?saying 'i cant see them misreading their pm even as mafia' technically makes no more sense!
i meant town*....well yea, cus you switched the implication of the normative from town to mafia....?
saying 'i can't see them misreading their pm even as town' reads as "despite the fact they're town (a situation where it is more likely you would misread your role pm), I cannot see them misreading their pm"....well yea, cus you switched the implication of the normative from town to mafia....?
youre not and you just contradicted what you said earlier about town and maf being equally likely to misreadsaying 'i can't see them misreading their pm even as town' reads as "despite the fact they're town (a situation where it is more likely you would misread your role pm), I cannot see them misreading their pm"
I hope I'm making sense here.
An analogy would besaying 'i can't see them misreading their pm even as town' reads as "despite the fact they're town (a situation where it is more likely you would misread your role pm), I cannot see them misreading their pm"
I hope I'm making sense here.
I was saying at BEST mafia and town are equally likely to - but I think it's a fair assumption due to how mafia works, you're going to pay more care to your role pm as mafia than town. If you couldn't make the distinction at all then it wouldn't work either-way because you'd be right, there wouldn't be a deviation from the norm that oogs implying with his sentence.youre not and you just contradicted what you said earlier about town and maf being equally likely to misread
I can't even remember their claim but considering I think the scum are in Weak, Auctioneer(Stranger) and You/Oog they are town by elimination for now. + I don't want HK to have it since I suspect they're dying tonightNottykitten you also said about giving it to skele, why skele out of everyone?
exactly it's a deviation - altho in my analogies I used a past and current description (sunny day and wanting hot dogs) where as Notty being town would be an assumption."i cant see them misreading it even as town" would imply its more believable theyd misread it as town vs mafia
those 'analogies' are about 'even though youd think it was likely, it didnt happen'
i guess but this assumes oog thinks its more likely youll misread as town vs scum instead of thinking he probs just didnt write in perfect englishI was saying at BEST mafia and town are equally likely to - but I think it's a fair assumption due to how mafia works, you're going to pay more care to your role pm as mafia than town. If you couldn't make the distinction at all then it wouldn't work either-way because you'd be right, there wouldn't be a deviation from the norm that oogs implying with his sentence.
But I think it's a fair assessment that people take more care when they're scum than when they do town, thus again why can't made more sense to me as it could work, than can which just didn't work in the sentence structure.
This makes no senseexactly it's a deviation - altho in my analogies I used a past and current description (sunny day and wanting hot dogs) where as Notty being town would be an assumption.
Both deviate for the implied meaning.
Notty being town would mean she 'could' misread her role pm - but despite this fact, I still don't believe her.
It being a sunny day implies it's good weather for ice cream - but despite this, I don't want one.
They're not exact, but it's an analogy dude, it doesn't have to be a perfect 1:1
If your claim is real how would I be scum considering we shared so much about our claims and I claimed first with no insight or mechanical knowledge that would support it?I can't even remember their claim but considering I think the scum are in Weak, Auctioneer(Stranger) and You/Oog they are town by elimination for now. + I don't want HK to have it since I suspect they're dying tonight
yh but my point was that theres no reason to think notty was more likely to misread it as town vs mafiaexactly it's a deviation - altho in my analogies I used a past and current description (sunny day and wanting hot dogs) where as Notty being town would be an assumption.
Both deviate for the implied meaning.
Notty being town would mean she 'could' misread her role pm - but despite this fact, I still don't believe her.
It being a sunny day implies it's good weather for ice cream - but despite this, I don't want one.
They're not exact, but it's an analogy dude, it doesn't have to be a perfect 1:1
I'm not questioning your role right now, I'm questioning your morals.If your claim is real how would I be scum considering we shared so much about our claims and I claimed first with no insight or mechanical knowledge that would support it?
why cant your real role be a scum roleIf your claim is real how would I be scum considering we shared so much about our claims and I claimed first with no insight or mechanical knowledge that would support it?
Well yea but like I said earlier... that's what I would expect oog to think, just as I'd expect you to think it.i guess but this assumes oog thinks its more likely youll misread as town vs scum instead of thinking he probs just didnt write in perfect english
Hey I defended you against infs bad argument about stranger, even though I know you're scum!!!I'm not questioning your role right now, I'm questioning your morals.
it wasnt a bad argument youre just bad!Hey I defended you against infs bad argument about stranger, even though I know you're scum!!!
Because if I was scum then how would I know about:why cant your real role be a scum role
what do you meanBecause if I was scum then how would I know about:
the 3 coins day 0 thing
Getting a monetary cut based off the auction house (altho I suppose this could have been a guess but at the time it really wasn't obvious how the auctions would work - especially since I had no idea you, unu and stranger were auctioneers.)
I asked for proof within contextit wasnt a bad argument youre just bad!
so because you were too lazy to just click on the quotes and see that i was asking 'why' my argument was bad ?I asked for proof within context
you supplied quotes
from those quotes I inferred notty was right
then you said "No there's other context that makes me right"
So I gave up, I don't even care if you were right. In a debate you lost the argument right there.
Why would a scum role get a cut of the auction house when their whole way of getting money is killing people??? Also why would a scum role just get money from the auction house but a town role would get money form the auction house AND a scum black market?what do you mean
im saying why cant the role you claimed be your real scum one and you just claimed it since its not exactly inherently scummy sounding