/trade

[Da Jinks]

This is for my idea of /trade (probably been thought of before, didnt check that out...).

OK, so with /trade here is what ya do. Say player "DaJinks" wants to get a shotgun but not wanna spend any points. He can do this:

"DaJinks used /trade @Marnixxie"
"@Marnixxie: DaJinks would like to make a trade with you."
"Will you accept?"
"Marnixxie used /accept"
"DaJinks used /tradeoffer 2 pistols for 1 shotgun"
"@Marnixxie: DaJinks has offered you 2 pistols for 1 shotgun"
"Accept or Decline?"
"Marnixxie used /accept"
"@Marnixxie, @DaJinks: Trade has been completed."

Then Marnixxie would get 2 of DaJinks pistols and Jinks would get 1 of Marn's shotguns.

Any ideas?

 

[superstein]

This would be good if the upgrades are exclusive to the weapon but still, you can just get 2 pistols and sell 1 shotgun or something if you were Marn. But it would be listed in the inv as "DaJinks' pistols" and it would be weird since you could maybe use it first, like big-tnt or nuke or use a different block. Idk, though, could be cool but a bit impractical.

 

[DarthLego5679]

I don't know exactly why, but this sets me on edge. It doesn't seem right, plus people will spam others with /trade @<NAME>

 

[Mccuish]

this is just my opinion but i don't really think we should have to trade weapons just to get other weapons

 

[Kloud_Strife]

Seems a bit pointless, and who would honestly want to trade smaller amounts of points than what the thing actually costs?

 

[Marnixxie]

WHAAAAAA, I JUST LOST 5 POINTS D:

 

[peckypeck903]

...Sell 2 pistols, kill 1 person, get the shotgun.

 

[balloon98]

Not to mention we would have to have a lot of commands coded in for if we did implement this.

 

[VeryHighUp]

Plus it wouldn't be used much since buying weapons is quicker.

 

[Super_Goku]

we have also got the /sell (amount) (weapon) command the the sell commands seems more usefull to me