In a hole in the ground...

[Mikey]

There lived a Hobbit.

December 14, 2012 - The Hobbit 'An Unexpected Journey' hits theaters!

Are you going to see it? If you have seen it what do you think about it? Will the trilogy be a failure or a wild success?
Feel free to post your opinions on the movie/trilogy!

I personally thought it was a magnificent start, I am aware of its slow start at the, but it is inevitable to not have one, in the book there is certainly a slow start as well - they want to introduce the plot/characters fluently and clearly. The movie about half way in was constant fun - and typically, the first movie in a trilogy/saga have a slow start to introduce the expedition. I feel as if this will follow the Lord of the Rings path where the movies get better in numerical order, if that makes sense. (1 being the least best, 3 being the best.)

P.S: I typed this up at 4am - I just saw it and I am quite the tired fellow.

 

[Shinyshark]

Welcome to BBC News! The new movie 'the hobbit' *starts leaning on his elbows* is coming out soon. Do you know anyone that has seen it? Perhaps you could share your opinion on it? Do you know someone that lives in your country that will see it? Share your opinion on this movie at www.bbc.com/thehobitthemovieopinions and we'll read them through.

 

[Jeff0521]

I do plan on seeing it. :)

I hope it's as good as ansoro2112 says it is. .-.

 

[Qube]

Gonna go see it tomorrow \o/ I'm a little worried about the fact that they make three movies out of one book, i feel like its a bit too much to be honest, nonetheless, i'm looking forward too it!

 

[gay vampire]

I've been waiting forever for this movie. I WILL see it. If I don't, I'll go on an extreme murderous rampage.

 

[Ansoro2112]

I saw it Wednesday at Midnight. The movie was AMAZING! I loved it! But they are gonna do 2 parts. The movie is 3 hours long.
But it was pretty good!

 

[JKangaroo]

They're making MORE movies to follow this one?!!!
And I thought they would try to fit it all in this one movie. How silly of me.
I'm hoping to go see it soon. Just finished re-watching and reading the Lord of the Rings trilogy; hoping the movie is just as good as the book was.

 

[Pikmon2]

The 48 fps of the movies kinda bugs me a lot, but still, probably gonna see it. It probably could have been done in that 3 hours though...

 

[zezmi]

I watched it last night :) I think it was good and followed the story line pretty well, the fast frame rate got annoying at some parts but it was mostly ok, I am really looking forward to part 2!

 

[ZombiePineapple]

I probably won't be going to see it but what I know and from what ansoro described and others it could be a candidate for movie of the year (although there are others that also deserve this honor or if some category exists)

 

[Dess]

IF YOU SPOIL THE MOVIE GODDAMNIT I WILL END YOU

 

[Jayfeather]

The 48 fps of the movies kinda bugs me a lot, but still, probably gonna see it. It probably could have been done in that 3 hours though...

I watched it last night :) I think it was good and followed the story line pretty well, the fast frame rate got annoying at some parts but it was mostly ok, I am really looking forward to part 2!

What's the difference? I'm so curious about this - I'd think it would look better :/

IF YOU SPOIL THE MOVIE GODDAMNIT I WILL END YOU

Dumbledore diez

 

[digi]

If you couldn't tell by my signature, I'm here to tell you right now that I am ecstatic about The Hobbit.
But, why? Whyyyy?! I don't get it? I live right next door to the country that the Hobbit was filmed in and we have to wait till Boxing Day. ;_;

 

[zezmi]

What's the difference? I'm so curious about this - I'd think it would look better :/

Dumbledore diez

well the 48 frames per second makes it look blurry when it's moving sometimes, and it looks really fast and makes most poeple feel queasy after watching it for about an hour. But like I said it's still really good :)

 

[Jayfeather]

well the 48 frames per second makes it look blurry when it's moving sometimes, and it looks really fast and makes most poeple feel queasy after watching it for about an hour. But like I said it's still really good :)

Was it in a certain level of dimension, or were the frames global throughout the D's of 2 and 3?

 

[Pikmon2]

What's the difference? I'm so curious about this - I'd think it would look better :/

Its to make it look smoother. It basically looks live action or recorded with a home video camera. Its REALLY weird for the first time.

 

[zezmi]

Was it in a certain level of dimension, or were the frames global throughout the D's of 2 and 3?

well, after about 28 frames per second, the human can not tell the difference.

 

[Mikey]

Just watch it in 2d on 28fps.