Journey to Elysium Discussion Thread

LISTINGS09

LISTINGS09

Ain't afraid of no ghost
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
366
Reaction score
606
30 20 15 10 5 10 2 1
Zack27999/Moonstar2 said:
I can't login without crashing each time. Each time I crash, I get the report saying the cause is "rendering entity in world". My mods are all updated, my .jar is fine, everything. It only happened once in Buildbox, and keeps happening here?
Click to expand...
Same issue here... It's optifine/rei + maybe some GPU combination (or whatever), just use a default jar until you're out of the start town and then swap back...
 
shadowdragoon66

shadowdragoon66

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
70
Reaction score
101
10 5 2 1
I have Rei's and optifine on and I have no problems. Also, can we make mod requests here or will there be a thread posted at some point that we can use. I was hoping to use the sign tags mod or have it added. It allows html type tags to be added to signs to have a digital clock, the coordinates, or the biome to be displayed on the sign when you use the proper code.
 
Friendy

Friendy

SMP Overlord & Events Manager
Donor
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
2,528
Reaction score
1,402
20 25 30
Marnixxie Is it possible to modify the queue system so that if there is 3 spaces available, the first 3 in the queue can enter the server without the first person in queue having to enter first? As it'd be very helpful, especially when you have to wait for them to join or time out.
 
P

Prizyms

あんたバカァ～！？
Mafia Host
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
2,899
20 30 20 15 10 10 5 2 1
AngelWV said:
Marnixxie Is it possible to modify the queue system so that if there is 3 spaces available, the first 3 in the queue can enter the server without the first person in queue having to enter first? As it'd be very helpful, especially when you have to wait for them to join or time out.
Click to expand...
If the first 3 players in the queue becomes a free-for-all for slots, doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of the queue in the first place? Also, players who have previously disconnected have a 60 second window in which to reconnect, so this 'slot allowance' would suddenly become a lot more complicated to code.
 
Friendy

Friendy

SMP Overlord & Events Manager
Donor
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
2,528
Reaction score
1,402
20 25 30
Prizyms said:
If the first 3 players in the queue becomes a free-for-all for slots, doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of the queue in the first place? Also, players who have previously disconnected have a 60 second window in which to reconnect, so this 'slot allowance' would suddenly become a lot more complicated to code.
Click to expand...
You're not understanding what I mean. I meant that users would still have to queue. For example, Blue and Red log out and there is now 5 spaces free, two of which have 1 minute slots. Green and Turquoise wish to join as there is 3 available slots left, however Orange is afk in the queue so Green and Turquoise have to wait for Orange to come back and log in, or time out of the queue. If they could log in when the 3 slots were open, then the problem would be solved. Users will still have to queue, but if there is 2 slots, the first two users in the queue can join. If there is 8 slots, the first 8 users in the queue can join.
 
P

Prizyms

あんたバカァ～！？
Mafia Host
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
2,899
20 30 20 15 10 10 5 2 1
AngelWV said:
You're not understanding what I mean. I meant that users would still have to queue. For example, Blue and Red log out and there is now 5 spaces free, two of which have 1 minute slots. Green and Turquoise wish to join as there is 3 available slots left, however Orange is afk in the queue so Green and Turquoise have to wait for Orange to come back and log in, or time out of the queue. If they could log in when the 3 slots were open, then the problem would be solved. Users will still have to queue, but if there is 2 slots, the first two users in the queue can join. If there is 8 slots, the first 8 users in the queue can join.
Click to expand...
I'd agree with your post - I did misunderstand it, and that sounds like a good idea.

Apart from this
AngelWV said:
You my friend, got the wrong end of the stick.
Click to expand...
This is just insulting to be honest, and it's quite unneeded.
 
Friendy

Friendy

SMP Overlord & Events Manager
Donor
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
2,528
Reaction score
1,402
20 25 30
Prizyms said:
I'd agree with your post - I did misunderstand it, and that sounds like a good idea.

Apart from this

This is just insulting to be honest, and it's quite unneeded.
Click to expand...
It was not meant to insult you, I removed it as I thought that it may be taken the wrong way, and clearly it has been. I apologise if it is insulting, but it was rather just to say that you mis-understood.
 
GmK

GmK

International Man Of Cake
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
2,987
Reaction score
5,686
25 150 50 20 30 20 15 10 10 5 2 1
AngelWV said:
It was not meant to insult you, I removed it as I thought that it may be taken the wrong way, and clearly it has been. I apologise if it is insulting, but it was rather just to say that you mis-understood.
Click to expand...
It would be unfair to the first player, as he might only check every 170sec - and it would suck if place 2 and 3 would get in ahead of him, as they spam relog more often...

The 180sec check makes sense ;)

Also, remember, only 43 slots are open to non-staff.
 
Friendy

Friendy

SMP Overlord & Events Manager
Donor
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
2,528
Reaction score
1,402
20 25 30
GmK said:
It would be unfair to the first player, as he might only check every 170sec - and it would suck if place 2 and 3 would get in ahead of him, as they spam relog more often...

The 180sec check makes sense ;)

Also, remember, only 43 slots are open to non-staff.
Click to expand...
What I meant is all 3 could get in, whether they got in before him or not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top