Okay, got my mind into this again.
So Sploorky got lynched, SerialKiller didnt kill. (block, didnt shoot, shot protected person, etc)
People get suspicious on Ltin for stating the oppisite what everyone else said.
Im not sure how he is suspicious of saying SK didnt shoot, are you implying that he's Sk because of it? And if so, why?
The reasoning here is sound, but weren't you pushing for a nolynch early on? That disadvantages us, as even if we nolynch anyway, we can gather information.
Maybe you miswrote this, but you are saying a no-lynch is a disadvantage, though you Can gather information out of it?
Since I don't really have any suspicions other than Pim right now, who has been strangely quiet on D1, meaning that I can't really get any more evidence supporting my theory, let's look at who's been inactive and see if they could be suspicious just to get the discussion going again, because it's starting to die already.
Still suspicious of me because the things of D0?
Lets see if this post will help you get more evidence of your theory.
And your discussion might be good for also other players, but it keeps you very nicely out of the spotlight.
Not that I have anything against you as for the moment, but dont think I wont keep an eyes out for you too.