SCP - Secure, Contain, Mafia [GAME OVER]

[Ltin]

Hmm so there is like 5 or so mafias (but less than 8). How many people did claim?

Lee and erik have not

 

[77thShad]

Erik, claim or be lynched.

Vote Erik

 

[Notme]

Lee and erik have not

Hmm

Here is list of all (14) people alive, 7 of them or less is mafia. Others are townie or third party.

Raxo2222 - Vanilla Townie (I claimed it some time ago)
Ltin
Timdood3
Jolteon42
Samlen
GmK
Old_Man_Oak_63
chicken23456789
Lee_Scar - Not claimed
Erik5456 - Not claimed
The road to ruin
Faliara

Votecount - Now stuff has changed.

Lee_Scar - 1 - (The Road To Ruin) [7 more]
Erik5456 - 2 - (Raxo2222, Ltin) [6 more]

With 15 alive it'll take 8 to lynch and 7 to no-lynch.

more like 14 people - I think you counted nottykitten in it.

77_is_the_best
Jivvi
cooliorules

 

[Notme]

How the duck last 3 people suddenly landed at bottom? >.>

 

[Ltin]

How the duck last 3 people suddenly landed at bottom? >.>

?

 

[cooliorules]

Raxo, how do you get that there are 7 mafia?

 

[Ltin]

It's a 1/3 ratio usually

 

[The Road to Ruin]

It's a 1/3 ratio usually

Wouldn't that leave us with 9 or 10 mafia since we started with 28? If that was the case we should have already lost.

 

[Ltin]

Wouldn't that leave us with 9 or 10 mafia since we started with 28? If that was the case we should have already lost.

It could also be 1/4 or somewhere in the middle. We talked about this in our room a bit

 

[The Road to Ruin]

It could also be 1/4 or somewhere in the middle. We talked about this in our room a bit

28/4=x. This is as bad as my math skills after nap time!

 

[Ltin]

28/4=x. This is as bad as my math skills after nap time!

It's 7

 

[Ltin]

Alright people, we've got to do something, and somebody is obviously going to need to take the lead.
I say we Vote erik

 

[The Road to Ruin]

Alright people, we've got to do something, and somebody is obviously going to need to take the lead.
I say we Vote erik

If for no other reason than to pressure a claim

Vote Erik
I've never had a wrong hunch before, don't really know where to go from here.

 

[Timdood3]

If for no other reason than to pressure a claim

Vote Erik
I've never had a wrong hunch before, don't really know where to go from here.

*cough* remember pvc? ;-;

 

[Oak Milk]

If for no other reason than to pressure a claim

Vote Erik
I've never had a wrong hunch before, don't really know where to go from here.

Why not Lee? if anything I'd rather see Lee claim than erik, (although I'd rather see both of them claim) considering he survived a unanimous O5 vote.

 

[Lee_scar]

I see no reason to not to lynch hunter. From my viewpoint, if he is scp-096 (which I think is fairly possible), then it's my goal to kill him, or even if he's another role, he's been actively trying to get me killed anyways.

Honestly after reviewing some things, I would like to ask our host if a player has won, or met their win con.
As samlen said his win con was hunters death, if the case is where no one has met their win con, then that proves that samlen was lying and only had intentions to push a lynch.

However looking at his post here he doenst say its his win con, only that is his 'goal' meaning he might either unlock abilities, or kill the containment person. Seeing as it was an scp that revolves around strict containment and such.

So for clarification on if this is a second mans game or not Fiestaguy

 

[Samlen]

Goal, win condition, I view the terms synonymous here. I've already won, but as it's a third-party win, the town vs. mafia struggle goes on until one of those sides win. Honestly, I don't think Fiesta would confirm if it's a 'second mans game' since that would be him confirming I am what I say I am, which the host isn't allowed to do (at least I'm fairly certain about this).

 

[The Road to Ruin]

*cough* remember pvc? ;-;

 

[cooliorules]

Okay now I'm torn between the two. After what oak said about him surviving the 05 kill, I would like for Lee to claim.

vote Leescar

Vote will be taken off when you claim (unless it's a stupid ass claim and all, of course)

 

[Lee_scar]

Vote will be taken off when you claim (unless it's a stupid ass claim and all, of course)

Ill claim after host confirms if someone has won or not.

 

[Timdood3]

Ill claim after host confirms if someone has won or not.

I can't see how that could possibly be relevant. Relevant or not, if he didn't say it at the time of the (supposed) victory, he's not going to.

 

[Ltin]

Ill claim after host confirms if someone has won or not.

Wouldn't that break the integrity of the game. And does it matter?

 

[Fiestaguy]

Ill claim after host confirms if someone has won or not.

I cannot clarify if someone has won or not. All you have to know is that the game goes on.

 

[Samlen]

Ill claim after host confirms if someone has won or not.

I'm beginning to wonder if you're a third-party with it's own win condition, with the way you're pushing for this seemingly random bit of information...

 

[Notme]

Well I said 7 mafia at most not exactly 7 >.>