Never gonna expect anything serious out of you guys again.
In all seriousness, I guess I have to answer the questions as well, huh?
Is Hunter changing his playstyle in favour of a No Lynch?
No, not that I could tell. Sure, he's saying No Lynch at the moment, but unless he actually stays with that decision for more than a day or two, I can't say I can note any significant change in his playstyle. Besides, he did say he was gonna be active the first few days and then go more inactive because holiday stuff.
Was myusername defending Alpha and if he was, what of it?
Yeah, sure, I guess you could say he was defending him. But as far as I've understood the situation so far, it was on the grounds of not really being able to make anything out of Alpha's claim and therefore him not being as lynch-worthy as others. I see the logic in that and I don't think we can conclude that it was because myusername is scum buddies with Alpha just yet.
Who is the most suspicious person to you right now?
Notty, Alpha Duffie and Hunter.
Who is the least suspicious person to you right now?
Everyone else.
Why are these people least/most suspicious?
The thing with Alpha and Notty is that they're not suspicious to me in the sense that most people tend to use the word in mafia games. I don't regard them to be likely to be mafia, or to be likely to be town, or to be likely to be third party. To me, they could be anything. However, it's their claims that make me cautious of them, since both claims look like complete bullshit. Whether the claims are truthful or not, and I strongly believe it to be the last, I feel like they have some kind of a plan in this game, a certain agenda they wish to push, and the fact that I don't know what it is makes me extremely cautious of them and anything they say I will take with a grain of salt.
The FoS on Hunter comes from his erratic gameplay and almost mind-boggling looking actions from time to time. People have pointed out many things that seem to turn the tables against Hunter and I find the points to be rather legitimate. The fact that Hunter hasn't responded to most of them tells me that either they're right in their assumptions and Hunter can't find a way to answer to them without looking like complete scum, or that he couldn't care less about any accusations against him, which would suggest that the accusations are wrong. You could say that my FoS on Hunter is 50% actual suspicion of him being a third-party of mafia and 50% policy.
Now, as for Duffie, a few things have caught my eye and I don't quite know what to think of them. The gameplay change on it's own wouldn't perhaps be a big deal, but the first thing that caught my eye was that when he was asked about the change, he said "Glad someone noticed." So now we know that he's playing differently intentionally. Why? That's the first question that comes up.
The second (and, so far, the final thing) that seemed peculiar was his answer to the first question that myusername asked. I quote:
why is hunter suddenly trying to switching from his usual playstyle to choosing a no-lynch?
Perhaps I scared him.
Scared him how exactly? You've barely said anything in the game, and direct attacks against Hunter is something I saw in only one or two posts of yours. Do you think this is sufficient grounds for him to be scared of you?
What this all put together looks like to me is that Duffie's leaving breadcrumbs all over the place for
someone to find, and that his role, being the unusual one that he said it was, has something to do with interacting somehow with a certain other role. I also read from all of this that the role he has is something that GmK has specifically come up with for this particular game, so we could expect anything from him and to conclude my theory, I also hypotesize that Duffie is a third party, because all of this put together suggests that his win condition is something closely related to his particular role, not to get rid of all the threats to the town as the town win condition is, or to make the mafia control the vote, as the mafia win condition would be.
If you arent voting anyone, why not and do you support a Lynch or a No-lynch.
I'm not voting anyone at the moment, because I want to make the most out of this day and if we all start voting now, it'll be cut pretty short, right? As for the second part of the question, I think we all know what my answer is.
