Русская мафия! [Complete]

[Hunter]

i'll just place my vote for now:
i believe out of all of yous aqua, 77 and whoever the police chief is are mafia (which seems weird since aqua has been defending me i think? but that may just be to get myuser lynched)
i think that this day has been townie v townie atm since myusers claim does actually look believable when i don't get my head wrapped up
since tim's reports aren't proven to be false so far and aqua was received as inno on that, the only other suspicion of mine would be 77 who has been going against myuser all day and claiming to have done an action which goes against the surgeon claim
vote 77thShad

u do realize myuser was literally marked not innocent

he's taken the "if someone dies" aspect from tim and notty
the "only one alive in town" part from me
and the doc with side effect part from duffie

literally all of his claim is an amalgamation of previous claims

i just think oog is much more of a risk considering he literally claims to intercept and censor investigation reports as a fundamental part of his role

 

[Mooglie]

u do realize myuser was literally marked not innocent

by a policeman in training (question of sanity)
+ even you have said 'not innocent' is a set of words not typical in mafia since it's usually innocent/guilty, notty's(?) question of whether this relates to if the person killed someone or not may link to this as well

he's taken the "if someone dies" aspect from tim and notty

if he was planning to use this he'd probably say it about himself to try and get himself off the voting

the "only one alive in town" part from me

i don't remember you saying it (well atleast before him atleast i'll check)

and the doc with side effect part from duffie

'doc with side effect' is different from jailer (or curfew enforcer in this game) which is already a typical role

i just think oog is much more of a risk considering he literally claims to intercept and censor investigation reports as a fundamental part of his role

you seem to be ignoring all the uses of it and just focusing on what bad it can do if i target any of the claimed power roles (since everyone has claimed to either a PR or not) which i won't

 

[Hunter]

confirms reports!

excuse me sir but you are dead wrong on that
your role removes the info from the report itself
you literally cannot confirm reports except to the extent of the player visiting another player

even if your claim is true, that would mean you alone know the results of any investigation censored. we would not be able to know if the results you claim are true.

for example, you claim caff may be the telegram person thing.
cat watched duffie yesterday while duffie blocked caff.

cat has no fricking clue what happened to duffie last night. you claim duffie had no visits.

yet later you claim the block didn't work on caff as part of a theory. why would you do this if you had a report claiming no one visited duffie?
Sounds like a slip to me.
seems a bit suspicious, aye? bet something did happen to duffie and you're not letting us know, scum

 

[Mooglie]

you literally cannot confirm reports except to the extent of the player visiting another player

yes which is why they are reports and not actions

we would not be able to know if the results you claim are true.

if you think that notty's 'not innocent' report is true then just get them to investigate me?

yet later you claim the block didn't work on caff as part of a theory. why would you do this if you had a report claiming no one visited duffie?

since i'm getting cat's report, she's not gonna appear on the report is she?
the theory is that due to cat somehow adopting the role of the person she watches she also blocked duffie, but since there was no report to override the watcher one then that one was received anyway (i did state this in the theory post as well)

seems a bit suspicious, aye? bet something did happen to duffie and you're not letting us know, scum

i think that cat would of received more if something did happen seeing as i got half the report

 

[Hunter]

since i'm getting cat's report, she's not gonna appear on the report is she?
the theory is that due to cat somehow adopting the role of the person she watches she also blocked duffie, but since there was no report to override the watcher one then that one was received anyway (i did state this in the theory post as well)

lol is this a joke

you actually think she gets the role of her target? that's ridiculously unlikely and silly
so you think if she watched a mafia she'd be maf?

 

[Mooglie]

lol is this a joke

you actually think she gets the role of her target? that's ridiculously unlikely and silly
so you think if she watched a mafia she'd be maf?

seems a bit more believable than 'censoring her means shes not able to post!' <3
+ the theory is if caff is the telegrammer which i do believe but it could not be true obviously

 

[Hunter]

seems a bit more believable than 'censoring her means shes not able to post!' <3

i literally said it was just a possibility. i don't sincerely believe that.
what i do believe is cat's lurking hardcore and if she doesn't post by tomorrow (day 3) i'd seriously consider a policy lynch for lack of clarification

but your flip would also confirm/deny cat's roleclaim to an extend

excuse me sir but you are dead wrong on that
your role removes the info from the report itself
you literally cannot confirm reports except to the extent of the player visiting another player

even if your claim is true, that would mean you alone know the results of any investigation censored. we would not be able to know if the results you claim are true.

for example, you claim caff may be the telegram person thing.
cat watched duffie yesterday while duffie blocked caff.

cat has no fricking clue what happened to duffie last night. you claim duffie had no visits.

yet later you claim the block didn't work on caff as part of a theory. why would you do this if you had a report claiming no one visited duffie?
Sounds like a slip to me.
seems a bit suspicious, aye? bet something did happen to duffie and you're not letting us know, scum

right now this is pretty much the main gist of why you need to go hang

 

[Mooglie]

right now this is pretty much the main gist of why you need to go hang

seems like you just downright ignored me answering all of that stuff ok

 

[Hunter]

seems like you just downright ignored me answering all of that stuff ok

what answer i didnt even ask a question

you mean excuses?

if you mean the thing about "being reports and not actions" idk what you mean by that
literally you remove all useful info from the report
and take it for yourself
so there's nothing to confirm. for all we know you could be bullshitting the stolen results
plus that is so obviously antitown it hurts

Ooglie101 your caff theory relies on cat's role being different from what she claims

 

[Hunter]

if im going to be completely honest with myself:
cat supposedly had potatoes according to oog
potatoes have been confirmed to fuel maf actions
ooglie knows cat visited ender and duffie

oog did you get the potato alert again upon visiting cat n2

 

[Mooglie]

you mean excuses?

or you know logical things that go against your ideas that you won't accept

so there's nothing to confirm. for all we know you could be bullshitting the stolen results

i actually answered about ender and no visits before cat claimed her role, just in response to 'obfuscating results',so i did know the results

Ooglie101 your caff theory relies on cat's role being different from what she claims

or you know a part of role that is hidden/she didn't say
and [once again] the caff theory may not be right

oog did you get the potato alert again upon visiting cat n2

no

 

[Aqua]

This is actually the best reasoning I've seen for us to lynch raxo honestly. Even if he is town PR he'll be able to try and shoot a mafia (unless he gets mad, game throws and shoots a townie on purpose pls don't) if he isn't then even better. Considering the fact that people have mentioned before (as have I) that raxo doesn't really add much info in day periods I say it would make sense to call it a policy lynch as well
Unvote
Vote notme

same tbh

unvote
vote raxo notme

 

[Hunter]

so you "found" potatoes next to her and didn't take any

potatoes are confirmed through samlen's death to fuel antitown night actions
potatoes can also, presumably, be confiscated or passed around

maybe cat got worried and passed the bag to someone else before the night ended

honestly why didn't you instantly go after cat d2 start upon knowing she had a mafia-related item

 

[Mooglie]

honestly why didn't you instantly go after cat d2 start upon knowing she had a mafia-related item

since cat said the bag was stolen and i somewhat trust cat
+ potatoholics club makes sense for her to have the bag despite having no apparent potato-related actions

 

[Aqua]

excuse me sir but you are dead wrong on that
your role removes the info from the report itself
you literally cannot confirm reports except to the extent of the player visiting another player

Since I'm kinda busy IRL atm, I haven't been following maf properly sothis may of already been covered but Ooglie101 does ur censor ability tell you the info you censored from your victim or not?

 

[Enderfive]

Votecount:

Ooglie101 (4/9) - Hunter, Myusername22, Jivvi, Timdood3
77thShad (3/9) - Mastersten, Nottykitten, Ooglie101
Myusername22 (2/9) - Notme, 77thShad
Notme (2/9) - Erik5456, Aqua

Deadline: Thursday 28 January 22:00:00 GMT


Also, I'd like to throw in this friendly reminder:

Aggressiveness towards the hypothetical role of a player is okay; aggressiveness towards the player is somewhat less so. We're all here to have fun, so some players could do well to consider for a moment how others might feel when posting so they wouldn't frustrate anyone needlessly and some other players could maybe take things less personally and more in spirit of the game. Again, this is just a reminder and not accusations towards anyone specific, but I felt like reminding you all couldn't hurt, before things had a chance to actually turn into something like this.

 

[Infected_alien8_]

Cat do you know if your role relies on those potatoes in some way? From the word 'potatoholics' club surely that implies the guys in there need potatoes Perhaps your role switched night 2 due to the potatoes being stolen?

 

[Mastersten]

This is actually the best reasoning I've seen for us to lynch raxo honestly. Even if he is town PR he'll be able to try and shoot a mafia (unless he gets mad, game throws and shoots a townie on purpose pls don't) if he isn't then even better. Considering the fact that people have mentioned before (as have I) that raxo doesn't really add much info in day periods I say it would make sense to call it a policy lynch as well
Unvote
Vote notme

This kinda makes sense to me (tbh I find it suspicious Notme is acting very sketchy since the beginning)
unvote
vote notme

 

[Notme]

lol then someone is going to die.

 

[Hunter]

If raxo has control over who he shoots upon lynch, he should vote whoever has the second-most amount of votes on them

 

[Hunter]

I meant shoot whoever has the second-most amount of votes

 

[Notme]

Hah so ooglie would be second on list, if I get lynched for now.

Also if most active people aren't mafia then:

unvote
vote Erik

 

[Infected_alien8_]

Hah so ooglie would be second on list, if I get lynched for now.

Also if most active people aren't mafia then:

unvote
vote Erik

They didn't say the most active people aren't mafia, she just meant that killing off an active, contributing person wouldn't be a great idea because then we'd have less contribution \o/

 

[Mooglie]

Hah so ooglie would be second on list, if I get lynched for now.

or you know don't blindly follow hunter and trust ur heart!

 

[Hunter]

Ooglie101 you think the chief is maf?

most likely person to be this supposed "chief" is infected_alien8_