"Overwhelming evidence" that can all be easily explained otherwise. When I don't reply, I am either reading but too busy to get my thoughts together into a post or I don't have anything worthwhile to say. And if you recall, we have more than one protective role, so it's very likely that a kill and a protect coincided.
The argument is fair, but I really still feel like you've been right at that activity/contribution level that tends to resemble a mafia lurk pattern. Whilst I don't doubt that you've probably been reading, I can't accept that it is the entirety of the story. Besides, It's not just that you don't talk much, but also that your posts don't look like they are determined to find the truth. You are my day 0 scum read, and I tend to have good luck with day 0 reads.
Furthermore, Duffie was a roleblocking protective role, whom roleblocked you that night. If we assume for a moment that 77 isn't lying you're forgetting that 77 also claims to have visited erik that night( again we're assuming he isn't lying). To give some credit to him, lets pretend there's some kind of driver that drove him away from erik that night. This would mean that a driver redirected his night action. If that were the case he could've protected someone, but that's two protective roles compared against two nightkills. lets say my protection of erik took out samlen, which i think is the most likely explanation for the days events. I believe there were 18 players in the game that night, so you expect me to believe a driver, which is already an unlikely role made a 2/18 chance (2 protective roles out of 18 players) of picking a protective role and a 1/18 chance of blocking a kill in that way. The odds of this occuring are 1 in 162.
ok yeah raxo was definitely me what are the odds.
1 in 6
I also believe a 1/6 chance is definitely possible, but still unlikely. I find it much more likely that you killed raxo than Jivvi getting a 1/6 shot on raxo.
Welp caff is lying scum vote for them please. Reason im saying this is because they visited notme last night alongside both jivvi and our good friend mastersen who also seems to be scum since he's a "one-shot" PM. Mastersen is most probably scum as well but didnt blatantly lie trying to get attention off himself. Realistically we lynch caff or mastersen from my info. And jivvi is the gun is an item can it only successfully kill once or what? Cuz if so and its gone from your inv then you definitely killed. If not though then you werent the killer and one of the two mentioned above are. Gotta give props to caff thought. Claiming that type of role and simply using dead people as your investigations is very convenient. Was almost believable too.
Vote CaffeinatedKitty
Well then, I didn't know that counted as a visit, though I suppose I should've. Mastersten can back me up on this. Last night, the two of us and raxo were in an inn together. It apparently meets every three nights, so we didn't know about it before.
This argument is going to be Meta, but I highly doubt there would be an Inn that meets every three nights. Inns are supposed to be an important part of the game, and with the number of killing rolls in the game we're already down by half the people on day 3, so basically the Inn would meet at most twice? While it isn't 'impossible' such an inn could exist I find it unlikely prizyms would bother including such an inn because it's doubtful it would have much of an effect in the game.
That's not even taking into account that it is doubtful an inn would count for night visits. like hunter pointed out, that would have the potential to break the game in some areas(what if i'd visited cat?)
so at this point believing your claim comes down to believing that:
there is a driver in this game
there is an inn that meets every third night
Inn chats count as night visits
the driver who just happens to be in this game redirected 77 and ended up protecting someone from a mafia kill (the odds of this are 1/162 or in otherwords 6%)
Jivvi took a 1/6 chance and killed raxo on the first try
All of your investigations just happen to be dead ( Btw protip: if you're going to fakeclaim just say one is dead and then claim one or two people innocent. Literally nobody will walk forward and say "No! You're wrong, I'm mafia" )
All of these are unlikely, and yet believing your claim hinges on the insanely unlikely scenario that all of these events are simultaneously true.
