or yknow they thought a doctor would be protecting the one proven town roleLike they wanted to test to see if there was a SK and went with digi since they thought SK would go for caff or SOMETHING
She sent a gif of a villager thrusting if that's what you mean?or yknow they thought a doctor would be protecting the one proven town role
also did nobody else see digi claim townie day 1 or was that just me
also did nobody else see digi claim townie day 1 or was that just me
This?Hey guys!
So I'm this guy here...
For those who don't understand, yes, I am a hip jiving villager. Ask Samlen if you don't believe me.
WhyInf I'm suspicious of you
I did at first but then concluded it was probably just a joke that had nothing to do with her role but maybe that was her softing her role :Oya was i the only one who took that as a townie claim or
Do you have any suspicions, even tiny ones, or anyone you trust a bit more than everyone else or anything?I haven't said anything because I have nothing useful to say lmao
Unfortunately not, nor do I possess any information that would allow me to have any suspicions.Do you have any suspicions, even tiny ones, or anyone you trust a bit more than everyone else or anything?
I mean in the past they have proven useful!! Not always but a lot of the time!tbh i have no idea how you guys have any suspicions so soon plus i do not believe in your "vibes" they are lies; random guesses without basis! basically why not lynch inffy??
not really, at this point.None of you have said anything yet so far today, any thoughts, suspicious, theories, ideas, people you town-read etc.?
I agree we need to start getting information and thus begin lynching someone, or we'll end up like yesterday with no lynch. I'm going to vote for Mul however, because in my eyes the only difference between Mul and Foggy is that Foggy has replied more. And talking is always more beneficial to the town.Inf is right on at least one part, we need information, something we won't get twiddling our thumbs. That being said out of everyone you could have decided to vote for Foggy feels like a wierd choice. Especially since you were outing mild speculation over Aqua at the start of the day, it doesn't feel all that... logical. That being said there hasn't been a whole lot of that so far in this game so I guess we need to start fixing that.
vote Foggy2406
Your only reason for voting Mul is meta reasoning and as the last game proved, wrong meta reasoning, to boot.Yeah I agree with notty, although foggy does seem rather weird as if he's trying to act normal by not contributing anything. As previously said, I have more reason to suspect Mul than Foggy. So for now unless anymore evidence comes up I'm still for a Mul lynch.
This confuses me, yes its true, talking more is beneficial to the town it gives us more information to work with, but on the other hand silence isn't always the mark of a mafia or 3rd party, furthermore there are others who have been just as silent as far as I can tell, so that would suggest that you are also voting Mulbery based on the fact that Aqua is voting them as well and as I have just said above, the reasoning for his vote is... flawed.I agree we need to start getting information and thus begin lynching someone, or we'll end up like yesterday with no lynch. I'm going to vote for Mul however, because in my eyes the only difference between Mul and Foggy is that Foggy has replied more. And talking is always more beneficial to the town.
So yeah my vote is going to the more quiet player. Also if I were to vote Foggy that would mean I believe in Infs dream and that would make me mafia aswell!
Vote Mulbery
True but you gotta admit, not speaking doesn't help the town.This confuses me, yes its true, talking more is beneficial to the town it gives us more information to work with, but on the other hand silence isn't always the mark of a mafia or 3rd party
The only person I can think of whose just as quiet is caff, but shes proven so I'm not gonna vote her. I'm splitting votes because I'd rather have someone alive who speaks more than mul does. Even though Foggy hasn't really brought anything to the table, I like playing games where people are active and in the end thats gonna help the town more than not talking.furthermore there are others who have been just as silent as far as I can tell, so that would suggest that you are also voting Mulbery based on the fact that Aqua is voting them as well and as I have just said above, the reasoning for his vote is... flawed.
I'm not saying voting for Foggy is any better, its not really, but at the same time splitting up the votes for no reason makes no sense if we want information which is exactly what you've done.
First of all, I did admit that talking is more beneficial to the town, in the first sentence of my response to you.True but you gotta admit, not speaking doesn't help the town.
The only person I can think of whose just as quiet is caff, but shes proven so I'm not gonna vote her. I'm splitting votes because I'd rather have someone alive who speaks more than mul does. Even though Foggy hasn't really brought anything to the table, I like playing games where people are active and in the end thats gonna help the town more than not talking.
It seems like you don't want mul lynched for some reason. (then again it 100% seems exactly the same like I don't want foggy lynched for some reason)
I'm confused - I never outed any suspicion towards Aqua, my speculation was about him being innocent and the Mafia trying to frame him and I said I town-read him. Foggy has been my #1 suspicion so that's why I voted him.That being said out of everyone you could have decided to vote for Foggy feels like a wierd choice. Especially since you were outing mild speculation over Aqua at the start of the day, it doesn't feel all that... logical.