And I'm not discounting that or any other lead people have. But Aqua was already giving me a bad vibe from the first day and I'm not the biggest fan with their playstyle thus far.
They could very well be innocent, but I'm not ruling out other options. Inf really self-destructed himself yesterday and made himself an easy lynch for pretty much everybody involved.
They could very well be innocent, but I'm not ruling out other options. Inf really self-destructed himself yesterday and made himself an easy lynch for pretty much everybody involved.
I'm just wondering if lynching at this point is gonna be beneficial because if we kill off the Doctor by accident like we did the cop everybody is screwed... But if we don't lynch then the Mafia have a free kill basically... Does anybody have any information at all?
Hmmm I don't know who to vote for tho, like was HK trying to be sneaky and put that there as a hint? And is Aqua just a shitpost that nobody should read into? Was Oog posting first a carefully planned strat? Will Mulb ever speak again? I NEED MORE INFO!!
Aqua
Does anybody remember laughter?
and yeah as mars said, No Lynching is almost never worth it, it allows the mafia to get an extra kill in, if we start releasing evidence and suspicions now and push for a lynch on whoever is deemed most suspicious, it's worth the risk of them turning up town, even doctor.
Okay,
Firstly, I realize my post backfired on me. However, I simply got called out for sitting back, which made me 'suspicious'. In my opinion I did not sit back, and I wanted to defend myself. I had no sleezy strats hidden behind any of it.
Secondly, I am feeling I could be 'framed' now, the same way Inf got 'framed', because I posted one poorly constructed sentence. Since, Aqua was fast to jump the gun and vote for me, he has become my #1 suspect. You could just be shitposting, but you were also the one to go ham on Inf (we all know how that turned out).
VOTE Aqua
Firstly, I realize my post backfired on me. However, I simply got called out for sitting back, which made me 'suspicious'. In my opinion I did not sit back, and I wanted to defend myself. I had no sleezy strats hidden behind any of it.
Secondly, I am feeling I could be 'framed' now, the same way Inf got 'framed', because I posted one poorly constructed sentence. Since, Aqua was fast to jump the gun and vote for me, he has become my #1 suspect. You could just be shitposting, but you were also the one to go ham on Inf (we all know how that turned out).
VOTE Aqua
Aqua
Does anybody remember laughter?
>Claims he is being framed, instantly tries to pass it on to me
When it gets to the point when voting people at thye start of the day raises suspicion, you know you've got a lame mafia game. Also I wasn't the first to start voting inf, we've been over this, Oog was. I joined the lynch train because I felt his reactions to people accusing him made him even more suspicious. I did however point out his suspicious behaviour before hand, however, if ur gonna say "saying what you find is suspicious is going ham", then the mafia game is dead, because that logic is stupid.
Right now, your actions seem rather extreme playing the "I'm about to be framed" victim card because caff noticed you make a funny grammatical mistake, which could be a soft claim, or could just be that... a grammatical mistake, either way me voting you was an RVS type joke, but ultimately, the response you gave really gratifies it.
I'm keeping my vote on you because that reaction seemed extremely scummy, as if you're squirming to pass on peoples gazes to someone else.
Okay,
Maybe my post was a little bit extreme. However, you are also slightly twisting my words. I never said you voted Inf first, I just said that you were the one who pulled a lot of attention to Inf being suspicious (okay, going ham is not appropriate here, and you were not the only one). Also I did use 'framed' instead of saying, I am getting framed, because I could not find the exact description of what happend to Inf.
And while you are the one blaming me for being to extreme you seem to overreach quite a bit yourself. When I read your reply the words "lame", "stupid", "victim card" and "extremely scummy" don't really give off a nice image of me.
I am starting to notice a lot of things are a 'joke' or a 'shitpost' with you, but this could also be a great cover. And while this maybe started of by me making a mistake in my post, it surely has drawn a lot of attention to me, something you did contribute to.
Maybe my post was a little bit extreme. However, you are also slightly twisting my words. I never said you voted Inf first, I just said that you were the one who pulled a lot of attention to Inf being suspicious (okay, going ham is not appropriate here, and you were not the only one). Also I did use 'framed' instead of saying, I am getting framed, because I could not find the exact description of what happend to Inf.
And while you are the one blaming me for being to extreme you seem to overreach quite a bit yourself. When I read your reply the words "lame", "stupid", "victim card" and "extremely scummy" don't really give off a nice image of me.
I am starting to notice a lot of things are a 'joke' or a 'shitpost' with you, but this could also be a great cover. And while this maybe started of by me making a mistake in my post, it surely has drawn a lot of attention to me, something you did contribute to.
So you are keeping your vote on me... okay, why would I expect you to take it off after I voted for you!?
I think he implied originally that he voted for you as you had softclaimed and was the only piece of evidence, however, your response has made him more suspicious...TBH at this point I'm suspicious of a lot of people... I mean looking back on it Oak63 your reaction to the death of Infected_alien8_ was a little OTT, but I've never spoken to you and haven't heard much from you so I don't know if that's just how you react... but both HK and Aqua are a little suspicious
I would rather lynch someone that isn't active than end up having a no lynch scenario and end up giving the Mafia an advantage... unless any evidence comes up hinting toward another player I think this is the safest bet for me.
D
Deleted member 4601
Guest
Unless... The former option is worse?
I'll clarify that I'm not really inactive. I check this thread fairly often, and if I do have any information that I can contribute or if I see the need to defend myself, I will post. Otherwise it's not something I'd really do :x
Also, similar to Oak, the whole Inffy lynching business happened while I was asleep.