Tavern Arcana - Mafia Win

Infected_alien8_

Garry's Mod Admin
Mafia Host
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
1,760
Reaction score
6,243
The theme is there because they directly correlate to ability, as I know from my ability and as HK has shown us now. I don't agree that they all match alignments because mass claiming would be bad. And adding a 3p role that nobodys has any idea of that gains an advantage on mass claim is not a good way to prevent a mass claim tbh.
gee it's almost as if, in mafia, someone's role/ability will be determined by their team
 

Aqua

Does anybody remember laughter?
Mafia Host
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
640
Reaction score
2,808
The theme is there because they directly correlate to ability, as I know from my ability and as HK has shown us now. I don't agree that they all match alignments because mass claiming would be bad. And adding a 3p role that nobodys has any idea of that gains an advantage on mass claim is not a good way to prevent a mass claim tbh.
yes but the ability also correlates to alignment.

You're not gonna have a mafia cop just like you're not gonna have a town hooker (well you can have town blockers but they're not hookers so my point kinda works cant think of other standard maf roles tbh).

I get where you're coming from and I do think if we could just massclaim mafia would be screwed but that's why I think a counter measure will be put in place to prevent that.

Neither Claire or Jolt are stupid (I hope), they know a mass claim would ruin th e game so I'm sure they wont implement it.
 

Iggish

Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
359
Reaction score
827
IMO Notty claimed when she did for the reason that she knew she was going to be targeted / cced later in the game because of her tower role. By exposing it early, she hoped to gain the confidence of others under the false pretense of proving Inf's card theory wrong.
That is why she has spent so much time trying to convince us that the tower isn't bad, although everything I've looked up shows that it's like 85% bad.

Notty, you have said that lynching you prove Inf's theory is a very bad idea. How? Objectively, we can lynch someone who has a suspicious role and is likely (IMO) to be scum and if that doesn't work, then we have info. What does lynching Inf do?
 

Aqua

Does anybody remember laughter?
Mafia Host
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
640
Reaction score
2,808
IMO Notty claimed when she did for the reason that she knew she was going to be targeted / cced later in the game because of her tower role. By exposing it early, she hoped to gain the confidence of others under the false pretense of proving Inf's card theory wrong.
That is why she has spent so much time trying to convince us that the tower isn't bad, although everything I've looked up shows that it's like 85% bad.

Notty, you have said that lynching you prove Inf's theory is a very bad idea. How? Objectively, we can lynch someone who has a suspicious role and is likely (IMO) to be scum and if that doesn't work, then we have info. What does lynching Inf do?
I mean that's also what Danni did last game, and danni was town.

I know notty isn't as stupid as danni and might even be trying to do the same strat as people may trust her because of it but you can't assume that.
 

Infected_alien8_

Garry's Mod Admin
Mafia Host
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
1,760
Reaction score
6,243
IMO Notty claimed when she did for the reason that she knew she was going to be targeted / cced later in the game because of her tower role. By exposing it early, she hoped to gain the confidence of others under the false pretense of proving Inf's card theory wrong.
That is why she has spent so much time trying to convince us that the tower isn't bad, although everything I've looked up shows that it's like 85% bad.

Notty, you have said that lynching you prove Inf's theory is a very bad idea. How? Objectively, we can lynch someone who has a suspicious role and is likely (IMO) to be scum and if that doesn't work, then we have info. What does lynching Inf do?
T H A N K YOU
SOMEONE WHO MAKES SENSE JUST ENTERED THE ROOM
 

Nottykitten

Nomnomnom kitteh!
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
6,021
IMO Notty claimed when she did for the reason that she knew she was going to be targeted / cced later in the game because of her tower role. By exposing it early, she hoped to gain the confidence of others under the false pretense of proving Inf's card theory wrong.
That is why she has spent so much time trying to convince us that the tower isn't bad, although everything I've looked up shows that it's like 85% bad.
Ofcourse I claimed partly for that reason. You cant expect me to sit back and have everyone trash talk my card and then when time for mass claim comes people are like 'TOWER IS BAD' what am I supposted to do then?
Notty, you have said that lynching you prove Inf's theory is a very bad idea. How? Objectively, we can lynch someone who has a suspicious role and is likely (IMO) to be scum and if that doesn't work, then we have info. What does lynching Inf do?
Lynching Inf is the equivalent of not lynching me. I'm fine with a No lynch or if people want one then Inf over me is way better.

Also we can litterally wait for night to see how cards relate to alignment.
 
Top