Nottykitten
Nomnomnom kitteh!
So you think we should go democracy and then lose? Sounds f u n
So you think we should go democracy and then lose? Sounds f u n
literally pointless as we only need 3/5 to be town and there's a 1/3 chance in mafs eyes that we elect bp so the watcher should be on dictator on the chance that maf attempts to do the swap shit or kill dictatorDo you have a reason
How will the watcher know who the dictator isliterally pointless as we only need 3/5 to be town and there's a 1/3 chance in mafs eyes that we elect bp so the watcher should be on dictator on the chance that maf attempts to do the swap shit or kill dictator
Pretty sure it's in one of priz's info posts, that whoever is dictator loses their previous abilitiesWait really?
Where'd you find that
you know, if we choose to go with democracy instead of autocracy, we need someone we’re more willing to lynch, as well as people we could elect to take any murdered representative’s placeSo you think we should go democracy and then lose? Sounds f u n
We're not doing democracy though, since that will end badlyyou know, if we choose to go with democracy instead of autocracy, we need someone we’re more willing to lynch, as well as people we could elect to take any murdered representative’s place
I dunno, to be honest. I feel like it could go either way. If everyone else in the council is on board, I could go for it.We're not doing democracy though, since that will end badly
You're on board with installing a dictator right? Since we kinda need you/hunter/velz to all be on board with it or else it will screw it all up
(but im assuming others have which is why I'm kinda going with it for now, Im not saying that to be like "I havent checked over it so nobody should believe it because I, the great one, has not checked it" or anything which is how it sounded to me when I just read it back!)Honestly this just seems impossible to win
If we don't massclaim we're 100% gonna use up our 3-5 mislynches/miskills or however many it was again and are probably going to kill our useful PRs anyways
If we do massclaim, according to UNU's calculations which I still haven't checked over by the way, we only have 1 mislynch, which is almost impossible to keep to
If we do massclaim, according to UNU's calculations which I still haven't checked over by the way, we only have 1 mislynch, which is almost impossible to keep to
I am alive... just been busy and ive only ready up to page 2... and its now 3am so i might be able to catch up tomorrow... just some people type too muchFog are you alive
No, please don't!Protestor and Whistleblower, I think you should claim (bolding so it grabs attention!)
If you don't claim there's a chance (depending on who we end up electing) that Mafia are in there and so they kill our dictator n1 and we're forced to NL, which could happen again the next day as well if we still have Mafia elected
Also if we have all town in there then nobody has any reason other than breaking the rules and gamethrowing to turn it into a democracy since then they're garunteeing we can only lynch proven towns and democracy is a bad idea <3
You are aware we're not doing democracy rightNo, please don't!
Both of these roles are v. useful under democracy, and Protester dies if they're elected council & attend court
I think Inf & whoever came up with this plan may want to irrelevantize Protestor by heavily encouraging a swap to dictatorship, and Whistleblower greatly helps the town when we don't know who they are.
It's likely maf wants to have these roles reveal themselves so that Maf can try to kill off the Whistleblower early, with a fully town council so the reveal is only used on already claimed uncc'd townies, rendering it useless.
I knew you'd use that line again.You are aware we're not doing democracy right