3 town is the bare minumum for our council as I said like 30 pages back.also if we're going democracy is it better to have 3 town in the council to allow the subpoenad player to claim safely or have 2 town and 1 of the scumreads so that one of the scumreads is blocked, since i also don't think theres a way that both 2 town players can die in the same night under democracy so we just trust the alignment that the remaining town guy claims the subpoenad guy was
As great as that would be, I'd rather have 3 potential dissidents forced to skip their night actions. That's a big plus for town.Also if we're going autocracy the dictator can just outright murder Inf doesn't that sound appealing Hunter
scrable's been so ODD and different compared to last game and extra useless & rune has literally done nothing
You're correct that I'm behaving "odd". I didn't sleep well for the past 3 days and also still have lots of catching up to do with physics. And rereading the thread three times, yeah as if I would be doing that. No I wrote that and then tried to reread it, got bored, and proceeded to do something else.also on the scrable subject he posted something about rereading the thread again which means he would have read through the entirety of it 3 times and i genuinely dont think anyone is sad enough to do that & he has made literally 0 useful posts on anything (from memory) so i feel like he's just saying that to maintain a perception of him being active so he stays out of the limelight and out of the lurker pool which seems to be the safe zone of not being elected to a democratic council at least
i think he's talking about the court3 town is the bare minumum for our council as I said like 30 pages back.
velz is uncc'd what are you talking aboutYou must have a majority vote within the council so you must have 3 confirmed town. Velz may be town, but I don't think they even know themselves so I'm not voting them in.
We all know HK is the rev AquaAlso I believe keeping ender in a democratic council if he is the rev (which that will prove as there won't be a rev kill tonight if we're in a democracy) is our best move, it will stop him from being able to nightkill or win. He'll basically become a cute mascot <3
sameI wish, I had such a good role last game until SOMEBODY reported my beautiful meme and now i'm rather salty about being town.
So you decided to lie about re-reading the thread already before giving your opinion on democracy vs autocracy, and funnily enough siding with democracyYou're correct that I'm behaving "odd". I didn't sleep well for the past 3 days and also still have lots of catching up to do with physics. And rereading the thread three times, yeah as if I would be doing that. No I wrote that and then tried to reread it, got bored, and proceeded to do something else.
Because I was tired, also I already was convinced that democracy will be the best way to go.So you decided to lie about re-reading the thread already before giving your opinion on democracy vs autocracy, and funnily enough siding with democracy
Why would you even lie about that
It is lying yes, when you literally tell everyone you've re-read the thread, are presumably informed about the different arguments, and then take a side of democracyBecause I was tired, also I already was convinced that democracy will be the best way to go.
Just didn't know what people wrote previously.
Is it really lying though? Anyway, with the third time I actually managed to force myself to read your posts.
So you've now read it a third time???Is it really lying though? Anyway, with the third time I actually managed to force myself to read your posts.
I mean jesus, the amount you write.
such as?depends on a number of different factors that i can't predict before actually ending up in the council
:shrug:It is lying yes, when you literally tell everyone you've re-read the thread, are presumably informed about the different arguments, and then take a side of democracy
Being convinced democracy is the way to go without even reading the thread sounds like mafia who's just trying to go with the lesser option
So you've now read it a third time???
Also what's your opinion on Sploorky?
I read it a first time, I can understand though how you can mishear "first" as "third".
Yeah I must have misheard you my bad???Is it really lying though? Anyway, with the third time I actually managed to force myself to read your posts.
I mean jesus, the amount you write.
To make your life easier if you're mafiaNot really going with the lesser option, otherwise why would I go with it?
Have you got an opinion on anyone? Since last game you had reads on people, this game you seem to have done no scumhunting at allNo opinion on him currently.
velz is 100% town unless one of the 3 roles we're having people claim to be one of has chosen to throw the game3 town is the bare minumum for our council as I said like 30 pages back.
You must have a majority vote within the council so you must have 3 confirmed town. Velz may be town, but I don't think they even know themselves so I'm not voting them in.
tbh this is an interesting thoughtAlso now that I'm actually awake I think blocking mafia poisoner should be our #1 priority and I think we should ditch the 100% instant-accurate reports (we'll know if they're likely accurate later on anyway) in an attempt to isolate the poisoner because in democracy without the poisoner dead, even with a decent cop system, I can't see us realistically winning
Having poisoner dead actually gives us a shot
Yeah I think this would be the best way to use the council actuallytbh this is an interesting thought
we've all been looking at the council as a group cop but what if it was a group ROLEBLOCK (this idea even feels dumb as im typing it)
when the 5 representatives (hunter/fali/velz/???/???) are elected, in their evening chat thing they choose which one of the 3 proven go to court and who to subpoena, then they take both unproven people to form the 3 person council
best case scenario, the two ??? and the subpoenad player are all mafia (one being gula) and choose to not kill the proven representative with them for whatever reason (maybe the subpoenad player is the godfather) resulting in 5 mafia being blocked in total (2 ???, subpoenad, 2 more carrying out the mafia night kill) and an 'accurate' report from the representative (i mean it would show the godfather as innocent but whatever the representative is still alive!!)
it's probably likely that the representative going with them will be killed off BUT this would also suggest that one of the two ??? are mafia since who would they know to kill but we do lose a report by doing this
i just dont know if in this setup where 2 citizens appear mafia & 2 scum appear town (godfather + revo) if getting peoples alignment outweighs the benefits of possibly blocking 5 mafia (i mean this is pretty unlikely it would really be like 1 probably) since this setup's mafia are very strong power roles