D
Deleted member 4601
Guest
Wait wait wait
D
Deleted member 4601
Guest
Yea it only takes effect if you successfully protect the player oops
not changing my vote tbh
based off the role desc. it seems like that's how it works, except that just makes the claim all the more convenient
still no idea why the town doc wouldn't be as hesitant as possible to claim
based off the role desc. it seems like that's how it works, except that just makes the claim all the more convenient
still no idea why the town doc wouldn't be as hesitant as possible to claim
Mooglie
The Local Cow
if mulb is mafia it would have been more convenient to them to just claim any unprovable doc claim from other games (although following the theory theres only one role from each game (i mean the cult thing sort of screws with that) maybe mulb is mafia from SCP and thus was forced to claim the SCP doctor or else someone else from SCP could have spoken up and ruined things)
i dont think that given our current position (jailer (roleblocker and protection), lie detector, another roleblocker, ??? if comp was an important role) we should really risk lynching a doc claim (also would it be weird to have 2 protection roles in the game actually, but i guess given UNU and sploorky's roles there were 2 roleblocking ones so ???)
I think succesful means that someone tried to kill them and she protected them
I think Unu's role was forced to take people to jail when they shoot someone, so he couldn't jail someone every night. But I agree with you that it seems odd to have this many protective/roleblocking roles
D
Deleted member 4601
Guest
I understand why this would be the reason why people are suspecting me and I'd like to genuinely apologize for the preemptive claim which is a blunder on my part
I do tend to be a bit more sensitive to votes against myself so skimming through the thread after not reading it for a couple of days gave me the impression that there was a bandwagon against me that I had no way of reverting except for a claim which on second reading was clear that it wasn't the case
It was right to claim doc there, if you didn't claim you would just have been bandwagoned. If you claimed later, people wouldn't believe you (look at what happened against Unu).
Right, uh... I’m gonna choose to believe Mulb- I think her story about checks out. With the amount of inactivity this game has, I doubt she’d go through the effort of looking through previous games just for a good role to claim- on top of that, she hinted at what her role does, rather than state it outright, while someone else figured it out. The way she immediately went to check tells me she really did misread it rather than found something convenient.
In the meantime, I’d rather look at those who were voting to lynch her- specifically Jivvi. I dunno, I’m starting to find him suspicious from this :x
In the meantime, I’d rather look at those who were voting to lynch her- specifically Jivvi. I dunno, I’m starting to find him suspicious from this :x
this was my main reason cause i was thinking of the possibility that the doc-with-drawback claim was to allow for claiming less prominent players that wouldn't have been watched. imo better to have a vocal player alive than unable to switch votes
with that said, this:
is a good point so im gonna
unvote
however i still maintain that this is seems to be a poorly balanced setup so who knows what PRs we have