damn, this is some monopoly/mario party level shit
damn, this is some monopoly/mario party level shit
fairBecause I didn't trust Shades claim, and thought they might just be mafia trying to out roles that could screw them over.
Also, there have been two villager reveals already. Finding another right after isn't entirely impossible, but it does feel like a backup claim after being called out by a potential roleblocker.Weary:
-Seems far more defensive in asserting that he is a villager; when there is a claim of him being blocked ln. If that's the case, then just looking at his response; it looks like a scum being correlated due to the fact that one villager is already down so the likelihood of him being a villager is diminished. HOWEVER, he very well validly pointed out that if he was a villager; he would not be able to perform a night action and therefore two options open:
>action is wasted on him/target is failed for the mafia on him
>he's lying
Seems fair, I do wish more people would post :/So let's look at each side, and see who looks more sus:
Weary:
-Seems far more defensive in asserting that he is a villager; when there is a claim of him being blocked ln. If that's the case, then just looking at his response; it looks like a scum being correlated due to the fact that one villager is already down so the likelihood of him being a villager is diminished. HOWEVER, he very well validly pointed out that if he was a villager; he would not be able to perform a night action and therefore two options open:
>action is wasted on him/target is failed for the mafia on him
>he's lying
Blush:
-Seems way too calm, due to it having no CC as of yet. There's two instances which this would make sense:
A) Is actually the role and found good evidence to out himself and therefore has to act calm to not look too fishy in case of a bw (this is escaperestart after all)
B) Is the disguiser, but as someone rightly pointed out; no night kills were performed which doesn't correlate at all to what the standard definition of guiser.
Looking at these instances, I have a gut feeling that A is the more likely option as it correlates very well to Weary's current behaviour. But the issue remains that we can't trust Weary's claim and it's making a lynch more risky to perform on Weary if he's telling the truth. I'll keep my vote until my gut focuses on Weary.
i think weary's vote is pretty over the top considering all blush said was that he had blocked them the previous nightYou are hilarious.
Vote Blush
I think this is zeroing in a bit too much on a specific phrasing, Weary :xSame. I'm still not entirely sure what occured yesterday. Why did Shades claim to have a night gun? How can he receive an item in the middle of the night when as far as I have experienced almost all night actions are executed at the end of the night.
Could you at least give a reason when lynching, please. I know you sort of gave a reason later on, but an immediate counter-lynch with no explanation makes me immediately inclined to lynch you.You are hilarious.
Vote Blush
Why do you immediately assume that Blush is the disguiser, though, as though it’s 100% guaranteed?I would also like to remind everyone how easely Blush could get me lynched with this lie and face no consequences because they would disguise as somebody else tomorrow which would mean he cannot be lynched if he really is the disguiser.
There's also that the mafia haven't had a successful kill since the game started, so it's not possible for guiser to have succeeded.as for the guiser i would be surprised if they had already used their ability (ignoring the lack of a nk), as there hasn't been enough info or enough time for people to make their personalities known for the guiser to switch of them.
Thanks! I've been having a bit of fun; the anonymity this game provides allows more freedom in the way you can act. I hope future games do this too!Blush’s entire demeanor had struck me as off for a bit just for how cheery they are until I realized that they’re quite honestly doing a really good job of channeling the emoji they were given, so I can admire that.
same here dudewhy are pronouns so confusing this game, I keep switching between he and they
Reads are good if you can post them before leaving to sleep, but at least no one has contradicted Blush's claim as of yet.I am sorry everyone, but if you want a more elaborate post from me with suspicions and what not you will have to wait as I am about to go to bed and am in no way able to make such a post now (besides this since I felt I had to say something).
I am not the roleblocker, so I think that means there is no cc on that claim. Do not have any juicy info either, besides my reads if you would consider that juicy.
I can't really verify that without more information. We'd need to reveal more town information but it's probably worth it right now I think? I'll let people discuss first. :)Unamused if you have any night action that could verify me, were you blocked night zero?
So did enough others to get them lynched; you can't really deny that Shades was acting very suspicious and even gave up towards the end of the day.both Weary and Unamused, the claimed blocks, voted for Shades
I think we can be reasonably sure because otherwise that would probably be game throwing?How sure are we that Shades was speaking the truth though?
No item for me.Did anyone get an item today? I did not.
What do you mean by this?I can't really verify that without more information. We'd need to reveal more town information but it's probably worth it right now I think? I'll let people discuss first. :)
So you're a power role, then?I can't really verify that without more information
Nice try, mafia.So you're a power role, then?
Did you perform any action last night?What do you mean by this?
The hell do you mean by this? You're pretty blatantly soft claiming PR. Why do you need Yum to answer?Nice try, mafia.
Did you perform any action last night?