"I can't debunk their valid arguments so instead I'm gonna attack their reasons for saying them"
You really don't care about facts/logic do you. And this coming from the one who was arguing together with me during republic that we shouldn't lynch a Rev claim(which you didn't do just because you were Mafia with me but because you thought it was logical) this is pretty disappointing and only solidifies that you're disregarding logic because you want me dead.
more like "I don't believe what you're saying so I'm saying that"
I don't have to 'debunk' everything you say or I'm scum, sometimes what you say will be a 'valid' argument, that doesn't mean I have to believe you genuinely think that, which I don't
but nice attempt at discrediting me
yeah wasting what is possibly a one shot vigilante on an anti-town (from their perspective since clearly if a "real" vigilante exists I would be anti-town) isn't a waste at all is it
not if you're going to die anyway? why would I waste a 1 shot vig on you if you're gonna be lynched anyway, that doesn't make sense
Since when is a vigilante killing a cc a waste what drugs are you on. Especially because town has no reason to lynch me other than to save Omni from death. If they wanted that they could just ask me not to kill Omni but alas nobody has argued for his life including you instead you want to lynch your town vigilante.
you know this answer to this
if a vigilante cc's you now, even though there's a decent chance you're gonna be lynched anyway since a lot of people doubt your claim, they're just letting themselves known to the mafia
it's like putting up a big 'hey, roleblock me mafia, or kill me so I can't kill you!' sign on their head just so they can ensure your lynch when you're most likely gonna be lynched anyway
'conveniently ignoring' I literally answered this and you ignored my argument by saying killing me with RID/TID would be a waste which is not only stupid because of see above but also because a RID/TID vigilante not only is unable to kill me but unable to kill anyone in this game besides Duffie unless people claim their names/traits which nobody will do incase of a SK.
what are you even argueing against, I think you've misread my post again
I didn't say they won't kill you if they're RID/TID since it's a waste, I meant they'd not kill you because they can't, which is something you keep ignoring by insisting that 'if a real vigilante exists they'll kill me tonight'
Actually why don't you claim your trait since you seem so sure I'm the towns SK/anarchist theres no way there is another SK who can kill by traits you should be safe right?
why is there 'no way' there's another anti town who can kill me via knowing my trait? and what does claiming my trait even do?
"how convenient your town read has changed to a vote on me because I completely changed my behaviour and started acting irrationally and unreasonable and am disregarding all facts and logic you throw at me and also because I'm going out of my way to save Omnis life". Weird reasons to change my town read instead since when is a change in someones behaviour or a post osmeone makes not reason enough to change reads mr "I want to get reads from peoples lynch on Aqua" which are literally gotten by their posts. Are you arguing against people getting different/new reads from posts now? Don't bother answering this because instead of refuting it you'll just say 'You don't believe this' but thats the fun thing about facts Inf they're true regardless if you believe them and regardless if you believe I don't believe them.
oh sorry I forgot that it's a 'fact' that you're telling the truth, my bad
quote where I act 'irrationally and unreasonable and am disregarding all facts and logic you throw at me', quote it and explain where I do that
or don't bother since you know I'll refute it and nobody is going to believe you
yes, it's possible you changed your town read because you changed your read - that doesn't make it a 'fact', nor does it make me have to believe it, because I don't believe it. saying 'ah yes but I could have done this so the fact you 'don't believe it' means you're ignoring facts' makes 0 sense and you know it
but nice strawman attempt!
So glad you asked it's right here conveniently grouped together.
1) I am unCC'd. (#Fact)
1.1) "But a 'real' vigilante wouldn't CC you if they thought you were gonna be lynched!!!!!!!!!!" -> True if I were actually being lynched but I'm not being lynched I have a single vote from Inf (#Fact)
1.2) "We don't know there is a 'real' vigilante!!!" -> Most games have a vigilante in them and assuming we don't have one now is betting on an unlikely scenario. (#Fact you can check the very bottom of my post where I prove that most games have them)
A 'real' vigilante would either CC to prove I'm lying and actually get more votes on me, or kill me during the night since I am their CC. You can argue a 'real' vigilante wouldn't do this but not CCing someone who claims your role and leaving them alive is game throwing BTW. (#Fact)
1.1) you should probably check your facts because that isn't a fact, and plenty of people have voiced suspicion against you
1.2) it's possible we do have a real one but they're a RID/TID, or they don't want to cc you, so this doesn't matter
wrong, you've admitted yourself it's possible they're not ccing you even if they exist, or they have a RID/TID power and so can't kill you during the night, but you're ignoring those possibilities now aren't you, wonder why
"I can't debunk their valid arguments so instead I'm gonna attack their reasons for saying them"
You really don't care about facts/logic do you. And this coming from the one who was arguing together with me during republic that we shouldn't lynch a Rev claim(which you didn't do just because you were Mafia with me but because you thought it was logical) this is pretty disappointing and only solidifies that you're disregarding logic because you want me dead.
yeah wasting what is possibly a one shot vigilante on an anti-town (from their perspective since clearly if a "real" vigilante exists I would be anti-town) isn't a waste at all is it
Since when is a vigilante killing a cc a waste what drugs are you on. Especially because town has no reason to lynch me other than to save Omni from death. If they wanted that they could just ask me not to kill Omni but alas nobody has argued for his life including you instead you want to lynch your town vigilante.
'conveniently ignoring' I literally answered this and you ignored my argument by saying killing me with RID/TID would be a waste which is not only stupid because of see above but also because a RID/TID vigilante not only is unable to kill me but unable to kill anyone in this game besides Duffie unless people claim their names/traits which nobody will do incase of a SK.
Actually why don't you claim your trait since you seem so sure I'm the towns SK/anarchist theres no way there is another SK who can kill by traits you should be safe right?
"how convenient your town read has changed to a vote on me because I completely changed my behaviour and started acting irrationally and unreasonable and am disregarding all facts and logic you throw at me and also because I'm going out of my way to save Omnis life". Weird reasons to change my town read instead since when is a change in someones behaviour or a post osmeone makes not reason enough to change reads mr "I want to get reads from peoples lynch on Aqua" which are literally gotten by their posts. Are you arguing against people getting different/new reads from posts now? Don't bother answering this because instead of refuting it you'll just say 'You don't believe this' but thats the fun thing about facts Inf they're true regardless if you believe them and regardless if you believe I don't believe them.
So glad you asked it's right here conveniently grouped together.
1) I am unCC'd. (#Fact)
1.1) "But a 'real' vigilante wouldn't CC you if they thought you were gonna be lynched!!!!!!!!!!" -> True if I were actually being lynched but I'm not being lynched I have a single vote from Inf (#Fact)
1.2) "We don't know there is a 'real' vigilante!!!" -> Most games have a vigilante in them and assuming we don't have one now is betting on an unlikely scenario. (#Fact you can check the very bottom of my post where I prove that most games have them)
A 'real' vigilante would either CC to prove I'm lying and actually get more votes on me, or kill me during the night since I am their CC. You can argue a 'real' vigilante wouldn't do this but not CCing someone who claims your role and leaving them alive is game throwing BTW. (#Fact)
2) Leaving me alive poses no extra threat if I were the arsonist as you so claim I am. (#Fact)
2.1) That's because if I were infact third party the "real" vigilante would kill me during the night for being their CC and thus I would die. (#Fact)
2.2) I won't be able to kill anyone besides the person I've doused last night. I could douse someone else sure but then nobody would die and you could lynch me tomorrow. (#Fact)
2.2.1) "We don't know that you actually doused omni!1!1!1!" -> You're right good job but I did and you can choose not to believe that if you want.
Lynching your unCC'd town vigilante is stupid, lynching your unCC'd town vigilante who you think is an arsonist that bodes 0 extra threat to keep alive an extra night so they can try and prove themselves is beyond idiotic sorry to say, especially when said 'arsonist' claims to want to kill Omni tonight.
2) agree, that's why I don't mind letting you live, like I've said several times, and why my vote is on TWG rather than on you - although it's possible omni is town and leaving you alive will harm town but I'm not gonna get into that since I don't have a strong belief in omni's alignment
2.1) not a #fact, you've literally already said this which refutes this '#fact':
also because a RID/TID vigilante not only is unable to kill me but unable to kill anyone in this game besides Duffie unless people claim their names/traits which nobody will do incase of a SK.
but you're ignoring this again, but that isn't because you're pushing an agenda here or distorting the truth or anything, you're a pure townie with the best interests of town and truth at your heart!
2) Leaving me alive poses no extra threat if I were the arsonist as you so claim I am. (#Fact)
2.1) That's because if I were infact third party the "real" vigilante would kill me during the night for being their CC and thus I would die. (#Fact)
2.2) I won't be able to kill anyone besides the person I've doused last night. I could douse someone else sure but then nobody would die and you could lynch me tomorrow. (#Fact)
2.2.1) "We don't know that you actually doused omni!1!1!1!" -> You're right good job but I did and you can choose not to believe that if you want.
2.2) agree, so?
2.2.1) I believe it
"I can't debunk their valid arguments so instead I'm gonna attack their reasons for saying them"
You really don't care about facts/logic do you. And this coming from the one who was arguing together with me during republic that we shouldn't lynch a Rev claim(which you didn't do just because you were Mafia with me but because you thought it was logical) this is pretty disappointing and only solidifies that you're disregarding logic because you want me dead.
yeah wasting what is possibly a one shot vigilante on an anti-town (from their perspective since clearly if a "real" vigilante exists I would be anti-town) isn't a waste at all is it
Since when is a vigilante killing a cc a waste what drugs are you on. Especially because town has no reason to lynch me other than to save Omni from death. If they wanted that they could just ask me not to kill Omni but alas nobody has argued for his life including you instead you want to lynch your town vigilante.
'conveniently ignoring' I literally answered this and you ignored my argument by saying killing me with RID/TID would be a waste which is not only stupid because of see above but also because a RID/TID vigilante not only is unable to kill me but unable to kill anyone in this game besides Duffie unless people claim their names/traits which nobody will do incase of a SK.
Actually why don't you claim your trait since you seem so sure I'm the towns SK/anarchist theres no way there is another SK who can kill by traits you should be safe right?
"how convenient your town read has changed to a vote on me because I completely changed my behaviour and started acting irrationally and unreasonable and am disregarding all facts and logic you throw at me and also because I'm going out of my way to save Omnis life". Weird reasons to change my town read instead since when is a change in someones behaviour or a post osmeone makes not reason enough to change reads mr "I want to get reads from peoples lynch on Aqua" which are literally gotten by their posts. Are you arguing against people getting different/new reads from posts now? Don't bother answering this because instead of refuting it you'll just say 'You don't believe this' but thats the fun thing about facts Inf they're true regardless if you believe them and regardless if you believe I don't believe them.
So glad you asked it's right here conveniently grouped together.
1) I am unCC'd. (#Fact)
1.1) "But a 'real' vigilante wouldn't CC you if they thought you were gonna be lynched!!!!!!!!!!" -> True if I were actually being lynched but I'm not being lynched I have a single vote from Inf (#Fact)
1.2) "We don't know there is a 'real' vigilante!!!" -> Most games have a vigilante in them and assuming we don't have one now is betting on an unlikely scenario. (#Fact you can check the very bottom of my post where I prove that most games have them)
A 'real' vigilante would either CC to prove I'm lying and actually get more votes on me, or kill me during the night since I am their CC. You can argue a 'real' vigilante wouldn't do this but not CCing someone who claims your role and leaving them alive is game throwing BTW. (#Fact)
2) Leaving me alive poses no extra threat if I were the arsonist as you so claim I am. (#Fact)
2.1) That's because if I were infact third party the "real" vigilante would kill me during the night for being their CC and thus I would die. (#Fact)
2.2) I won't be able to kill anyone besides the person I've doused last night. I could douse someone else sure but then nobody would die and you could lynch me tomorrow. (#Fact)
2.2.1) "We don't know that you actually doused omni!1!1!1!" -> You're right good job but I did and you can choose not to believe that if you want.
Lynching your unCC'd town vigilante is stupid, lynching your unCC'd town vigilante who you think is an arsonist that bodes 0 extra threat to keep alive an extra night so they can try and prove themselves is beyond idiotic sorry to say, especially when said 'arsonist' claims to want to kill Omni tonight.
why are you acting as though omni is proven mafia?
and I've said several times I'm down for lynching TWG but will go on you if that doesn't happen because I believe you're anti town and there's no better choices than you
screaming that 'I'm harmless until later!' is irelevant because the '#fact' is that I believe you're third party, I believe TWG is mafia, those are my two reads, so those are my two choices, so even if TWG is a bigger threat, if he's not gonna get lynched then I'll support yours
First of all you literally claim you lynched Aqua because you thought it was weird for a setup to have both 'your role' and his role and now tell me assuming a setup because of how most previous setups haven't had such mechanics is a ridiculous request that I would never ask of if I was town. So you're saying you did something ridiculous that you would never do if you were town? Thats not suspicious at all great argument as usual Inf.
wrong, I suspected aqua because the role he claimed made the setup seem unbalanced, not because the role he claimed was out of the 'norm' for what roles most setups have - all setups strive to be balanced
First of all you literally claim you lynched Aqua because you thought it was weird for a setup to have both 'your role' and his role and now tell me assuming a setup because of how most previous setups haven't had such mechanics is a ridiculous request that I would never ask of if I was town. So you're saying you did something ridiculous that you would never do if you were town? Thats not suspicious at all great argument as usual Inf. Assuming a game has a certain layout of setup based on how most of the games are set is perfectly reasonable, I don't see you going into every game saying 'maybe there are two Mafia teams!!!!!!' or 'maybe town has no cop', which is because the layout of most games is how most games of Mafia are played and completely disregarding something likely because 'we don't know that thats true THIS game' is stupid.
maybe you should look in a mirror and wonder why some of us are favouring the idea that you're anti town rather than a vigilante
I don't care if most setups have a vigilante, you're suspicious, so even if you claim vigilante I'm not giving you the benefit of the doubt, because
1) as I've already made clear, it's possible the real vig isn't ccing you
2) as I've already made clear, I think you're lying
letting someone I find incredibly suspicious live just because 'most setups have this role even though I'm not even confirmed to be it' is what I'd call stupid
I've said this before, I'll say it again - I don't care.
83% of games have a vigilante, cool, so 17% don't, and your behaviour makes me put that % to a good 90% because there's no way I'm going to believe you're a town vigilante after the posts you've been making, ignoring your own statements at convenient times, acting as though what you say is fact, dismissing my posts by strawmanning my arguments, none of these things are what notty does as town, so why should I throw away all of that just because there's a 83% chance there's a vigilante in this setup - even when it's entirely possible there is in this one but
it's not you
here's another fun statistic, 0% of previous games have had the role aqua had in this setup
and another one, 0% have had traits/powers
and another, 0% have had a vigilante who works as an arsonist and has to prime targets first and then ignite them
isn't making up statistics to bolster my argument so fun!