I don’t even get it. In other words - its badThat pun was bad and you should feel bad jk I love you Inffy
I don’t even get it. In other words - its badThat pun was bad and you should feel bad jk I love you Inffy
That would benefit the mafia more, we'd all kill ourselves!we all need to just fire every gun at the same time
Well, that's it. I'm not voting for no-snipe because I ain't no coward.IT TAKES SEVEN VOTES TO SNIPE SOME JERK AND SIX VOTES TO CHOOSE NOBODY TO SNIPE TODAY, LIKE COWARDS!
Anarchy.Anyway, I'd like to bring up a more serious topic: Gun use. I'd like to discuss whether everyone think it's better to use guns democratically, with everyone having a say in who gets shot (and possibly who does the shooting) or with leaving the shots totally at the discretion of the holder.
That sounds better than anarchy IMO but we shouldn't be under the illusion that doing things democratically guarantees means that we'll only be shooting at scum.Anyway, I'd like to bring up a more serious topic: Gun use. I'd like to discuss whether everyone think it's better to use guns democratically, with everyone having a say in who gets shot (and possibly who does the shooting) or with leaving the shots totally at the discretion of the holder.
Like yeah, we know that the people with guns are town (Probably? Usually?), but I suppose the main question is how much do we trust people not to be wrong in their targeting?
But you have to remember that the more days that pass the more likely the gunner is to kill themselves. The setup encourages day one madness. Once we have people with a gun come forward we will know they are towniesThat sounds better than anarchy IMO but we shouldn't be under the illusion that doing things democratically guarantees means that we'll only be shooting at scum.
Assuming that gunners have no powers other than their gun, I think it might be better to have cop (assuming we have one) hide for a couple days until they get juicy results and advise gunners to hold their fire until cop or other investigative can help narrow down potential targets somewhat.
It's that every shot fired in the same day increases the chance the gunner kills themselves, not that every day the chance increasesBut you have to remember that the more days that pass the more likely the gunner is to kill themselves. The setup encourages day one madness. Once we have people with a gun come forward we will know they are townies
(for this game it seems more fun I mean, ordinarily it'd probably be annoying to me to have people shooting everywhere but this game has been framed as one not to take too seriously so I'm just having messy chaos for this one!)Also personally I'm fine with people shooting who they want to whenever they want to since I'm not taking this game too seriously and the chaos of shots everywhere sounds more fun than being careful and democratically deciding who to shoot
so I'm happy just having messy chaos for this one*(for this game it seems more fun I mean, ordinarily it'd probably be annoying to me to have people shooting everywhere but this game has been framed as one not to take too seriously so I'm just having messy chaos for this one!)
this is inf wanting to be able to shoot whoever he wants what a barbarian (but tbh i also prefer anarchy)Also personally I'm fine with people shooting who they want to whenever they want to since I'm not taking this game too seriously and the chaos of shots everywhere sounds more fun than being careful and democratically deciding who to shoot
sounds legit to me, also too scared to make people claim thoBut you have to remember that the more days that pass the more likely the gunner is to kill themselves. The setup encourages day one madness. Once we have people with a gun come forward we will know they are townies
But lynching someone is like super duper chaotic!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!11!also does anyone actually want to try to lynch someone today
usually I'd be all for discussing as much as possible but for this game I'm tempted to just vote no lynch to skip to the chaos
oh youre rightBut lynching someone is like super duper chaotic!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!11!
your profile is giving me a headachealso does anyone actually want to try to lynch someone today
usually I'd be all for discussing as much as possible but for this game I'm tempted to just vote no lynch to skip to the chaos
what do you meanyour profile is giving me a headache
the colors that were here but disappearedwhat do you mean
the colors that were here but disappeared
its happening againhow the fuck do i get rid of the weird dancing avatar bc idk how i got it in the first place
IMO the best option for us is to have the two scummiest ppl shoot eachother. If the shot goes through, then great we just eliminated a scummy person. If the shot misses then we removed a gun from a scummy person. If the gun blows up and kills the person shooting then we just killed a scummy person. A win/win/win case really. Or you know... we could just #anarchy this all the way.Anyway, I'd like to bring up a more serious topic: Gun use. I'd like to discuss whether everyone think it's better to use guns democratically, with everyone having a say in who gets shot (and possibly who does the shooting) or with leaving the shots totally at the discretion of the holder.
also does anyone actually want to try to lynch someone today
usually I'd be all for discussing as much as possible but for this game I'm tempted to just vote no lynch to skip to the chaos
Im here for adding to d0 chaosBut lynching someone is like super duper chaotic!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!11!
I don't think every single person has a gun tho, only Gunners (VT equivalents) do.IMO the best option for us is to have the two scummiest ppl shoot eachother. If the shot goes through, then great we just eliminated a scummy person. If the shot misses then we removed a gun from a scummy person. If the gun blows up and kills the person shooting then we just killed a scummy person. A win/win/win case really. Or you know... we could just #anarchy this all the way.