exactly!just like they did with notty huh????????
doubt!
x
xx
exactly!just like they did with notty huh????????
doubt!
x
?Infected_alien8_ - an evil mafia
Ltin - town there is no mafia gunner losers
boo isnt even in this game are you off your rocker???????????Boooo - prob town
?hipmeow - towns saviour
i just took the thingy from the main post so whateverboo isnt even in this game are you off your rocker???????????
2 i thinkHow many votes on Ltin right now?
Would you be open to lynching Unu instead of Ltin? I feel like him mentioning the possibility of roles that can affect the chances of a gunshot hitting followed by HK claiming such a role is connected somehow, and we could get some insight into HK from Unu's lynch and vice versa.and i'm finding UNU incredibly hard to understand which is new and no idea what to make of that
Question 1: What is your name?IS THAT A THREAT I HAVE A GUN DONT TEST ME
probably not, I don't feel anywhere near as suspicious of UNU as I do of ltinWould you be open to lynching Unu instead of Ltin? I feel like him mentioning the possibility of roles that can affect the chances of a gunshot hitting followed by HK claiming such a role is connected somehow, and we could get some insight into HK from Unu's lynch and vice versa.
I guess, I forgot he said that but I don't care anyway since I was voting for him way before that, he gave his defence and it didn't convince me so it doesn't matter if he's afk now or not he's not going to change my mind on finding him shooting me extremely scummy since even if he suddenly comes up with a decent reason for it, I'll just think 'why didn't you say this originally' and still be sus of him anywayPlus switching to Ltin shortly after he said he's not going to be very active feels weirdly opportunistic to me.
personally I don't think it does tie their alignments together*probably not, I don't feel anywhere near as suspicious of UNU as I do of ltin
what insight on hk do you think you'll get after UNU's flip? personally I don't think UNU mentioning roles that can't be shot and hk claiming to be able to make a gun miss doesn't tie their alignment together, so UNU's flip wouldn't change my opinion on hk any
fully sounds like someone trying to act townie, here comes the tunnel uh oh
For context, this was in response to Boo asking if there was a messenger. I personally haven’t played many games with Boo so I’m unsure of their nature in games but I don’t think this was anything to actually dig into. Overall this bit after rereading the thread struck me as a bit odd but as I mention down below, it was day 0 so I’m not reading into this too much.to elaborate to me this sounds like someone trying to act clueless about whats going on because you know town never really gets any info but who knows why am i acting serious on day 0 quick someone make a funny meme
Do not like
Unsnipe
Snipe Hipman
Do not like
Unsnipe
Snipe hipmeow
I know this was day 0 but still, it seems incredibly weird for Hk to state that Ltin is trying to start a bandwagon on Hip when he posted the exact same thing directly after he did. I also know that later in the day Hk states that we shouldn’t take anything he said day 0/early day 1 seriously but I can’t help look at this and read it as him trying to push a lynch on Ltin, who if I remember correctly at this point already had some suspicions.also BIG susp on ltin for trying to start a bandwagon on hip... wtf
This post happened directly before the above one. So for Hk to turn around immediately afterwards and state that Ltin was trying to start the bandwagon on hip when in all reality it was Hk? I still don’t understand the reason behind why Hk wanted to lynch hip so bad and the more I’m reading this the more I’m reading Hk as a hard scum.everyone who does not vote hip is on my hit list for tomorrow
Dislike this post from inffy tbh, it feels like tunneling when even after rereading the thread two times I cannot understand the thought process or why you would want to shoot him. Leading into this I do honestly fully understand the thought process behind why Ltin decided to shoot you (except for the part about him thinking you were lying about having a gun).for real though i am pretty happy to shoot ltin so what does everyone think about that
You already claimed before this. You claimed gunner just the page before this or two pages before this so asking you to claim again would be redundant.btw if im dead KILL LTIN there's 0 way he just shot me like that without asking me to claim first as a townie
So inf were you lying about having a gun
These two posts seem odd to me, but specifically HK’s response. HK’s joking nature aside this seems like he is trying to push a vote onto Inffy who at this point was practically town.yes he was
It should be noted that this was the first vote on HK, immediately after which HK began to panic and defend himself, immediately casting suspicions on hip and hinting that he may be the cop. HOWEVER, from what I am seeing hip’s vote wasn’t unwarranted, I can see the reasoning and I can understand the thought process behind it. Hk the entire game up until then had been essentially trolling around and not taking anything seriously. Looking at this, immediately after hip “called” Hk as mafia Hk voted to lynch him. Again. Even if hip was serious (which let’s face it, that post doesn’t look serious at all), why immediately vote for him? Why retaliate in such a sense that will make people panic? To me it sounds like Hk panicked and was thinking along the lines of “oh shit somebody actually suspects me even though I’ve been only memeing”.i guess i should vote
snipe hk
Looking at this I’m now reading it as Hk trying hard to come across as town sided. Asking people to not lynch Ltin and asking people to look into reasons people would want to kill Notty seems like somebody trying to play town too hard. In addition to this, unless I missed it mentioning that the kill on notty may have been a frame for inffy was the very first time it was mentioned. What I’m thinking with this now is what if that was actually the plan but what if it was Hk’s plan? It seems a bit out of the blue to mention that the kill on notty was done to frame Inffy but looking at it in culmination with arguments to defend ltin, look into notty, and in a sense defending inffy makes it seem very off.*serious input* i agree with hip, mafia gunner seems unlikely to me. Of course we shouldnt write it off completely, but for now there is no justifiable reason to lynch ltin.
We could look more into who would want to kill notty (even if it looks like a frame on inffy, thats proper wifom reasoning).
ill shoot everyone who doesnt vote hk ill find a way dont you worry
Hk’s post above seems almost like a direct response to what appears to be a very obvious joke. Also to be noted that from this point on Hk immediately lost all the memeing he was doing before in the game. While yes this was likely in response to be focused by hip, hip had justifiable reason for doing that. Hk however immediately threw out the idea that Hip was cop AND that he (Hk) was miller.Hip really going after me, I could think of a reason why, but i dont want to say it. Hip, you should reconsider.
Dislike this train of thought. Why shoot somebody who claimed gunner regardless of whether or not they have actually shot yet? It was also mentioned NUMEROUS times that inffy was waiting for more input, a key fact that was ignored.Shooting a scum
Yes. I figured that since he repeatedly said he was going to shoot me, but did not, despite some enthusiastic support for it, that he did not have a gun. Since he kept saying he was going to shoot me in my mind he had claimed gunner.
Also I got impatient with him being like "imma shoot Ltin" and the not shooting Ltin
that leaves me no other options than to come forward with my suspicion.
For context with this, there was 3 hours between these posts.Taking anything i said day 0 and start day 1 remotely serious is naive or big scum.
I was contemplating if i would do this still, but i guess i owe it now.
My thought was, if hip is going for me this hard, he might have a scum inspection on me. This could well be the case, since i just so happen to have the miller trait: i show up mafia-aligned on inspections.
Lowkey hope im wrong about hip, which means he is just going for me for no good reason. I dont know who else to vote, but deadline is in 2 days and the game is moving slow.
I am willing to double down, because i have more i can claim, but to me it would be nice if we just mass claim after that, unless nobody believes me. So id be willing to claim and possibly start the massclaim.
So, im not a gunner, im a gunsaver. What does that mean? I can select a player at night, and the next day, if they are shot, the miss chance becomes 100%. It counts as a shot for successive shots. Remember when inf got shot and he didnt die, ye, i targetted inf last night.
Assuming i would panick in a game im not taking serious after ive been mafia like 4 times in a row is a bold assumption. Also if i didnt have miller trait i would not have considered hip having me as scum, but rather him going after me for no reason. I recal a situation like this one before, not sure when.
I agree with Inffy’s statement on this. The role sounds entirely made up. Hell, even a blacksmith that distributed bullet proof vests is more believableidk what to make of this claim tbh
like i can see it being a thing i guess?
but i can easily see it being either a maf role or a fakeclaim, stemming from you thinking hip was cop and visited you last night so deciding your only way out was to fakeclaim miller (and you wouldn't necessarily need to feel 'panicked' or take the game seriously to do that) and to make your claim a bit more believable you play into the whole ltin missing his shot thing since it conveniently makes sense
and i still struggle to believe we have a miller in a 12 player setup since that seems a bit harsh but would alisha think it was harsh, idk tbh
Agree with this idea however wouldn’t that make your role inherently anti town as was mentioned by Unu? You are essentially a doctor for the mafia. You would be taking away the chances that town has for possibly killing two+ mafia in one day and wasting their gun shots. What part of this sounds town to you?That opinion is not related to my role. It just feels like the game is, vanilla tonwie is gunner. That, to me, leaves no room for mafia gunner. I could be wrong, its just a feel. I guess that could be a weird feel if i consider my role, since, why would i prevent gunner kills if only townies are gunner. I guess town cant be trusted at times. I tried not to take the game to seriously at first and not think things trough a lot. I mean, if it saves me, id be wiling to test the theory out on ltin, but some players eagerness to kill me, since lets be real im not looking to good on surface, worries me.
I really don't think hk was trying to push a lynch on ltin there, it was obvious ltin didn't actually try to start a bandwagon on hip and I'm sure hk knew that he'd never actually get anyone to buy into what he was saying, to me that reads completely as a joke from hkI know this was day 0 but still, it seems incredibly weird for Hk to state that Ltin is trying to start a bandwagon on Hip when he posted the exact same thing directly after he did. I also know that later in the day Hk states that we shouldn’t take anything he said day 0/early day 1 seriously but I can’t help look at this and read it as him trying to push a lynch on Ltin, who if I remember correctly at this point already had some suspicions.
This post happened directly before the above one. So for Hk to turn around immediately afterwards and state that Ltin was trying to start the bandwagon on hip when in all reality it was Hk? I still don’t understand the reason behind why Hk wanted to lynch hip so bad and the more I’m reading this the more I’m reading Hk as a hard scum.
since he imo was unusually defensive day 0 so I was sus of him, so I wanted to get a feel for how others felt about himDislike this post from inffy tbh, it feels like tunneling when even after rereading the thread two times I cannot understand the thought process or why you would want to shoot him.
but that was the entirety of ltin's reported reasoning for shooting me, so if you don't understand that, what part of his thought process do you understand, and did ltin actually say that that was his thought process?Leading into this I do honestly fully understand the thought process behind why Ltin decided to shoot you (except for the part about him thinking you were lying about having a gun).
I didn't claim gunner I said I was up for shooting ltin and asked whether others would be okay with it. I guess I can see why others might assume I'm claiming gunner from that but I mean, it's me, I tell lies about having a fake gun all the time to get reactions, ltin knows thisYou already claimed before this. You claimed gunner just the page before this or two pages before this so asking you to claim again would be redundant.
why are you brushing the fact it's a joke aside and then deciding he's trying to push a lynch on me?These two posts seem odd to me, but specifically HK’s response. HK’s joking nature aside this seems like he is trying to push a vote onto Inffy who at this point was practically town.
I think you're putting your own thought processes and reasoning onto other people since this is the second time where you seem to 'understand' someone's thought process without them actually saying this was their thought process - hip's only reason he ever gave iirc was just that he 'felt' hk was scum and that's it, I can see why hk reacted the way he didIt should be noted that this was the first vote on HK, immediately after which HK began to panic and defend himself, immediately casting suspicions on hip and hinting that he may be the cop. HOWEVER, from what I am seeing hip’s vote wasn’t unwarranted, I can see the reasoning and I can understand the thought process behind it.
why are you fine interpreting hip's vote on hk as a joke yet interpret hk's as serious? I can't decide if I think you're confirmation biased and that's why, or whether you're purposefully trying to frame hk as badIt should be noted that this was the first vote on HK, immediately after which HK began to panic and defend himself, immediately casting suspicions on hip and hinting that he may be the cop. HOWEVER, from what I am seeing hip’s vote wasn’t unwarranted, I can see the reasoning and I can understand the thought process behind it. Hk the entire game up until then had been essentially trolling around and not taking anything seriously. Looking at this, immediately after hip “called” Hk as mafia Hk voted to lynch him. Again. Even if hip was serious (which let’s face it, that post doesn’t look serious at all), why immediately vote for him? Why retaliate in such a sense that will make people panic? To me it sounds like Hk panicked and was thinking along the lines of “oh shit somebody actually suspects me even though I’ve been only memeing”.
why does it seem like he's trying to play town too hard, rather than just trying to help?Looking at this I’m now reading it as Hk trying hard to come across as town sided. Asking people to not lynch Ltin and asking people to look into reasons people would want to kill Notty seems like somebody trying to play town too hard.
I don't think it was strange or anything that he mentioned that, notty did say she was going to shoot me and then died, I was expecting someone to wonder about if I killed her or not when I saw she'd died, and I can see a townie considering that and deciding to mention it at any point in the game, so whilst he said it without being prompted on his opinion of notty's death, that doesn't seem weird to meLooking at this I’m now reading it as Hk trying hard to come across as town sided. Asking people to not lynch Ltin and asking people to look into reasons people would want to kill Notty seems like somebody trying to play town too hard. In addition to this, unless I missed it mentioning that the kill on notty may have been a frame for inffy was the very first time it was mentioned. What I’m thinking with this now is what if that was actually the plan but what if it was Hk’s plan? It seems a bit out of the blue to mention that the kill on notty was done to frame Inffy but looking at it in culmination with arguments to defend ltin, look into notty, and in a sense defending inffy makes it seem very off.
even though I interpreted hip's 'ill shoot everyone who doesn't vote hk' as a joke, I still saw it as him pushing for hk to be lynched and basically saying 'i want hk lynched' but in a jokey way, so I could see hk interpreting it that way too because I automatically did I guessHk’s post above seems almost like a direct response to what appears to be a very obvious joke.
even if hip had a 'justifiable reason' for focusing on hk, why wouldn't hk as a townie begin to be a bit less memey and start to wonder if hip's cop with a guilty on him? (I'm interpreting the bolded part of the quote above as you saying 'yes, this was probably in response to being focused by hip, but hip has a justifiable reason for doing that, so it's weird he became less memey', correct me if I'm wrong)Also to be noted that from this point on Hk immediately lost all the memeing he was doing before in the game. While yes this was likely in response to be focused by hip, hip had justifiable reason for doing that. Hk however immediately threw out the idea that Hip was cop AND that he (Hk) was miller.
yeah I do agree miller is unlikelyas others have mentioned I simply don’t buy a miller trait existing in this game
true it could be that, but I could also see him wanting a massclaim as a townie as well, although I do wonder why specifically he wanted a massclaim there HKCaperALSO the idea of claiming to start a massclaim seems like a futile effort at getting other power roles to claim, especially after he later claims a power role.
from what I saw it was just hip saying he 'felt' hk was scum and pushing on himAlso with this there was no indication whatsoever that hip could have possibly been a cop unless Hk suddenly had that realization himself. Maybe Hk was thinking wait hip could possibly be a cop that might be why he is voting me, but as was mentioned above the reasonings for why hip went after Hk were perfectly understandable from my point of view.
how come it reads that way to you?Ltin: Town. Even if his thought process was a bit absurd at points, I can slightly understand it. However, the major area I’m currently having issues with about him at this point is the continuously missing information about why Inffy was not shooting him. To me this doesn’t read as scum but instead laziness and not reading through the entirety of new posts whenever they happen. My main feelings for him being town though come based off of his gunner claim. I don’t buy the idea that a mafia gunner, WITH a day action exists in a 12-person format.
(to clarify, feels biased because I just don't personally think anyone would feel panicked by that at all)also saying "Why retaliate in such a sense that will make people panic?" seems scummy to me, like making out people will panic because hk voted hip and therefore hk is being anti town or something, seems very biased - again could just be confirmation bias but it's a bit concerning to me
See that's the thing, I agree with you that it was obvious that Ltin wasn't trying to start a bandwagon on hip and I'm sure Hk was aware of that. What I can't ignore though is how Hk is still pushing hip after that. I'm simply stating that I didn't interpret him doing this as a joke.(tl;dr is at the end of this post, it's just me responding to dess/asking hk questions)
I really don't think hk was trying to push a lynch on ltin there, it was obvious ltin didn't actually try to start a bandwagon on hip and I'm sure hk knew that he'd never actually get anyone to buy into what he was saying, to me that reads completely as a joke from hk
It may be because I haven't played mafia in awhile but I didn't see anything he was saying as overly or unusually defense. The major thing I still don't understand though is the continued push for him even after he has, assuming there is no mafia gunner, been proven town.since he imo was unusually defensive day 0 so I was sus of him, so I wanted to get a feel for how others felt about him
Quite honestly I think you are right about this. I think What i might be doing is reading into things a bit too much and substituting my own logic for theirs. However it still stands that I don't think that Ltin shooting you was completely out of line. The way I perceived his logic was "well I'm being threatened with being shot and I am town, I can prove that by shooting Inffy". Looking at it again I can even understand the idea of "wait I haven't been shot yet they might be lying". What I don't understand though is why he would have assumed you were lying in the first place. Somewhere along my post I mentioned that Ltin didn't see or ignored you stating that you were waiting for more opinions before shooting him.(tl;dr is at the end of this post, it's just me responding to dess/asking hk questions)
but that was the entirety of ltin's reported reasoning for shooting me, so if you don't understand that, what part of his thought process do you understand, and did ltin actually say that that was his thought process?
I didn't claim gunner I said I was up for shooting ltin and asked whether others would be okay with it. I guess I can see why others might assume I'm claiming gunner from that but I mean, it's me, I tell lies about having a fake gun all the time to get reactions, ltin knows this
I think you're putting your own thought processes and reasoning onto other people since this is the second time where you seem to 'understand' someone's thought process without them actually saying this was their thought process - hip's only reason he ever gave iirc was just that he 'felt' hk was scum and that's it, I can see why hk reacted the way he did
heres ur mafia people: hk, oog and unu
my job here is done you will thank me in the aftermath
now thats just fake news and uncalled for
i have no chill
snipe ltin
f*ck wrong name, dont I look silly now
unsnipe
snipe HIP
I don't pretend to understand why Hip called those three in particular out as mafia however the reaction, even I can see that Hk was clearly joking around here but going with assumptions that hip didn't see the joke or the joke seemed out of place, that meaning the reactionary vote, I can understand the vote being placed on him.heres ur proof
I said putting his joking nature aside, not the post being a joke or not because quite frankly I didn't think it was one because other people also thought you lied about having a gun, unless I'm still only thinking of Unuwhy are you brushing the fact it's a joke aside and then deciding he's trying to push a lynch on me?
and I think you're vastly underestimating what hk would do as scum tbh, there's no way hk would think 'I know, I'll lie about what inf did so that people will lynch him, it's not like anyone will notice that I'm blatantly lying or that inf could point out I'm wrong and I'll look suspicious'
I think he was joking regardless of his alignment
The reasoning behind why I am not interpreting hk as being a joke is the posts that follow it. Almost immediately after he is voted for by hip he becomes significantly more serious and loses all joking nature. The drastic change in character is what is odd about this. If I was to look at only the individual posts then yes it would be a joke, however his change following this is what drew my attention back towards it.why are you fine interpreting hip's vote on hk as a joke yet interpret hk's as serious? I can't decide if I think you're confirmation biased and that's why, or whether you're purposefully trying to frame hk as bad
also saying "Why retaliate in such a sense that will make people panic?" seems scummy to me, like making out people will panic because hk voted hip and therefore hk is being anti town or something, seems very biased - again could just be confirmation bias but it's a bit concerning to me
To me there is a difference between trying to help and playing too hard. While yes in this case he was slighting aiding in the discussion of Ltin he didn't really help it that much after that one post iirc. Furthermore with this he is also bringing up two different ideas that haven't been discussed once, which yes would ultimately help town it also seems like he is trying to portray himself so hard as town by bringing up three potential issues that need discussing in an attempt to deflect the conversation away from him. If you were to look at his posts following this he never once mentions the idea of Ltin, notty, or even you again.why does it seem like he's trying to play town too hard, rather than just trying to help?
For me this is coming from knowing notty in mafia and knowing how most people are in mafia in regards to you. From my experience a ton of people joke about killing you night 1, myself included however it's never actually done, mafia doesn't even carry through with killing the person that "threatened" you because most likely they can assume you wouldn't make such a rookie mistake. I never once would have questioned if you killed her because you are a seasoned mafia player and you know that would only draw light to you and quite frankly it's more enjoyable having notty in the game longer, something I'm sure you would agree with.I don't think it was strange or anything that he mentioned that, notty did say she was going to shoot me and then died, I was expecting someone to wonder about if I killed her or not when I saw she'd died, and I can see a townie considering that and deciding to mention it at any point in the game, so whilst he said it without being prompted on his opinion of notty's death, that doesn't seem weird to me
also, what about the culmination of the "arguments to defend ltin, look into notty and in a sense defending" me seems very off?
No you're right about my assumption that even if Hk is town that he would have lost the memey behavior but I still think he would have carried over some of and not taken it as seriously but that's just me.even if hip had a 'justifiable reason' for focusing on hk, why wouldn't hk as a townie begin to be a bit less memey and start to wonder if hip's cop with a guilty on him? (I'm interpreting the bolded part of the quote above as you saying 'yes, this was probably in response to being focused by hip, but hip has a justifiable reason for doing that, so it's weird he became less memey', correct me if I'm wrong)
also hk didn't "immediately" throw out the idea hip was cop, he did that after a while of hinting to hip that he should reconsider things, though I agree it was kinda weirdly early to possibly out our cop when it was still possible ltin could be lynched so a response on that would be nice HKCaper
You're absolutely right about him possibly wanting it as a townie but like you are saying the placement of it is weird, if he wanted a massclaim why not go along with it when others, myself included were saying it could be a good idea to have on early on in day 1?true it could be that, but I could also see him wanting a massclaim as a townie as well, although I do wonder why specifically he wanted a massclaim there HKCaper
This is all assuming there is a miller trait in the game, which it seems you and I are in agreeance that there likely is not one.from what I saw it was just hip saying he 'felt' hk was scum and pushing on him
I can totally buy hk, knowing he's a miller, seeing hip push on him and think 'wait it could be that hip's got a report on me', because if I was a miller I'd be a bit paranoid and on the lookout for that happening and I can imagine hk would too
plus hip did something similar two games(?) ago when he was actually cop with a guilty on someone, and hk remembers that since he mentioned it and implied it influenced his realization that hip might be cop this game, so that could've easily happened
This is just a gut feeling, or the vibes /o\ you so commonly use.how come it reads that way to you?
I didnt see ltin as a lynch option at the time, since i felt gunner meant town (like hip).though I agree it was kinda weirdly early to possibly out our cop when it was still possible ltin could be lynched so a response on that would be nice @HKCaper
also I asked hk why he wanted to massclaim and why he claimed miller when he did
I dont agree it was a slight push. At first i was memeing along like the vote i placed on them. As i said earlier at some point the way hip kept on me without a seemingly good reason worried me since i had the miller, and hip seemed to behave as he did earlier game when he had it. Thats why i did it, especially since people were joining in (tim and now dess) giving in my eyes wrong reasoning. Inf's reply to dess' post sums up my opinion quite well on that.His drastic change in mannerisms following a slight push on him,
That's not a terrible idea, but that only verifies his ability and not his alignment. If we do decide to go this route, I volunteer to take the shot.also there is a semi-risky play of just checking hk's role tomorrow by the first gunshot being fired at the person hk claims to have 'protected' but thats somewhat inconclusive because the chance to miss already exists + even if it does miss (regardless of if hk is lying or not) then the shot chance is worse for a second person
i agree that the plan, while it would give more 'proof' for my ability, i think the issue is not so much with the existence of my ability, but more so the miller part and the aligment.That's not a terrible idea, but that only verifies his ability and not his alignment. If we do decide to go this route, I volunteer to take the shot.