Blocktopia Mafia Season 2
- Thread starter Alisha
- Start date
- Status
Thetogolopian
Member
I still don't like the fact that the vigilante took out 2 mafia in 3 nights...
Thanks for your opinion duffie. Looking back natasu said hockey (which is now you) is the doctor. Hockey denied it saying that himself was lying when he illegally told nitasu his role. Being on the zombie tournament team the French toast mafia with hockey, I think he WAS lying when he said his role lying which put the odds against you. If I was a zombie I would say I was the doctor/cop/iron golem to protect myself. Hockey may have been that bit smarter by saying he was the doctor. The REAL doctor wouldn't be able to say he was lying without revealing his/her position. And now the post above…
For the evidence I have obtained I'm going to vote for Thetopolopian
For the evidence I have obtained I'm going to vote for Thetopolopian
kraby1
The Big Red Monster From Hell.
This post kind of made me think you are a baddie.
If you were a good civilian, then you would LIKE the fact the vigilante took out 2 mafia in 3 nights. It's the civilians that want to take out the mafia. But you have said 'I don't like the fact', which pretty much tells me you are a mafia member. So for that post, I am going to vote on Thetogolopian AND because Jk has voted on me, and with the 48 hour limit, this is also my defense. You guys an't lynch me out, I am good. I am needed. You WILL need me.
Thetogolopian
Member
hmmm kinda seems odd that you all jump on me the second time i've said that after I have said I was suspicious of you. The fact you all jumped on me in short order, and 3 votes total makes me think that you are all mafia. 3 mafia left, 3 votes. and the only reason I said what I did is because I think that there might be cheating going around. this is a game meant to be played for the fun of it, not to cheat. If you cheat what's the point? It's like PvPing, you play to test yourself against others, but if you cheat that kinda voids the subject.
balloon98
The balloon that never pops
First off I thought the vigilante was only allowed 1 kill IN THE WHOLE GAME so I don't understand how he got 2 kills. For everyone who voted against Thetogolopian you all just jumped on from 1 piece of evidence like everyone else did which is suspicious. Sure he worded it weirdly but kraby made the same mistake and he is claiming to be good as well. Kraby1
If the vigilante was cheating, then three bad guys would have been dead already. He/she could have just been taking huge risks and ended up paying off well. Besides, there's also the chance that the vigilante caught things that we didn't. The vigilante may actually be very skilled at this game. Who knows (besides the vigilante)? It's kinda like how the skeleton killed two zombies last game. Did killer know they were zombies? Most likely not. He just guessed.
Thetogolopian
Member
not necessarily 3. He/she was probably trying to cover their scent by "mistargeting" the second night.
So you're accusing the vigilante of cheating? Let me just say this; I can tell who cheats, and the vigilante does NOT cheat.
The vigilante gets to target one person a night, but he/she does not have to if he/she does not want to.
The vigilante gets to target one person a night, but he/she does not have to if he/she does not want to.
But why would the vigilante want to mistarget when he/she wins with the village? If he wants the civilians to win, then it's clear that he/she would not want to kill off any civilian or good power role. I could have interpreted that wrong, so can you tell me if I did and clear it up please? :3
And balloon, the vigilante is the exact same as the skeleton, just that he wins with the town. He doesn't just get a single kill.
And balloon, the vigilante is the exact same as the skeleton, just that he wins with the town. He doesn't just get a single kill.
Thetogolopian
Member
to keep suspicion off the fact that he/she is cheating
Thetogolopian
Member
I suppose I could bring up that the last time people jumped on a bandwagon, a cop died. But other than that no. I think this is a poorly thought out plan by the mafia.
Thetogolopian
Member
alright then, ty for clearing that up.
DarthLego5679
That n00b.
This might be the wrong thing to do, and it might come back to bite us if Kraby is a baddie. But I'm playing off the assumption that he is good, like he claims.
That being said, I've decided to cast my vote in favor of 77_is_the_best.
Reasoning? He is RaneOfPane's replacement. Rane was very quiet, and really didn't do much discussing. I've been suspicious of him being bad almost the whole game, because of his actions.
What he meant is that he thought there might have been communications between cop and vigilante, since the vigilante has hit zombies. (Truth be told though, Togo, it's highly probably that it is just luck.) No need to all jump on him for that. If he's a zombie/skele/enderman, feel free to tell me "Told you so!"
More explanations when our family gets back from town later.
Okay, here are my views on each person with votes and abstaining.
kraby1: He can be two things:
1) He is a good role, as he is currently thought of (by most) to be
2) He could be the Enderman, as it is the hardest player to kill, due to the Enderman being shown as a citizen when searched by the cop.Lynching him would help us a lot, but it is an incredibly low chance that he is this (but then again, it's a low chance that we can figure out who actually is the Enderman anyway).
For him, I'm leaning towards the first assumption.
Thetogolopian: After taking my vote off of him, I found something. We all quickly jumped onto his bandwagon, just as we had with killer, because of a fairly small piece of evidence. And killer ended up being someone who we didn't want to lynch. I think togo isn't any power role, though, because there hasn't been any evidence leaning towards it.
77_is_the_best : I need to see his defense before reaching a conclusion. Only pinging him because the deadline is near.
Abstaining: This should only be used as a last resort or when you are waiting for responses. If no evidence points towards anyone or you think that the person with the most suspicion is not suspicious because of multiple facts.
Now, I've also thought up of a couple questions that could lead to suspicion towards you or clear you of it. Ignore the fact that the questions seem hostile, but there is the possibility that they could help raise suspicion against the mafia.
1. Are you a bad power role?
2. If you answered no, explain why you are not lying and use any evidence that has been shown to prove that you are not lying.
Remember, only use the evidence shown. If there is no evidence or suspicion hasn't been raised on you, then no need to put in any evidence. However, you must still give an explanation as to why you are good.
Might be a good idea, might be bad. But one thing's for certain, we need a definite conclusion.
kraby1: He can be two things:
1) He is a good role, as he is currently thought of (by most) to be
2) He could be the Enderman, as it is the hardest player to kill, due to the Enderman being shown as a citizen when searched by the cop.Lynching him would help us a lot, but it is an incredibly low chance that he is this (but then again, it's a low chance that we can figure out who actually is the Enderman anyway).
For him, I'm leaning towards the first assumption.
Thetogolopian: After taking my vote off of him, I found something. We all quickly jumped onto his bandwagon, just as we had with killer, because of a fairly small piece of evidence. And killer ended up being someone who we didn't want to lynch. I think togo isn't any power role, though, because there hasn't been any evidence leaning towards it.
77_is_the_best : I need to see his defense before reaching a conclusion. Only pinging him because the deadline is near.
Abstaining: This should only be used as a last resort or when you are waiting for responses. If no evidence points towards anyone or you think that the person with the most suspicion is not suspicious because of multiple facts.
Now, I've also thought up of a couple questions that could lead to suspicion towards you or clear you of it. Ignore the fact that the questions seem hostile, but there is the possibility that they could help raise suspicion against the mafia.
1. Are you a bad power role?
2. If you answered no, explain why you are not lying and use any evidence that has been shown to prove that you are not lying.
Remember, only use the evidence shown. If there is no evidence or suspicion hasn't been raised on you, then no need to put in any evidence. However, you must still give an explanation as to why you are good.
Might be a good idea, might be bad. But one thing's for certain, we need a definite conclusion.
Thetogolopian
Member
1. No.
2. I'm not sure if there's anything else that I haven't said. If there is, I'll make another one of these.
2. I'm not sure if there's anything else that I haven't said. If there is, I'll make another one of these.
- Status