Mooglie
The Local Cow
I voted for him.I guess we (or atleast I) are going to be pretty right if he is one (Unless 77 threw a false accusation which is a bad idea) so, my vote goes for Defiant_Blob.
I voted for him.I guess we (or atleast I) are going to be pretty right if he is one (Unless 77 threw a false accusation which is a bad idea) so, my vote goes for Defiant_Blob.
I have only voted once, and that was a vote to Harmakpaul at the beginning.Me and Marnixxie voted for him aswell =/
And as you say, they could just be asleep/busy at the time and didn't see the votings.
Derp, mistaken you with Jolteon =PI have only voted once, and that was a vote to Harmakpaul at the beginning.
The last vote I did not have the chance to bring out my vote.
from AlphaOkay, after a couple concerns that have been brought to light I must address this. (Thanks defiant)
1. If you have died in mafia already, PLEASE do not put agree/disagree in other posts, as that essentially means you are communicating even after death.
2. Conversation analyzing is an unreliable way to gain evidence.
and then HarmarkBut could we use agree/disagree if the post has absolutely no relevance to the game?
I fail to see how me asking about agreeing/disagreeing on posts not relevant to the game can be used as evidence against me.from Alpha
and then Harmark
is this suitable evidence? prolly not. but it could be a minor slip up.
HimselfIf you have died in mafia already, PLEASE do not put agree/disagree in other posts, as that essentially means you are communicating even after death.
Alpha typed that himself. (or herself)