Blocktopia Mafia Season 7

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nottykitten

Nomnomnom kitteh!
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Messages
2,041
Reaction score
5,970
See how me making "idiotic" statements gets responses and gets people talking. \o/
Even a fool would know that making such statements would be knocking on Death's door for this one (Not as an insult :u)
To say that you are trying to make "idiotic" statements to get people talking seems more as an last minute excuse despite knowing very well such statements would make yourself very suspicious.
It wasn't an excuse. It was a statement. It was to say that suddenly after my vote and statement the thread went into activity.
The thing is, what are you trying to get at?
But what I'm trying to get at: vote Jeff. And if he's mafia I say you are too.
 

Nottykitten

Nomnomnom kitteh!
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Messages
2,041
Reaction score
5,970
You seem to be acting irrational all of a sudden. What makes you think they're mafia if they have said almost nothing?
The fact that I currently don't suspect the talking people. That makes the non-talking people suspicious to me. And because I think Grimm and Jeff are in a team.

Now a question back: Who are you going to vote for.
 

HarmakAnna

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
739
Reaction score
944
I'm... somewhat surprised that no one brought up th' fact that I haven't been talkin' too much when I normally discussed quite a bit in other seasons. Part of it, I'll blame on th' alerts messin' up constantly and th' other part I'll blame on my laziness.

In regards to th' vigilante, I wanna know why Jk decided t' name who he thinks is th' vig when it's better t' leave him/her be and let 'em do what they think is right.

Also, has there yet t' be a night where th' vig has decided t' not attack? Because I don't think there has been. I think th' vig should probably try and be a little bit more sure on th' people that (s)he's attacking so we don't end up with dead civilians.

Who am I suspicious of? There are various people that I'm suspicious of. I always take th' more talkative people with caution, since most of th' time, they know how to make themselves seem innocent even when they are really mafia/killer, see Jk last season. I won't name any of my suspicions ye, but I want these questions answered.

To Jk, why reveal who you think is vig and how would it help th' town?
To everyone, how do you see yourself as suspicious?
Why start lynching th' quiet people when they are just as likely t' be mafia or 3rd party as they are t' be town-sided?

And one more thing: let's remember that th' traitor is in th' game. So they might be town-sided or they might be mafia-sided right now. Has anyone noticed some sort of change in someone's play style within these few days?
 

Nottykitten

Nomnomnom kitteh!
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Messages
2,041
Reaction score
5,970
To everyone, how do you see yourself as suspicious?
I am very suspicious. But my excuses seem decent.
Why start lynching th' quiet people when they are just as likely t' be mafia or 3rd party as they are t' be town-sided?
Because last mafia (or the one before that) a random shot was taken at Mario and he turned out to be the godfather. There were no suspicions on him, just a random lynch. They took their chances then. And I am taking my chances now. Also because I don't suspect the talking people currently.
 

Jee

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
343
Reaction score
502
After going through all the posts in front and taking Defiant's advice on page 7,
I formally vote to lynch Nottykitten.
The reason, I have to say, I'm too lazy to type it out. So follow Defiant's clues on page 7 and trace it back to the people killed and these what I've said these few pages.
 

Jivvi

Member
Mafia Host
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
2,769
Reaction score
4,596
Also, I love how people are ignoring this, HarmakPaul, don't you?
Do not skip these again, please. The face that they are both long and against the holy JK seems to have made yu ignore them. These are where my suspicions lie.
Aight, here we go.

Right off the bat, I'll admit to jumping on the bandwagon to start with. I didn't really think it through. I just went 'Okay, he's throwing votes around and stuff. That isn't good" and voted for him. Probably the stupidest thing I've done all game. I decided not to properly go over it, because, I was getting sick of the quiet day, and wanted it to move forward. Then why nit say so, you ask? People vote for random people and say it's to wake them up, but even if that is true, everyone jumps on them like a kitten on catnip. I voted for super because I didn't want to stick out all over again. did it with Storm, and I was hoping like hell that he wasn't mafia, 'cause then I'd be next for sure .No one threw accusations at me, however, for whatever reason, and I turned out to be right: Storm only defense, in the end.
My position on the matter was similar to Hype's -
I'm not exactly ready to throw super under the bus just yet but.. "Because yolo" makes me seriously question his reliability
We are like some kind of cult, we all lock our minds on one idea, anyone else has to die. This was what I was scared of; being pulled up for suppourting yet another guy who's under the hammer. And I didn't get bumped off for that, I'd surely get killed off once someone ends up to be the mafia. After it got quiet today, I slowed down too, and I haven't quite got back up to speed yet. I'm reading through again now, also smashing my head into my desk repeatedly, having made mistakes that could cost me my life here. I was still back with the morning wake-up when the afternoon goldrush started. I was still throwing around ideas, poking people with votes while others were reaching conclucions, and it's seems to have been bad for my health. Retracting my vote because I am stupid.

Back to this whole trust thing everyone, especially JK, is emphasizing that you can't thrust anyone. That's partially true. For a true understanding of where someone's loyalty lies, you must begin with an unbias, and remain with it until you reach your conclusion, as I did with Storm, but not, I regret, here. You must have that underlying suspicion of everyone at all times, but a small amount of trust in each, also.
Moving on to the claims of JK concerning the vigilante. I don't understand why any truly town-sided players would reveal their suspicions on the vigi's identity, especially such an experienced player who is obviously skilled at deducing people's roles. Unless he is not town-sided, which he is leading me to believe. For surely only a serial killer would be concerned by the vigilante at this early stage of the game, as serial killers are a team of one, ad have that same number of chances. The mafia, however, may know the vigilante, or even the serial killer, but they will surely kill them when the time is right. Because the serial killer and vigilante have only managed to kill one anti-town role out of the six that have been killed in the night. One of these was the doctor, who was targeted by both. When you think about it, why wouldn't the mafia let the vig and the killer stick around? Even the vigilante is doing more harm than good. Does this lead you to belive that the vigi is useless to us, and should be killed before he does an more damage, JK? You didn't quite elaborate on why. You merely stated that you believed that Notty was the vigilante, essentially throwing him under the bus, while throwing that glob of logic at me will likely turn all heads and get me lynched. As possibly the most frequent posters in this thread, Notty and I have provided a lot of insight into the day gone behind us. Is this something a townie is likely to want to risk, let alone lead the extortionist racket themselves? Yes, good people, that's right. I'm laying the suspicion on JKangaroo. Logic is not flawless. Make something idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot.

Why, JK do you want to expose the vigilante to the mafia and the killer and eliminate the two most frequent speakers of the game. Forget things not adding up right. This is just plain and simple suspicious, I mean, why would you even want to expose the vigi, besides the reasons above? You'll even have the vigilante themself on your back. Obviously no town-sided role would risk this. I would like to hear more from you, JK, and not one of your massive beating-round-the-bush piles of text. A shorter, concise reasoning on exactly why you've got it in for Notty and/as the Vigi. I am extremely suspicious of you now, JK, although I won't make the same mistake twice. I'm not voting for you yet; I would like to hear other opinions.

Apologies for holey logic, guys, if you find some
x3
I'm... somewhat surprised that no one brought up th' fact that I haven't been talkin' too much when I normally discussed quite a bit in other seasons. Part of it, I'll blame on th' alerts messin' up constantly and th' other part I'll blame on my laziness.

In regards to th' vigilante, I wanna know why Jk decided t' name who he thinks is th' vig when it's better t' leave him/her be and let 'em do what they think is right.

Also, has there yet t' be a night where th' vig has decided t' not attack? Because I don't think there has been. I think th' vig should probably try and be a little bit more sure on th' people that (s)he's attacking so we don't end up with dead civilians.

Who am I suspicious of? There are various people that I'm suspicious of. I always take th' more talkative people with caution, since most of th' time, they know how to make themselves seem innocent even when they are really mafia/killer, see Jk last season. I won't name any of my suspicions ye, but I want these questions answered.

To Jk, why reveal who you think is vig and how would it help th' town?
To everyone, how do you see yourself as suspicious?
Why start lynching th' quiet people when they are just as likely t' be mafia or 3rd party as they are t' be town-sided?

And one more thing: let's remember that th' traitor is in th' game. So they might be town-sided or they might be mafia-sided right now. Has anyone noticed some sort of change in someone's play style within these few days?
 

Ltin

Member
Mafia Host
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,481

Jeff0521

OPtimistic
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
347
Reaction score
986
Jeff supported dillon. You replace dillon. You support jeff.

I never supported Dillon, at all. I was only giving the reason why he was inactive. Also your assumptions and jumping to conclusions on literally everything in this thread is getting me quite suspicious of you.
And it's annoying.



I often find myself not getting alerts for this thread and having to read pages at a time to catch up. :x
 

Nottykitten

Nomnomnom kitteh!
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Messages
2,041
Reaction score
5,970
Is it? Because then the traitor could tell us who is not mafia....
Nvm, found it. So that does mean the traitor can help us and tell who is innocent.
why ould the traitpr traitor do that? Hes a traitor of th town no t the mafia.
Because the traitor is just a name. The traitor is town-sided until it investigates a mafia member. If the traitor doesn't find a mafia member on night 1, the traitor can choose to investigate that person every night so that he/she will never join the mafia. [Right, @alpha01 ?] And thus be town-sided. And can also be a second "cop" to prove people are innocent. It all depends on what the traitor chooses to do. As he/she is townsided untill invetigating a mafia.

I'm not too sure what to say about the two votes on me. Other than the fact that the first one was made by a person I accused. Second vote from Ltin seems legit. [not a joke, I think its not suspicious]
Voting me is entirely your choice, but I'm just saying it's a bad idea. I'm a towny, and I probabily will be hit tonight by the mafia/serial killer anyways as a skilled player accused me of being the vigilante.
 

Jee

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
343
Reaction score
502
To address what notty said and possibly what others' views on the choice that I have made:
Do I know that doing this will make me seem very suspicious, provided that notty originally accused me?
Yes, I absolutely do. However, I know that doing so will have its risks, as well as its favours. However, I am very willing to take the risk.

Do I know that I am making a very "stupid" move that could "give me away"?
I have nothing to fear, and I do not think this is a stupid move. I know that it will lead to people generalising that I am the mafia or some shit because notty accused me to be one, but I think it is worth it.

Your reason to lynch is stupid!
I have my reasons for lynching, I have my regrets for voting notty, though not because people will think of me as someone from the mafia. That's all of the information I can give.

Whatever! I still think you are very suspicious!
K.
 

Alisha

Member
Mafia Host
Mafia Mod
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
805
Reaction score
2,829
Vote Count

superstein-2(Old_Man_Oak_63, Dessern5)
Jivvi-1(JKangaroo)
Jeff0521-2(Nottykitten, HypeBurst)
Nottykitten-2(Grimmjowforever, Ltin)

With 14 left, it takes 8 to lynch.

Jivvi JKangaroo voted for you, not the other way around.

The traitor does get investigations, but the traitor is only told if a person is mafia sided or not. Specific roles are not revealed. The traitor starts out town sided, but if they find a mafia member switch to mafia sided.
 

Nottykitten

Nomnomnom kitteh!
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Messages
2,041
Reaction score
5,970
Vote Count

superstein-2(Old_Man_Oak_63, Dessern5)
Jivvi-1(JKangaroo)
Jeff0521-2(Nottykitten, HypeBurst)
Nottykitten-2(Grimmjowforever, Ltin)

With 14 left, it takes 8 to lynch.

Jivvi JKangaroo voted for you, not the other way around.

The traitor does get investigations, but the traitor is only told if a person is mafia sided or not. Specific roles are not revealed. The traitor starts out town sided, but if they find a mafia member switch to mafia sided.
I posed my question poorly, what I meant to ask is if the traitor could investigate the same person over and over again at night.

And I keep saying investigate because I don't know another word for it. But the traitor does know if a person is mafia or not. So it's sort of investigating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top