Blocktopia Mafia Season 7
- Thread starter Alisha
- Start date
- Status
I set deadlines based on the level of activity, and I generally set mental deadlines before creating real ones. My last one passed an hour ago, so here it is.
48 hour time limit. I wish it didn't have to come to this.
48 hour time limit. I wish it didn't have to come to this.
Nottykitten
Nomnomnom kitteh!
There are alot of opinions here. Here is my opinion on the votings.
A vote on jivvi. (I think he's innocent)
A vote on jeff. (I think he's mafia. Maybe even contact)
A lot of votes on JK. (I currently think he's innocent)
A vote on 77. (I had a dream he was mafia. Mafia maybe? =3. But not sure what he is.)
I find the best thing to do is voting jeff. There are 48 hours to decide on that.
A vote on jivvi. (I think he's innocent)
A vote on jeff. (I think he's mafia. Maybe even contact)
A lot of votes on JK. (I currently think he's innocent)
A vote on 77. (I had a dream he was mafia. Mafia maybe? =3. But not sure what he is.)
I find the best thing to do is voting jeff. There are 48 hours to decide on that.
Nottykitten
Nomnomnom kitteh!
Just throwing this in here:
Sploorky since the rules have changed, you can only speak your last message this day.
Meaning if you want to say something you've got 48 hours from alpha's post to do so.
Sploorky since the rules have changed, you can only speak your last message this day.
Meaning if you want to say something you've got 48 hours from alpha's post to do so.
Oak Milk
Kill Hungry Thirsty Dead
A random role just thrown out there? Seriously? I'm shocked out how people have managed to ignore your silent antics, bandwagoning, vote switching, the numerous times you and superstein have managed to cover for each other. Its just really starting to get on my nerves how everyone seems to ignore this in favour of the Jk-Jivvi battle, which in the end seems like its going to end up with us possibly losing a power role. It's quite possible I've overreacted in my vote for JK, however seemingly I've had to overreact on everything just to get people to actually examine or respond to it. I'm honestly quite tired of it, when you play this game you must look at all the evidence that everyone provides, faliure to do this is what leads to mislynches, which right now I feel is probably what is going to happen here.
So right now I'm going to apply a bit of pressure and vote to lynch 77_is_the_best
Well, obviously, with the time limit and two major conflicts on our hands, we need to vote as a group to get anywhere. Since more attention has been drawn to this conflict, we should all look at this for the time being.
I vote for 77_is_the_best: you weren't quite as suspicious in my eyes, but I can see how a lot of your statements don't add up; and that roleclaim just thrown out there seems to be a last-ditch attempt at throwing off Oakie.
I vote for 77_is_the_best: you weren't quite as suspicious in my eyes, but I can see how a lot of your statements don't add up; and that roleclaim just thrown out there seems to be a last-ditch attempt at throwing off Oakie.
I did claim since you guys we starting to get suspicious of my random lynches which I have been trying to help the town. I wanted to clear it up early that I am only a civilian but whatever. I guess you guys can lynch me, civilian isn't that fun to play anyway. xP
And now we see why I voted for 77.
He just admitted that his votes were random. Why would anyone do that?? The chances of finding someone that is town is fairly high if you do that. No towny in their right mind would do that. Assuming he is towny, that would make him not in his right mind. And that is very dangerous as well. I actually belive myself that 77 is the traitor, seeing as the traitor doesnt belong tp the mafia yet, he cpud be consodered a civilliian.
He just admitted that his votes were random. Why would anyone do that?? The chances of finding someone that is town is fairly high if you do that. No towny in their right mind would do that. Assuming he is towny, that would make him not in his right mind. And that is very dangerous as well. I actually belive myself that 77 is the traitor, seeing as the traitor doesnt belong tp the mafia yet, he cpud be consodered a civilliian.
Do you know that you are simply naming the names of all those people others found suspicious?
Your excuses don't seem strong with a lot of effort put in at all. I would like to hear a proper reply on how you feel before the 24 hour limit is up. If you were mafia, you would go,"Dang it they caught me." and find any lazy excuse to stop people from voting you off. Whereas a civilian, would put in more effort and feelings to prove their innocence because they feel wrongly accused.
JKangaroo
Your Local, Neighborhood Marsupial
Honestly, this whole 77 thing feels really silly, and really just appears to be a desperation attempt to lynch SOMEBODY just to get the day over with, which actually just becomes a rash number of bandwagons on really small reasons. In fact, this whole 77 debacle (which seems to be exclusively to this page) feels really just like another bandwagony-nonsense that began the (short-lived) bandwagon's on Super, then Jeff (why was that even a problem with Jeff? seriously? over a little friendly reason on why he's not here, especially since they know each other in real life? A bit desperate there for a lynch, no?), then to Notty (which seems to just be a repeat of last-season's Notty situation on Day 1) and now to 77 on--- what exactly?
In fact, the only reason I'm actually seeing of people actually voting for 77 is because of:
Why aren't you suspicious of Notty after his role-claim? Because he had a longer post then merely a simple statement? What more do you want? The idea of super claiming seemed to get a lot of flak; despite him almost being lynched anyways when was the best time to claim. 77 is about to get lynched, might as well throw out a role-claim.
In fact, this "superstein and 77 cover-up" seems--- not that important, and I've rarely seen it at all. If anything, the Notty/Jivvi covering for each other / pairing seem much more suspicious then anything 77 and Super have said to each other.
What are you trying to prove here when there are actually so many other possibilities then these, honestly, blown-up ideas on a specific player.
Because that's all I'm seeing being the argument against 77: Blown-up and extreme ideas to try and back up a claim when the evidence is actually fairly shallow.
You know what the chances of finding anyone apart of the Mafia or anti-town?: Fairly low. So of course there's going to be the extreme likeness of us finding a town-player; that's just how the game tends to work.
And yet, despite that, why do people randomly vote? Well, once more as I explained in my post that can actually be relate-able seems that people tend to do this cause well, people have hunches, people have those "feelings" that really, no one actually has the ability to explain because it's apart of our subconscious. I know an excuse some people use just to make random votes: "Oh, well, it's to start discussion" they say; which I find overdone and preposterous if you're just going to vote to start a discussion, which normally just puts suspicion on you and we end up with a mis-lynch.
Ugh-- actually, it's too hard to explain this besides just saying, Ltin, you're harboring the "stereoytypical townie" to much as a bias. People have playstyles, and really, from my experience of watching 77 play, this is actually kind of common from 77. Why would anyone do that?: Maybe you're just not the person in question. What if they think it's a good idea? Can they explain it in such a way that sounds "trust-worthy?" You don't know.
...
This all just feels like a blown-up mislynch.
I'm in no mind of voting 77 unless ACTUAL evidence is presented. Seeing as no matter what, 77 is going to be lynch anyways, should actually turn out to be anti-town, I'll eat my words from it, but until then, I severely condone this action.
As it stands, I remain adamant in my vote for Jivvi. After reading Oak's response with "77 and super watching each other's backs," Jivvi/Notty team-up seems more relate-able to this idea then anything I've seen 77 and Super do so far in the game, and that just makes me more suspicious of Jivvi if anything.
I'm actually getting more suspicious of both Oak and Ltin. Doesn't matter if I have no proof, it's a suspicion, everyone can have that... unless that's changed in this recent Mafia season that is.
Meh, that's just my rambling opinion. The day's basically over anyways, there isn't much time left for opinions.
Honestly, I'm ignoring because I feel there's no point to this battle at all, nor do I see the evidence against it.
In fact, the only reason I'm actually seeing of people actually voting for 77 is because of:
Hehe, I just love how for some role-claims, we can just happen to not care or be suspicious about it that much on certain players, while on others we go ballistic and jump to radical conclusions and just generally walk all over that role-claim on another person.
Why aren't you suspicious of Notty after his role-claim? Because he had a longer post then merely a simple statement? What more do you want? The idea of super claiming seemed to get a lot of flak; despite him almost being lynched anyways when was the best time to claim. 77 is about to get lynched, might as well throw out a role-claim.
In fact, this "superstein and 77 cover-up" seems--- not that important, and I've rarely seen it at all. If anything, the Notty/Jivvi covering for each other / pairing seem much more suspicious then anything 77 and Super have said to each other.
What are you trying to prove here when there are actually so many other possibilities then these, honestly, blown-up ideas on a specific player.
Because that's all I'm seeing being the argument against 77: Blown-up and extreme ideas to try and back up a claim when the evidence is actually fairly shallow.
Once again we end up in the extremely silly "stereotypical townie" idea that Jivvi and what seems to be a few others now seem to occupy as their bias, and honestly I hate it.
You know what the chances of finding anyone apart of the Mafia or anti-town?: Fairly low. So of course there's going to be the extreme likeness of us finding a town-player; that's just how the game tends to work.
Ugh-- actually, it's too hard to explain this besides just saying, Ltin, you're harboring the "stereoytypical townie" to much as a bias. People have playstyles, and really, from my experience of watching 77 play, this is actually kind of common from 77. Why would anyone do that?: Maybe you're just not the person in question. What if they think it's a good idea? Can they explain it in such a way that sounds "trust-worthy?" You don't know.
...
This all just feels like a blown-up mislynch.
I'm in no mind of voting 77 unless ACTUAL evidence is presented. Seeing as no matter what, 77 is going to be lynch anyways, should actually turn out to be anti-town, I'll eat my words from it, but until then, I severely condone this action.
As it stands, I remain adamant in my vote for Jivvi. After reading Oak's response with "77 and super watching each other's backs," Jivvi/Notty team-up seems more relate-able to this idea then anything I've seen 77 and Super do so far in the game, and that just makes me more suspicious of Jivvi if anything.
I'm actually getting more suspicious of both Oak and Ltin. Doesn't matter if I have no proof, it's a suspicion, everyone can have that... unless that's changed in this recent Mafia season that is.
Meh, that's just my rambling opinion. The day's basically over anyways, there isn't much time left for opinions.
- Status