Sploorky
Member
If the blocker claims and tells us who they blocked we may find the silencer considering everybody could speak day 2does it tell you when blocker blocks you?
if so can the person blocked n1 and n2 come forward pls
If the blocker claims and tells us who they blocked we may find the silencer considering everybody could speak day 2does it tell you when blocker blocks you?
if so can the person blocked n1 and n2 come forward pls
My entire role is about claiming names and my initial suspicions on arelic was based on our similar names, which is why I mentioned it. Otherwise I generally agree with youI don't think we should be claiming our actual names. I don't see the point of it. If we are to claim, just claim roles. Claiming names has no benefit but might have negative downsides.
Matty/uhtr, I wanted to use my role to investigate quiet people because I assumed their were more powerful investigative roles that would hopefully investigate more suspicious folks.i believe it
who did you investigate last night?
Arelic i want you to respond to this ASAP, with a roleclaim and possibly investigation results
i'd prefer it if blocked people came forward first tho or else blocker has to claimIf the blocker claims and tells us who they blocked we may find the silencer considering everybody could speak day 2
I was planning to make a post about role names, floors, and a possible third party but then the arelic thing took precedence. I think this is something we should all discuss, I'll type out my thoughts on it later tonignti'd prefer it if blocked people came forward first tho or else blocker has to claim
and if blocked people dont come forward in x amount of time then blocker claims and the people who didnt claim are likely mafia
also there (theoretically) being a role cop on both mafia and town sides that do get the names implies that names are probably important to third parties only or not at all?? it makes sense in my head atleast
Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. I don't think we should claim our people names like Sam, Rachael, Joe etc.My entire role is about claiming names and my initial suspicions on arelic was based on our similar names, which is why I mentioned it. Otherwise I generally agree with you
i understand the sarcasm buthow did u know????
i feel like if hip’s the silencer he wouldn’t have admitted being blocked?i understand the sarcasm but
hk (mafia roleblocker) claims to have blocked comp n1 and n2
inf was silenced n1 = comp isnt silencer (or comp and hk are both mafia)
noone was silenced n2 = whoever was blocked is probs silencer / silencing is bidaily (which could make sense given its a role that kills activity aka a super dumb role in a forum game)
notty was silenced n3 = whoever is silencer was blocked n2 wasnt blocked n3, iggy was blocked n3 = you werent blocked n2 = youre the silencer
roleblocker would have (like i said) come forwardstill dumb to claim i was blocked if i was silencer. u think id make that big of a risk as mafia
well ok sure im silencer u got meadmittedly having the roleblocker claim would be in mafias best interest but you could have claimed for the exact reason of using this argument
Well, do you have a night action and if you do, did it say that the night action wouldn't go through?hey i dont even know if i WAS blocked i just got a message on the second night saying my computer exploded
i mean it didnt directly say my action didnt go through but i guess that pretty much what its sayingWell, do you have a night action and if you do, did it say that the night action wouldn't go through?