so sharing valuable info inffy told me before he died, and not wanting to share info i feel could harm town makes me seem extremely guilty?you seem extremely guilty
so sharing valuable info inffy told me before he died, and not wanting to share info i feel could harm town makes me seem extremely guilty?you seem extremely guilty
May we know what floor(I'm assuming ground floor/reception) and who (or atleast how many) people are in it?i am
dess' idea of freelancers and hk's elevator guy make sense with the theme but game mechanics-wise im not exactly sure. my chat was open both nights
wait i just realized this game is probably using the european way of counting floors (time to relearn that)May we know what floor(I'm assuming ground floor/reception) and who (or atleast how many) people are in it?
Why does the idea that the other person in your group chat could be keeping quiet to make you look guilty not worry you? Why is this not a thing you have responded to? Why does the idea that this person could be mafia and is planning to kill you tonight not have you respond.so sharing valuable info inffy told me before he died, and not wanting to share info i feel could harm town makes me seem extremely guilty?
as i said, we were under the impression info about who is on what floor/room could be usefull for a potential third party.Why does the idea that the other person in your group chat could be keeping quiet to make you look guilty not worry you? Why is this not a thing you have responded to? Why does the idea that this person could be mafia and is planning to kill you tonight not have you respond.
This all could happen. Why are you not worried about it?
also, id like to point out that its extremely unlikely there are players without a floor. considering all rooms seem to have 3/4 players in them, weak is the only player in the basement, and arelic the only player on ground floor. that means that, all things considered, 7 players who havent claimed a floor / claimed to not have a floor, are probably also on one of the floors.May we know what floor(I'm assuming ground floor/reception) and who (or atleast how many) people are in it?
Currently I have this list of floors&stuff which I made a table for readability:
[xtable=skin1]
{tbody}
{tr}
{td}Floor{/td}
{td}People{/td}
{/tr}
{tr=@x15}
{td=@x15}Board room{/td}
{td=@x15}Notty, Dess, Danni{/td}
{/tr}
{tr=@x15}
{td=@x15}HR (3rd){/td}
{td=@x15}Hk, Inf, ???{/td}
{/tr}
{tr=@x15}
{td=@x15}Marketing (2nd){/td}
{td=@x15}Jolt, Iggish, 77th, Jivvi{/td}
{/tr}
{tr=@x15}
{td=@x15}??? (1st){/td}
{td=@x15}Matty, Purple, Rune{/td}
{/tr}
{tr=@x15}
{td=@x15}Basement{/td}
{td=@x15}Weak(?){/td}
{/tr}
{tr=@x15}
{td=@x15}No claimed floor yet{/td}
{td=@x15}Mul, Oog, Unu, Hip, Ender, Arelic, Sploorky, Comp{/td}
{/tr}
{/tbody}
[/xtable]
Sooooo, every day they move up a floor? And maybe after moving up, they disable the nightchat, which could explain why the basement is out of order.[JUSTIFY]do with this all you like, i just thought it'd be a nice theory to throw into the mix:
all we know: there is an autocrat-esque role and there are floors, each with info on what level they are
I'm not sure how or in what form this could be, but perhaps the autocrat-esque role wins when they reach the top floor[/JUSTIFY]
well, moving up 1 floor each day would take to long, but it could def have something to do with players' floor and role, hence one of the reason i think it'd be smart to hold on to as much information concerning this as we still can.Sooooo, every day they move up a floor? And maybe after moving up, they disable the nightchat, which could explain why the basement is out of order.
They probably would have to pick someone in the department they are aiming for to go up. Which would make all this claiming a bad idea but Owell.
I'm not responding to that because you could be supplying better proof, such as who is in your chat and why they have not yet confirmed what you saidas i said, we were under the impression info about who is on what floor/room could be usefull for a potential third party.
ofc there is the possibility the last person in my night chat is mafia, but im still leaving it to them to reveal themselves. i said i would allow them to reveal themselves, so im not coming back on that
More importantly, why are you not responding to the likely proof i gave about inffy actually being silenced?
So you are ignoring the proof right in front of you/ dont want to even adress it in any way, since you rather have me out the person in my chat even though they dont want me to and i think it could be risky to?I'm not responding to that because you could be supplying better proof, such as who is in your chat and why they have not yet confirmed what you said
Not really anyone at the moment. Notty seems very aggressive but she's always like that so idk. Sploorky is also playing in a similar fashion but I don't recall playing with him before so I don't know his playing style.WHO DO YOU FIND SUSPICIOUS?
I don't really have any reasons to trust anyone right now. No-one is giving me strong townie vibes.WHO DON'T YOU FIND SUSPICIOUS?
Probably go for a no-fire unless more information comes to light.WHO DO YOU WANT TO FIRE TODAY? (OR DO YOU WANT TO NO FIRE AGAIN)
Basically nothing. My chat has been dead.(if you have revealed your night chat/have something so important its worth revealing)HAS ANYTHING BEEN SAID DURING THE PAST 2 NIGHTS THAT SEEMED OFF?
I'm not sure but he probably doesn't belong to a room.(optional)WHAT DO YOU THINK COULD BE THE DEAL WITH THE AUTOCRAT-EQSUE ROLE?
i want you to answer me this: why would i lie about inffy saying he was silenced, and make up all those reads, when i c0uld just have kept my mouth shut?I'm not responding to that because you could be supplying better proof
well we discussed the possiblity of a third party benefiting from knowning the night chat rooms/floors, and im sure the person has read the thread by now and chose not to reveal themselves?
Did they say that they didn't want to be exposed in your night chat?
This is scummy tbh why would you ever want to no-fire todayProbably go for a no-fire unless more information comes to light.
Often in mafia games, no lynch votes will require one less person than lynch votes in the case of an odd number of players. If your proof was that it was 10 people needed to no fire, then why did it still say 11 votes to fire?WAIT, i realized i had forgotten inffy also provided a 'proof' of being lynched. when looking back at it this 'proof', it actually makes sense
yesterday we started the game with 21 players. normally that would mean it'd take 11 vote to fire and 11 to no fire, HOWEVER
if you look back, it only took 10 votes to no fire. this is because inffy, then probably being silenced, wasnt able to vote, hence causing us to need 1 less vote for a no fire.
Vote count:
Jolterino 1/11 - Jolterino
Sploorky 1/11 - uhtr5r
Iggish 2/11 - Ooglie, Comp
Danni 1/11 - Dess
HkCaper 1/11 - Arelic
With 21 players alive it takes 11 votes to fire and 10 votes to no-fire.
HKs vote proof is actually some very good evidence. It would with 21 players be 11 players needed for both a lynch and to no-lynch. However, Aqua said it took 10 players to no-lynch, and 11 players to lynch, and that means that it supposedly were 20 players in play. This totally match up with the Inffy being silenced theory.Often in mafia games, no lynch votes will require one less person than lynch votes in the case of an odd number of players. If your proof was that it was 10 people needed to no fire, then why did it still say 11 votes to fire?
Theres not much to add plus I'm waiting for Hk to either give us the name or for the other person to come forward themselvesNottykitten why are you agreeing with my posts but have not said anything regarding what Hk and I have been going back and forth on for the past page?
Look back at any other mafia game and youll know my proof is correct. Ive explained quite thoroughly now why this proof is better than me outing the other person.Often in mafia games, no lynch votes will require one less person than lynch votes in the case of an odd number of players. If your proof was that it was 10 people needed to no fire, then why did it still say 11 votes to fire?
Nottykitten why are you agreeing with my posts but have not said anything regarding what Hk and I have been going back and forth on for the past page?
Look: I don't think you are guilty because you claimed inf was silenced. I think the fact that you just will not give any more proof to this claim when it is so readily available just doesn't match up to your statement. If you are innocent, why do you trust your floor mate so much? Do you know something you can't tell us?