hey, want to see my jk impression? here goes:
I would like to state that it is my opinion that if I were to theorize on what could possibly be a potential lead, I would like to avoid the semi-weird "policy lynch" some people may have been suggesting in the day previous.
If you would be so inclined, I would rather the lynch be, if possible, on people who may have claimed town, as people who claim third party roles may potentially be allies to the town and are most likely trustworthy players from my perspective to side with if at all possible. Therefore, it might probably be my potential suggestion to vote for players claiming (most likely) ridiculously helpful town roles as they might possibly be mafia (or harmful roles such as possibly the inclusion of a third party serial killer or similar, but I sincerely believe that may or may not be likely to occur in the setup I have postulated we may have the potential to be playing) and therefore I believe we most likely should not lynch possible third party claims as that would probably not be most optimal from my personal perspective. While they may have the potential to possibly serve the town as a (somewhat useful) speculative buffer, if I were to give my personal opinion, it might be that I would say we (that is, the town) should probably lynch other claims that may not be as potentially useful allies of a sort to the town.
