What are you?Your brain forces you to choose, and thus, free will, according to timdood, would be nonexistant
That's just one of my theories
My belief is that the reason Baker would get angry over being punched is not due to personal experiences. If you were to raise Baker93 far away from society, without any influence, would he still not be angry by being punched? I think this is due to natural selection/evolution of our species. There's a deep rooted understanding of what's wanted and what's morally wrong.One fun perspective is that, You'd imagine due to there being no true randomness (outside of - potentially - 'Quantum Randomness'), this would validate the idea that there is no free will - only a outcome dictated by a cocktail of experiences/influences that - due to the complex nature of the influences & how they effect each other, is seemingly unpredictable. Another fun fact that could also validate that is - you'd note it is possible to guess someones decision when you know enough of the experiences/influences. For example I know that Baker93 would most likely be very angry if i punched him, because of personal experiences (Seeing fights occur, being in fights, upbringing, television, society tabboo on fighting etc.etc.).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feral_childMy belief is that the reason Baker would get angry over being punched is not due to personal experiences. If you were to raise Baker93 far away from society, without any influence, would he still not be angry by being punched? I think this is due to natural selection/evolution of our species. There's a deep rooted understanding of what's wanted and what's morally wrong.My belief is that the reason Baker would get angry over being punched is not due to personal experiences. If you were to raise Baker93 far away from society, without any influence, would he still not be angry by being punched? I think this is due to natural selection/evolution of our species. There's a deep rooted understanding of what's wanted and what's morally wrong.
I'm kinda sleepy right now so this may be irrelevant completely. I'll put some more thoughts of mine out later.
I'm kinda sleepy right now so this may be irrelevant completely. I'll put some more thoughts of mine out later.
I can see what you mean but " If you think it exists, you have it"Here's how I see it.
If you think it exists, you have it.
Everyone is different, and so they all have their own ideals. Ideals can be related to free will. You'd rather act this way because of how you see the world.
Not quite.I can see what you mean but " If you think it exists, you have it"
That's like saying "If you think an anvil will fall on poor Baker93's head. It will."...
Still. Your thoughts of free will are still bound to the real world in the form of physical consequences.Not quite.
His example is based in the imaginary world of thoughts while yours has its roots in the real world (anvils falling on Baker93).
Btw, I think we need to start paying security for Baker. People here don't seem to want him safe xD
What wouldn't fall on baker's head is the question.I can see what you mean but " If you think it exists, you have it"
That's like saying "If you think an anvil will fall on poor Baker93's head. It will."...
The debate asks a yes/no question, we cannot agree on either (agreeing on 'maybe' would be absurd). We're not here to agree or disagree but rather to state our thoughts and beliefs.this is like a religion convention where all the religions go and discuss shit and get into a big debate about who is right, but they all agree at the end of the day that there's a god