actually no, that's a lie. I did, but I felt Ltin was more of a potential candidate, so I didn't bring it up. Inf felt hunter was the most traitorous and yet didn't think to bring it up until some1 else did where he instantly jumped on the band wagon; which, to me, makes me think he didn't think of hunter being suspicious and saw this as a chance to get his traitor buddy out of the spotlight.^ Same argument applies to you Aqua.
That's really mean and highly unlikely to be true for any role except whatever the 3rd party is, because this is being presented to us as an open setup.b) Drunk is drunk, therefore possibly has a secret part to it's role that means it cant vote and/or cc.
So it's alright to say "oh yeah I didn't think he was suspicious BUT THEN I LOOKED BACK AT HIS POSTS!1!!!!".I didn't, I looked back and realised when quoting all his posts.
I'm listing possibilities. Honestly I think the top one is least likely and bottom most.That's really mean and highly unlikely to be true for any role except whatever the 3rd party is, because this is being presented to us as an open setup.
Uh hu. I remember a discussion about mafia wanting to claim civilian earlier?well that's a close deadline, gah
since y'all clearly can't take a hint, may as well claim
i'm a civ, you nuts
I did that once too.I'm listing possibilities. Honestly I think the top one is least likely and bottom most.
How?So it's alright to say "oh yeah I didn't think he was suspicious BUT THEN I LOOKED BACK AT HIS POSTS!1!!!!".
But when inf says "oh yeah I was suspicious all along, I just didn't feel the need to say it untill now", suddenly everyone loses their minds. Makes no sense to me.
except it's two entirely different concepts...?So it's alright to say "oh yeah I didn't think he was suspicious BUT THEN I LOOKED BACK AT HIS POSTS!1!!!!".
But when inf says "oh yeah I was suspicious all along, I just didn't feel the need to say it untill now", suddenly everyone loses their minds. Makes no sense to me.
My lynch priority as of now:except it's two entirely different concepts...?
one is supposedly having a suspicion but not telling anyone and proceeding to vote for the person who has been supposedly towntelling to them the entire time
the other is going back, finding suspicions and sharing them
But they're not.except it's two entirely different concepts...?
one is supposedly having a suspicion but not telling anyone and proceeding to vote for the person who has been supposedly towntelling to them the entire time
the other is going back, finding suspicions and sharing them
hey this wouldnt be the first time an innocent me and an innocent hunter have gone for eachothers throats in a mafia gameif hunter is proven inno then oog
"supposedly reading back"But they're not.
One is "supposedly" having a suspicion that you don't tell anyone about, and then voting them later when more evidence shows up.
The other is "supposedly" becoming suspicious of someone after "supposedly" reading back.
Both of which someone "claims" to be having a suspicion on someone. Either way kind of an useless argument I started.
I was suspicious of Hunter because of a gut feeling he was acting odd (AND THIS SOUNDS STUPID BUT MY GUT IS USUALLY RIGHT OK, I CALLED CAFF + JOLT AS MAFIA LAST GAME BASED ON GUT ALONE BUT KEPT QUIET). If I said, "hey guys I'm suspicious of Hunter", suddenly people would be like "why?" and I'd be like "gut" and they'd be like "bad excuse; HES MAFIA!" or if I was right Mafia would be like "INF IS COP KILL HIM!". If you look from my perspective it makes perfect sense (at least to me) why I kept quiet until Hunter does something anti-town and people begin voting him. The guy who I've thought as Mafia all day has basically confirmed to me that he's anti-town and people are voting on him. It's a chance to kill him instead of ltin, who I have townread. I voted them because if I didn't we would literally wait until the deadline and they would die anyway. Like I said, nothing was happening so I may as well have wrapped up the day.one is supposedly having a suspicion but not telling anyone and proceeding to vote for the person who has been supposedly towntelling to them the entire time
Thats because you fail to see the point of the argument <3"supposedly reading back"
I literally quoted like 6 of inffies messages from the past 4-5 pages... did you think I had them saved on multi-quote for a rainy day?
I'm sorry notty but that is one of the poorest arguments I've ever read.
Infected_alien8_ I recommed saying this aswell, it seems to have worked with one vote for Hunter!@people voting me
unvote unless you're gamethrowing, afk, or maf
maf wouldn't think you'd be cop if you said "gut feeling", that's a bad excuse for not posting. Also I know as a fact you are able to be more descriptive as you have when defending Ltin, so I'm sure if you did you wouldn't just say "gut feeling".I was suspicious of Hunter because of a gut feeling he was acting odd (AND THIS SOUNDS STUPID BUT MY GUT IS USUALLY RIGHT OK, I CALLED CAFF + JOLT AS MAFIA LAST GAME BASED ON GUT ALONE BUT KEPT QUIET). If I said, "hey guys I'm suspicious of Hunter", suddenly people would be like "why?" and I'd be like "gut" and they'd be like "bad excuse; HES MAFIA!" or if I was right Mafia would be like "INF IS COP KILL HIM!". If you look from my perspective it makes perfect sense (at least to me) why I kept quiet until Hunter does something anti-town and people begin voting him. The guy who I've thought as Mafia all day has basically confirmed to me that he's anti-town and people are voting on him. It's a chance to kill him instead of ltin, who I have townread. I voted them because if I didn't we would literally wait until the deadline and they would die anyway. Like I said, nothing was happening so I may as well have wrapped up the day.
Meanwhile, suddenly Hunter says "no im not mafia kill inf" and a bandwagon begins on me and everyone is acting like that is totally normal and that I'm suspicious because I defended an uncc cop.
If you guys need me to claim I will but it's best I don't for obvious reasons.
what?maf wouldn't think you'd be cop if you said "gut feeling", that's a bad excuse for not posting. Also I know as a fact you are able to be more descriptive as you have when defending Ltin, so I'm sure if you did you wouldn't just say "gut feeling".