Nightswood Infiltration [Game Over]
- Thread starter Enderfive
- Start date
- Status
Enderfive
sarcasm incarnate
Votecount (Suddenly, a new contender has emerged):
Timdood3 (3) - Vatumok, ShadeSlayer98, Kallie_S
Kallie_S (5) - Nottykitten, Fragile, CaffeinatedKitty, raxo2222, Timdood3
Fragile (1) - Ooglie101
With 17 players alive, it takes 9 votes to lynch and 9 votes to no-lynch. The day will end at 19:00 GMT on Thursday, 2 September. If no majority is reached by the day's end, the person with the most votes on them will be lynched.
Timdood3 (3) - Vatumok, ShadeSlayer98, Kallie_S
Kallie_S (5) - Nottykitten, Fragile, CaffeinatedKitty, raxo2222, Timdood3
Fragile (1) - Ooglie101
With 17 players alive, it takes 9 votes to lynch and 9 votes to no-lynch. The day will end at 19:00 GMT on Thursday, 2 September. If no majority is reached by the day's end, the person with the most votes on them will be lynched.
Well here's something happening now. Honestly, I feel more suspicious about shade and vatu(shade moreso) than kallie. They seemed more to be scrounging for a chance to lynch anyone for any exaggeratable reason. Kallie's also pretty suspicious, seeming to want to just lynch someone without thought. Since it's not likely that we'll get to lynching shade or vatu, I'll settle for lynching Kallie, though I won't vot eyet to see if we can get more from this day before the deadline.
Mooglie
The Local Cow
okay then
i, as a person who did not see the rulebreaking, believe you to be suspicious with your strong intent on lynching myself and notty for a situation that was quite clearly for comical purposes. your refusal to see this, despite having being told this several times by more than 1 person, leads me to believe that you have an ulterior motif behind the lynching.
does this satisfy you.
i, as a person who did not see the rulebreaking, believe you to be suspicious with your strong intent on lynching myself and notty for a situation that was quite clearly for comical purposes. your refusal to see this, despite having being told this several times by more than 1 person, leads me to believe that you have an ulterior motif behind the lynching.
does this satisfy you.
Fragile's moves are completely scum/weird so I have to assume that he is not town. Especially an ordinary townie should never behave like this. However, because there is still the option for a jester I'd say investigate him in the night and possibly lynch him tomorrow. Because he has such strong opinions I also would like to wait a day for if he actually is a town power role and misplaying a bit.
My vote for now still stands for Timdood3, although a lot of people have made theirselves suspicious. Again, I do not know for sure whether Tim is bad but he has shown pretty typical mafia behaviour (not randomly lynching anyone). It is also never bad to just try to vote for someone and see what the outcome is, who votes with and who votes against. My vote is subject to change if there comes a better option (IMO).
My vote for now still stands for Timdood3, although a lot of people have made theirselves suspicious. Again, I do not know for sure whether Tim is bad but he has shown pretty typical mafia behaviour (not randomly lynching anyone). It is also never bad to just try to vote for someone and see what the outcome is, who votes with and who votes against. My vote is subject to change if there comes a better option (IMO).
I'd still like you to cite this "typical mafia behavior" (bolded portions) since you didn't the first time I asked you to.
And the reason I quoted your whole first post instead of just the bolded portion (in addition to just not liking to take things out of context) is that, reading it back, it sounds very noncommittal (for uncommittal phrases, see italicized portions). Now, I've made a lot of accusations in such manners, but only as scum. But having done this, it makes it really easy to spot. The reason for doing so is that when the vote actually succeeds, and it turns out that I'm actually not bad, you can fall back on it and go "No, you see, I told you not to follow me, I wasn't very sure of it, etc."
*I'd also like to point out that you outright said lynching Notty is a better idea, and proceeded to vote me in the next line of your post.
I'm practically certain that you're scum. However I can't vote you this close to the deadline because it could easily lead to me having more votes than Kallie by the deadline. You can bet your ass though that my vote's going on you tomorrow.
And don't think I've forgotten about you being SK Notty
Feel free to investigate me, you'll find that i'm exactly what I've said I am: A townie with no special abilities. I am playing very hard to lynch people who I suspect are mafia, however I'm simply going to accomplish town's goal: Eliminating all threats. While being the heaviest power-player could lead me to be destructive to town at some point, for now everything that I'm doing is to help town.
Fruit
Brrraaaaaiiiinnnnsss
So much bandwagon.
I love how Vat said
Also Kallie, lynching does the town no good if they don't put any reason behind their vote. Your reasoning was basically "I'll vote for Tim just so we lynch someone".
I love how Vat said
And then two people followed him.
Also Kallie, lynching does the town no good if they don't put any reason behind their vote. Your reasoning was basically "I'll vote for Tim just so we lynch someone".
CaffeinatedKitty
Intoxicated Feline
How would you know if she is or isn't? You can't trust anyone in this game- unless you're mafia sticking up for a partner, of course. And if I'm not mistaken, it's her first game. People slip sometimes \O/
And honestly, trying so vehemently to defend her is putting you on the spot. If she turns out to be maf, it's almost guaranteed that you're on top of the list for possible partners.
And honestly, trying so vehemently to defend her is putting you on the spot. If she turns out to be maf, it's almost guaranteed that you're on top of the list for possible partners.
- Status