TBD [Status: GAME OVER]
- Thread starter GmK
- Start date
Votecount 5.27 - the morning afternoon
Alpha102 - 2 - Lee_Scar, Hunter27a1
Hunter27a1 - 7 - CoffeeKitty, myusername22, Duffie, nottykitten, Alpha102, Ooglie101, cooliorules
No-Lynch - 1 - 77_is_the_best
It takes 13 to lynch and 12 to no-lynch
Alpha102 - 2 - Lee_Scar, Hunter27a1
Hunter27a1 - 7 - CoffeeKitty, myusername22, Duffie, nottykitten, Alpha102, Ooglie101, cooliorules
No-Lynch - 1 - 77_is_the_best
It takes 13 to lynch and 12 to no-lynch
Votecount 5.27a1 - the still morning afternoon
Alpha102 - 2 - Lee_Scar, Hunter27a1
Hunter27a1 - 7 - CoffeeKitty, myusername22, Duffie, nottykitten, Alpha102, Ooglie101, cooliorules
No-Lynch - 2 - 77_is_the_best, raxo2222
It takes 13 to lynch and 12 to no-lynch
Alpha102 - 2 - Lee_Scar, Hunter27a1
Hunter27a1 - 7 - CoffeeKitty, myusername22, Duffie, nottykitten, Alpha102, Ooglie101, cooliorules
No-Lynch - 2 - 77_is_the_best, raxo2222
It takes 13 to lynch and 12 to no-lynch
Enderfive
sarcasm incarnate
We know the alignment claims of the four most suspicious people now, according to the majority. Okay, Hunter, that's all I needed.
My plan was to see what alignment Hunter would claim (although if you question my phrasing there, it was because I wanted to give him as little idea of my idea as possible). Then, depending on whether he'd claim town or third party, lynch either him or Alpha.
Here's why: now that all the four that have been under examination the most have claimed their alignments, we can choose a target to lynch out of those four. Notty and Hunter both claimed town, so common sense dictates that unless contradicting evidence or an actually solid theory declaring them guilty surfaces, we should leave them alone, therefore, I propose that Notty and Hunter both live another day. Now, Alpha and Duffie both claimed third party and they both claimed something that wouldn't directly harm town. So, how do we make the decision of who to lynch out of the two? Simple. We look at whose claim was more trustworthy. At this moment I find that Duffie's claim was more trustworthy, which leaves Alpha.
If you want a more detailed breakdown of my reasonings, you can ask for it, but for now:
vote Alpha102
My plan was to see what alignment Hunter would claim (although if you question my phrasing there, it was because I wanted to give him as little idea of my idea as possible). Then, depending on whether he'd claim town or third party, lynch either him or Alpha.
Here's why: now that all the four that have been under examination the most have claimed their alignments, we can choose a target to lynch out of those four. Notty and Hunter both claimed town, so common sense dictates that unless contradicting evidence or an actually solid theory declaring them guilty surfaces, we should leave them alone, therefore, I propose that Notty and Hunter both live another day. Now, Alpha and Duffie both claimed third party and they both claimed something that wouldn't directly harm town. So, how do we make the decision of who to lynch out of the two? Simple. We look at whose claim was more trustworthy. At this moment I find that Duffie's claim was more trustworthy, which leaves Alpha.
If you want a more detailed breakdown of my reasonings, you can ask for it, but for now:
vote Alpha102
Dude props for the gif!
Votecount 5.28 - the afternoon
Alpha102 - 4 - Lee_Scar, Hunter27a1, Ltin, endersteve5
Hunter27a1 - 6 - myusername22, Duffie, nottykitten, Alpha102, Ooglie101, cooliorules
No-Lynch - 2 - 77_is_the_best, raxo2222
It takes 13 to lynch and 12 to no-lynch
Alpha102 - 4 - Lee_Scar, Hunter27a1, Ltin, endersteve5
Hunter27a1 - 6 - myusername22, Duffie, nottykitten, Alpha102, Ooglie101, cooliorules
No-Lynch - 2 - 77_is_the_best, raxo2222
It takes 13 to lynch and 12 to no-lynch
Omg I swear. After reading the last few pages of hunters game style I want to lynch him 3 times as much just for the way he plays. Though I voted for him for the same objective reasons I voted for him first so I'm sticking with that.
Enderfive
sarcasm incarnate
The game is on. For my convenience, could you please briefly explain again your objective reasons for lynching Hunter? Do you think they are worth risking lynching a townie?
Harmless doesn't necessarily mean you benefit. Sure he could be numbers to the town, but he could also be numbers to the mafia (if someone doesn't backstab him for wanting to sleep, I'm still bitter about that)
He could also be going on the idea of "No idiot would claim third party, so logically, claim third party!".
Enderfive
sarcasm incarnate
And we're gonna play right into Mafia's hand if we keep thinking this way. Alpha hasn't been proven harmless, in fact, he hasn't been proven anything. I'll much rather lynch a third party claim who claimed in a highly suspicious manner, rather than a town claim who is only causing annoyance with his playstyle.
Ohh yea I guess. We haven't been nearly as active lately so it can't be too hard to catch back up can it? Also doesn't that kinda fall in the same category as using the in a conversation status rule? It might not be necessarily stated, but it could be changed.