TBD [Status: GAME OVER]
- Thread starter GmK
- Start date
This is true. I guess the real reason I'm not voting alpha is because I don't trust you. Basically though, this is my last time checking threadnbefore the deadline and Its late. Not gonnanmake a decision this late at night. Goodnight!
So going to try and congeal some thoughts into a post now that I have some time.
I may not be 100% out to lynch Hunter right now, but I would certainly prefer some sort of confirmation on whether Hunter is actually something near to what he says he is, otherwise his actions might be enough for me to go for a certain lynch of him tomorrow (e.g. could any other investigative role please try and do this.)
Yes I still agree that Alpha's claim looks false/rushed, and could potentially be dangerous because of his potential (though not guaranteed) lying, and I probably won't go against his lynching, though his claim is still as trustworthy as anyone else's claim so far.
Duffie worries me a bit. As I've watched him so far, he has been exuding a disturbing confidence throughout his most of posts, which may be explained by that he doesn't care if he dies or not, since *apparently* he doesn't need to be alive to win. This could make him dangerous if he lives, since he can play as a true embodiment of third-party, or rather chaos. And now I'm wondering if Duffie is some sort of player meant to try and keep as many third-parties alive, or if just happens to be related directly to Alpha =S
I could of sworn I had more thoughts but I just lost them ._.
I may not be 100% out to lynch Hunter right now, but I would certainly prefer some sort of confirmation on whether Hunter is actually something near to what he says he is, otherwise his actions might be enough for me to go for a certain lynch of him tomorrow (e.g. could any other investigative role please try and do this.)
Yes I still agree that Alpha's claim looks false/rushed, and could potentially be dangerous because of his potential (though not guaranteed) lying, and I probably won't go against his lynching, though his claim is still as trustworthy as anyone else's claim so far.
Duffie worries me a bit. As I've watched him so far, he has been exuding a disturbing confidence throughout his most of posts, which may be explained by that he doesn't care if he dies or not, since *apparently* he doesn't need to be alive to win. This could make him dangerous if he lives, since he can play as a true embodiment of third-party, or rather chaos. And now I'm wondering if Duffie is some sort of player meant to try and keep as many third-parties alive, or if just happens to be related directly to Alpha =S
I could of sworn I had more thoughts but I just lost them ._.
god damn it, myuser, you make NO SENSE AT ALL
can we get another person who is towny to vote
oh hey samlen by the way yes i can confirm if someone actually visits me and the deadline is in 17 hours
so please vote alpha now ok
can we get another person who is towny to vote
oh hey samlen by the way yes i can confirm if someone actually visits me and the deadline is in 17 hours
so please vote alpha now ok
I honestly don't know how much I should trust you before I have any sort of confirmation =S I will admit Alpha's fishy, but so have been your actions, so I'm slightly hesitant in just following you right now. I will make a decision before the day ends, and it does have a descent chance of ending with me voting Alpha, but I'd prefer to think a little more first.
Inb4 we're secretly the only townies among 5 or 6 mafia factions.
Not if they are competing factions
Are you serious?!
My catching up isn't an excuse to dodge anything. I actually have had a chaotic week of Chirstmas and still have relatives over who are staying up until New Years. Do not lynch me because I haven't said anything on DAY ONE. I thought I was allowed the time that GmK has given us to catch up and that's exactly what I'm doing. I'm on page 32 btw.
All of it will explained with pictures and gifs in one huge post.
I gave you my reasons, his claim is not very trustworthy, which in turns makes him potentially untrustworthy. But so is YOUR claim, it just seems a little bit much for one person. Which is why I'm still debating between voting one of you. Honestly, I'd prefer investigations on both of you first (dunno if it'd help for third-party) but I think I'll probably have to settle with getting only one of you confirmed.
Kk all I wanted to know! Nobody's trying to lynch you at the moment, relax. We just want to hear from you is all!
I said most toward the count on Alpha right now, including yourself. I don't believe your claim one bit. :c
Dammit, I don't wanna claim, and you won't make me. :V
Fine. Go for Alpha. Vote for him. It doesn't matter anymore, anyway. The problem's been fixed.
But you've been warned. :V