The Doomed Cruise - Game [OVER AND OUT ]

[Sploorky]

Oh, the amounts of suspicions thrown around.

Defiant_Blob I know you change your strategy every game, but what do you have to say about the obvious red flags on yourself you -know- you are putting up? You're riding the edge of the danger zone here, and I'm naturally suspicious. Even if you are town, your intentions come off as naturally shady this game, something I think you're playing up on.

Explanation for this?

 

[Enderfive]

K1ng, how exactly do we know the number of mafia and power roles the next day? Or which power roles are in the game altogether? I'd really like to know the logic behind that. Also, I'm thinking of voting myusername as well, because first: remember how I said a couple of pages ago I had a couple of hunches? The reason I didn't speak about them further was because I didn't really find anything solid on them. Funnily enough, they were K1ng and myusername. To find that someone else had this same hunch... it just makes me wonder if my hunch could be true. I'll look through myuser's posts once more and if I find anything at all, I'm voting.

 

[Defiant_Blob]

((OoC:I will reply soon. I'd like someone to tag all players that have not spoken asking them to speak up. As well, I
unvote

 

[Omar_Sales]

GmK I didn't vote for defiant_blob, just said I was suspicious. Just count me when I use the format :D

 

[myusername22]

I hold my ground when I said I'd vote for the next person that votes a No Lynch.
At first I started doubting if I'd go through with this. But not anymore.

I said in my first post I wasn't going to say wo my shot in the dark was incase I might make the mafia mad. But if people do that we don't have much discussion now do we =S. At that moment I didn't even really have a shot in the dark. But while reading throught the No Lynches people were voting, I just radnomly had the thought at one of them: "This person is mafia". And from thay moment I kept that in mind. I didn't say it however. Funnily enough, that person was Myuser. And now he voted No Lynch [again..] I feel a bit safer with voting him.

I might not have any proof other than a hunch. But this is the best I can go off.

Vote myusername22

I'd like to know more about why you and endersteve suspect me, I honestly don't understand why i look suspicious. this is my first season so it's possible i made a number of beginners mistakes, also i tend to think and talk in a slightly different way so I think this may be effecting my playing style.

to me this only reconfirms my point and therefore vote to myself though i'm not sure how much it will convince others,

we don't have enough evidence theirs not even a hint as to who could be the mafia at the moment.
suspicions seem to be flying every other way from each person voting so I feel we should move on to day 0

however I'm getting a rather strong hunch on Nottykitten because you've not only supported lynching people but threatened anyone who dared vote nolynch this looks very suspicious and very aggressive to me, like your trying to take complete control of the voting system.

again I would like to know why your suspicious of me? at first i was simply going to say it looked like you just listed me as a hunch to make it more convincing however since endersteve also apparently had a hunch I'd like to know more as to why you suspect me

 

[myusername22]

GmK I didn't vote for defiant_blob, just said I was suspicious. Just count me when I use the format :D

that's an easy mistake to make, if i'm correct you have that backwards defiant_blob voted for you. though it appears he just unvoted so the vote should disappear next vote count

 

[Enderfive]

Ok myuser, first you hopped on the no-lynch bandwagon because "the majority is doing it". Then you unvoted when those supporting a lynch got chatty and then you unvoted and (I think) switched back to no lynch. Not to mention that I myself and notty, who I honestly trust, had a hunch on you already.

vote myusername22

 

[Jeercrul]

I do not understand why there is all this fuss going on about. In my opinion, I do not understand why myusername appears suspicious to me at all. Neither do notty or defiant. I'm pretty familiar with notty's style so I understand that she always make flawed arguments jk notty it's the way she posts. Go through the previous seasons of mafia if you are confused. As for defiant, I already explained. Lastly, I do not understand why you, ender are jumping to and fro like a bunny.

Disorganisation is what the mafia is looking for. Get over yourselves instead of jumping bandwagons.

 

[Enderfive]

To and fro? I'm sorry, but I don't quite understand what you mean by that.

 

[Jeercrul]

To and fro? I'm sorry, but I don't quite understand what you mean by that.

I quite have a habit of making weird connections to irrelevant things :x
What I mean is that uh - CRAP I DON'T KNOW HOW TO REPHRASE.
I will be replying tomorrow. I need to rush my homework before I head off to bed. Which is pretty late now. Tomorrow.

 

[GmK]

GmK I didn't vote for defiant_blob, just said I was suspicious. Just count me when I use the format :D

Learn to read the voting overview, it was Defiant that voted on you

But that's moot now, since he unvoted, so, without further ado:

///VOTECOUNT///

Players needed to lynch: 16
Players needed to no-lynch: 15

No Lynch - 12 - digitalmez, shinyshark, grimmjowforever, K1ngHoward, infernofox, mariosatr, ansoro, kraby1, Prizyms, balloon98, HypeBurst, myusername22 (NL-3)
K1ngHoward - 1 - MarsKid (L-15)
myusername22 - 2 - nottykitten, endersteve5 (L-13)


Players not voting: Alpha102, Sploorky, Dessern5, Ooglie, storm, 77_is_the_best, hihihilolHI, Jivvi, Old_Man_Oak_63, Omar_Sales, One One Two, cooliorules, nitasu987, Defiant_Blob

 

[myusername22]

Ok myuser, first you hopped on the no-lynch bandwagon because "the majority is doing it". Then you unvoted when those supporting a lynch got chatty and then you unvoted and (I think) switched back to no lynch. Not to mention that I myself and notty, who I honestly trust, had a hunch on you already.

vote myusername22

thank you that explains everything,

many other people think no-lynch is the right way to go and I agree with them i think it's in the playing style a bit.
read through my posts more carefully i was never for a lynch I just noticed the No-lynch vote was getting pretty high and i felt i wanted the conversation (honestly would you not agree we've gotten a bit further 11 pages in rather than the (i think is was page 5 we were on)) to go on further. if this coincides near when those supporting a lynch got chatty i didn't notice But i felt there should be a timing to when the NOLynch executes and it just felt too soon,

I understand voting nolynch at first does look suspicious this was a mistake on my part for not thinking things out thoroughly enough. If i were trying to support a lynch wouldn't i have accused someone sooner or tried to further support a bandwagon? i never voted for anyone and I don't believe i ever really contributed to any bandwagons besides the no-lynch.

 

[Enderfive]

My vote still stands. If I vote I intend to keep it unless for a very good reason.

And grimm, I think I got what you meant. If you thought why I was jumping from one person to another in my statements about who I feel suspicious about, it was because I had many suspicions and I only posted those most relevant at the time for me or those that I simply remembered. I trust very few on this ship right now, and am suspicious of most others. Hope that answers your question.

 

[nitasu987]

Awwwraaaght naw I go' one darn good sushpishun on y'all yun' folks:

Nawhty: Looksh lahk wha' lotta shtuff peepah ah sayin' bout ya cou' be true. Ya seem lahk yo' mass campaignin' cou' co'relate to yer bein' one o' them mahfiers. Weeeel see!

Also:
Mah'usha: Ya actually dun' seem sushpechush to me becaushe the accusahun againsht ya ish from nawhty.

Endah: I ahgree with yer sayin' about all them statistiks an' wha' naw'.

MahshKeed: I ahgree we neetah git sum deshishunin' done 'round heer o' we gun be heer awhl yearh.

Translation:
Alright now, I have one suspicion at the moment:
Notty: Looks like what a lot of the stuff people are saying bout you could be true. You seem like your campaigning for Myuser since he revoted no lynch and his other suspicions in your opinion could mean that You are mafia because you're trying so hard to get one person voted out so you can take out two targets. We'll see!
Myuser: You don't seem suspicious to me.
Ender: I agree with your whole statistic thingy.
MarsKid; I agree, we need to get a decision so we don't rot in this crappy boat all year!

 

[K1ngHoward]

endersteve5

• How many Mafia?

• • We can find out the rough number by how many people do get killed. Sometimes the number of kills in the night can equal the amount mafia members. This can give us a rough total of the mafia members if it is more than 1 kill. Though if we are left with only one kill per night we can be given a rough timeline for how long we have before the mafia controls 25% of the votes (7 days if all goes well for the mafia, and we all chuck a man overboard every day)
• How many power roles?
  • Someone is going to come out with something if they find it, maybe not outright tell us since that would turn them into a target for the next night, but provide better hints and nudges. We can tell the difference with how they write compared to today. The story that we may get from kmg for who dies and is saved can give us information on if there is a doctor.
• Are there any power roles?
  • Again it comes down to if there is a story for each death and save that happens. It also comes down to if the sheriff wants to point fingers more often to where he discovered the mafia (it creates a huge risk for him since people are ready to blow each other's brains out at anyone who makes the first move [case in point Jivvi, Me, myuser])
• How many deaths per night?
  • Best case scenario is if the mafia as a whole only chooses 1 per night, but there is the possibility that there could be more deaths. Knowing the amount of kills per night will give us the advantage and countdown clock we need to try to take risks or become more attentive to who acts differently every single day.
• Will the mafia be meeting together before they kill?
  • This is answered by noticing who seems buddy buddy or who is avoiding each other since the mafia will probably try to disassociate themselves with other mafia members so they could seem inconspicuous and on different teams. This can become a large telltale sign though for who is working together or not. If we are given 4 kills a day that gives us the possibility that the mafia are not meeting together, but working individually since they each got a kill instead of a single one.

These questions overlap each other and rely on a few simple hints that can be given when someone is killed off in the night.

 

[K1ngHoward]

endersteve5
-snip-

Edit:

• How many Mafia?
  • I am just assuming that the number of mafia is 4 and that is where i got 7 days with one kill a night plus one kill a day.
• Will the mafia be meeting together before they kill?
  • This is also given if they only get a single kill a night which proves that they are working together on who to kill and can have more than one mafia member.

 

[hihihilolHI]

Ok, maybe it was like this... storm886 hihihilolHI

What? Oh I've been reading the thread, but haven't really had a reason to post. I'm just listening to the debate between the lynch/no-lynch people. I agree with some points from both sides, but don't want to vote yet.

 

[Vino]

THE BOuLDER thinks this entire thing might be a set-up. THE BOuLDER believes that this so called "Mafia" may not even be one of us. THE BOuLDER thinks the coward mafia should come out and fight like men. THE BOuLDER will now do pull-ups, deadlifts, and drink protein shakes.

 

[nitasu987]

(ooc): To fill in the gaps of boredom and arguing I call for more rp!

Awwwrighty tahm to sit 'round the aquarium and tell us 'bout yer background!

I wash born a poor boy on tha fahm, an' me paps wash a fahmer and me mah wash on o' them medicine girlsh fro' one o' them Native American Trahbs. We grew up nahs, bu' I wash lonely. Ah lef' tha' fahm when I wash 18 an' moved to Avalon, wheresabouts I've been fo' the pasht 35 yahrs.


Translation: Alrighty time to sit around the aquarium and tell us about your background!
I was boon a poor boy on the farm, and my dad was a farmer and my mom was one of those medicine girls from one of those Native American Tribes. We grew up nice, but I was lonely. I left the farm when I was 18 and moved to Avalon, where I've been for the past 35 years.D

 

[77thShad]

Ok, maybe it was like this... storm886 hihihilolHI

What? Oh I've been reading the thread, but haven't really had a reason to post. I'm just listening to the debate between the lynch/no-lynch people. I agree with some points from both sides, but don't want to vote yet.

Just letting you know, it is quite anti-town to not post your opinion or at all. Even that post was fine

 

[Alisha]

Well, where should we move from here?

There have been multiple accusations thrown out by various people on-board the ship, and I am starting to doubt that we will ever amass enough votes to throw someone overboard, especially as (roughly)one-third of us have already put in our votes for no-lynch.

 

[Vino]

Well, where should we move from here?

... throw someone overboard ...

THE BOuLDER feels like throwing someone overboard is too little. THE BOuLDER is strong and manly enough to swim accross the entire ocean and back to land if he had to. THE BOuLDER is even strong enough to get back on the ship if thrown off. THE BOuLDER believes a harsher approach to end our suspects should be needed. THE BOuLDER however realizes the mafia cowards who wont show their faces are not nearly manly enough to do such acts. THE BOuLDER thinks we should carry on. THE BOuLDER will now do push-ups, chin-ups, and a 18 mile sprint while drinking a mixture of nails and uncooked eggs.

 

[Vatumok]

I start to get the idea that endersteve5 and nottycat are mafia team (with possibly more members).
- I had already written them down as "possibly teaming".
- Ender's behaviour seems a bit suspicious.
- Now they are both voting for myusername.
Cannot say it with certainty, but if we were to take a shot in the dark I'd say one of them would be our best choice.

 

[nitasu987]

Ah Ahgree bu' If Ah hahta vo' fo' sumone Ah'd vo' fo' Notty.

Translation: I agree but if I had to vote for someone It'd be notty.

(This is because notty just seems suspicious to me because he/she (I forget, so sorry) is trying(?) to take charge and seems like he/she is trying to get what he/she wants so the if he/she is a mafia he/she'll be able to put them in a good position and take out a potential threat.)

 

[hihihilolHI]

Just letting you know, it is quite anti-town to not post your opinion or at all. Even that post was fine

It is? Oh Well I'd vote to lynch someone, because I don't think sitting around and waiting is beneficial. But I'd also like for the "investigator" roles (if there are any) to have a chance to give us a clue instead of randomly lynching.