The Economy of Madness - Game Complete!
- Thread starter Alisha
- Start date
- Status
—— Bimonthly Economic Update ——
Deadline: 22 April 2019 UTC 22:00.
Kroppeb - 5 (Aqua, Nottykitten, Omni, mariosatr, Infected_Alien8_) [B-5]Deadline: 22 April 2019 UTC 22:00.
Dess - 1 (Unusual_Dood) [B-9]
With 18 players, it takes 10 votes to bankrupt and 9 votes to no-bankrupt.
If no option reaches the required number of votes when a deadline hits, the day will end as a no-bankruptcy.
No you didn't. That argument relies on me having time, but you litterally less than 10 minutes from when I was trying to figure out HKCapers claim until you asked
So you only have one flawed example to bring up?
1) You didn't give me time to say it, and you are making quite direct conclusions on that.
2) The 'its obvious' part is about there not existing two body guards. It's not about my thoughts on Dess.
3) ^
Infected_alien8_
Garry's Mod Admin
I don't believe for one minute you didn't 'have time' to say it. If you truly thought you had a decent argument for Dess being scum I think you'd have said it in the time you made your other many posts. You made a total of 13 unique posts from the start of today. You first clarified your claim, then asked me a question about my reads list, then asked about hk's claim, then clarified your claim again, then said you think molten slipped or that hk is lying, then asked another question about hk's role, then asked molten a question about his claim, then asked another question about hk's role, then gave your thoughts on ltin/poke being blocked/jailed by concluding that ltin could possibly be SK and poke either SK or mafia and that if that's the case we might get 3 kills the next night, then commented on hk's claim again, then thanked me for the confusion ratings, then said ltin could be lying about being blocked and that you hadn't considered that, then asked notty if she thinks the mafia would block themselves. It was after that when I asked you about your read of Dess. If you're trying to tell me in all that time you didn't have time to make one comment about your read on dess then sorry but I'm just never going to believe that.
1) = made two quick responses to some alerts I got while I had the time (this was earlier on the day)
All the next posts happened within an hour
2) = just arrived at what I thought was a slip
3) = responded to an alert
4) = again commented on the slip
5) = started to get confused with HKs claim
6) = trying to figuring HKs claim
7) = still trying to figure out HKs claim
8) = introducing something interesting
9) = trying to figure out HKs claim
10) = still is confused over HKs claim
11) = answered a question regarding the interesting things I commented
12) = ^
You asked me less than 1 hour after I started with these posts (2-12). I prioritize new information and interesting things over reads so your argument here is that you're 'never going to believe' I had time to make 11 posts but not 12. You're not making any sense.
... posts within an hour.
Infected_alien8_
Garry's Mod Admin
You made 13 posts, I don't know why you're grouping the first two into one when they're separate posts
And why am I not making sense when you tell me you didn't have time to say your read on dess and that's the reason for it, when in reality you clearly did since you made 13 posts in the meantime, including reads on other people (hk, molten, ltin, poke)? Is it because you didn't have time or because you chose to spend your time on new information because they're two different reasons and you've mentioned the second only when I've called you out on the first
Like I said I prioritize certain things over reads and all of those 13 posts goes there. Your argument is basically that I had time since I made many posts, but I clearly didn't since I spent the time on making the posts.
They're not different reasons
Financial Analyst
Infected_alien8_
Garry's Mod Admin
fair enough. I do understand you might be going with the logic of 'I didn't have time because I spent it on other things' rather than 'I literally couldn't have had the time even if I wanted to' which is how I interpreted it the first time you brought it up but I wanted you to say it yourself and you have done so fair enough
(and I also no longer disbelieve that you'd think it was obvious and not worth mentioning the other stuff)
I'm still a bit sus of you but just for vibes mostly <3
(is there any point when we have have confirmed antitown and if Im lying I can be lynched next day anyways)
- Status