I'd agree with unu that Iggish is acting very suspicious. From my point of view it seems like Iggish is trying to get others to trust him by backing them. My theory is that Iggish is letting others lead the claim that someone is a mafia, and then supports to get them to trust him. So I think that Iggish is a mafia.
This would be agreeing with someone who you think is suspicious of being a mafia. I doubt a mafia would attack another mafia. I would like some examples of the people I'm trying to get to trust me. In my opinion, I haven't really been cosying up to anybody and have accused quite a few people, if anything, behaving in quite a hostile manner.
No-one else has really been leading a claim. I've been active in my distrust of inf and as a result have responded accordingly, attempting to get a potential mafia lynched. Now this is where it gets interesting for me. I called weak out for not talking much, half hinting that he might in fact be a mafia. Perhaps panicking that the spotlight might now be turning on him, he accuses his accusor of being mafia instead to draw attention away from him. In doing so, he is acting in the same way in which he thinks makes me mafia: agreeing with people, and then "letting others lead the claim that someone is mafia".
One point that really stands out to me is how he is now agreeing with unu who he thought to be very shady. In his post he didn't mention a lack of suspicion of unusual_dude when asked what his views are.
Another point which has to be valid is his lack of communication and participation in the game. He only answers when a question is directed his way and even then, he can take his time, perhaps deliberating his next move, quite mafia-esque.
Weak is quite content to let the game play out with no spotlight on himself for any reason at all, hence his sudden attack on his attacker (me) to direct the attention elsewhere.
I said that I was going to lessen my focus on inf and go after other mafia and it seems that I might have found a rabbit startled by the sudden headlights.
While I said weak is now suspicious of me because I attacked him, the more cynical of you we believe that I'm attacking him for him attacking me when I attacked him first.
I'll be interested in his reply...