Trouble in the West: Pirates vs Cowboys [Finished]
- Thread starter Prizyms
- Start date
- Status
Literally nothing has happened while I slept....Not much will be different tomorrow, so if we can't even make sense of each other today...how will we ever get through this game?
And could we stop blaming GmK for our drunkenness? It was only funny the first dozen or so times :s
And could we stop blaming GmK for our drunkenness? It was only funny the first dozen or so times :s
Wooooooo Weeeeeeee!!
One little statement on Timdood and everything blew out of proportion.
Of all those I find suspicious, I would have to say OMO. He backs me up and immediately votes for Tim? See something like that has me worried.
One little statement on Timdood and everything blew out of proportion.
Of all those I find suspicious, I would have to say OMO. He backs me up and immediately votes for Tim? See something like that has me worried.
I feel as if you are toying with me on purpose, capitalising upon basically nothing and trying to make a big deal out of it to try to get me lynched. Like, you're trying to unnerve me until I say something that you could point out as a "slip," and then use that to further convince people.
Sploorky
Member
Ah, but noone said that in the thread before him, if you view italics as 100% flavor text. You can make assumptions that that the italics point towards the mafia, but really can not know for sure...unless you are mafia.Says the person voting for someone for a statement he based on things other people had said in the thread before him
Notty and Swate were clearly RVS, with Swate being actually suspicious, and Fiesta is policy as a warning shot.
Of course I am intentionally playing like this, why would I unintentionally do these things?
I'll concede to the RVS stage, I don't play a lot of mafia games where it is common. I can understand the votes on swate, but I view oak as a far better choice. The votes on fiesta I view as utter bull. Is there more to it besides he acknowledged that there may be a vig...?
Ah right, that's all it was. ._. well I'm just going to attempt to be a normal player now after this fiasco, suspicion is apparently not a good thing in a game where people tend to die due to nothing more than pure suspicion and hunches.
That sudden vote on OMO was really something done in a hurry. @Swate care to provide a proper reasoning for that? I've reread through the past pages and you are just plainly bandwagoning.
Also unless you've provided me a convincing explanation,
Vote Swate
Also unless you've provided me a convincing explanation,
Vote Swate
Bah, I can't do anything without being patronised .-.
If you read through the last few pages, you'll see me getting increasingly agitated about the votes against me which irpnically were due to a bandwagon which you are now continuing.
Oak started that bandwagon, post 148, page 6 I believe, as Sploorky was. This, plus the fact that he said something that still appears to be an unexplained major slip up which Sploorky pointed out. If you read one of my last posts, which I'll quote right after I make this comment, I stated that I was sticking with a no-lynch for now butwas leaning towards a vote for Oak as he seems to be most suspicious to me for the reason stated above.
Realising that he started this stupid bandwagon against me finally tipped me off. I doubt I will change my vote unless something else comes up.
- Status