Blocktopia Mafia Season 7
- Thread starter Alisha
- Start date
- Status
Aight, here we go.
Right off the bat, I'll admit to jumping on the bandwagon to start with. I didn't really think it through. I just went 'Okay, he's throwing votes around and stuff. That isn't good" and voted for him. Probably the stupidest thing I've done all game. I decided not to properly go over it, because, I was getting sick of the quiet day, and wanted it to move forward. Then why nit say so, you ask? People vote for random people and say it's to wake them up, but even if that is true, everyone jumps on them like a kitten on catnip. I voted for super because I didn't want to stick out all over again. did it with Storm, and I was hoping like hell that he wasn't mafia, 'cause then I'd be next for sure .No one threw accusations at me, however, for whatever reason, and I turned out to be right: Storm only defense, in the end.
My position on the matter was similar to Hype's -
Back to this whole trust thing everyone, especially JK, is emphasizing that you can't thrust anyone. That's partially true. For a true understanding of where someone's loyalty lies, you must begin with an unbias, and remain with it until you reach your conclusion, as I did with Storm, but not, I regret, here. You must have that underlying suspicion of everyone at all times, but a small amount of trust in each, also.
Moving on to the claims of JK concerning the vigilante. I don't understand why any truly town-sided players would reveal their suspicions on the vigi's identity, especially such an experienced player who is obviously skilled at deducing people's roles. Unless he is not town-sided, which he is leading me to believe. For surely only a serial killer would be concerned by the vigilante at this early stage of the game, as serial killers are a team of one, ad have that same number of chances. The mafia, however, may know the vigilante, or even the serial killer, but they will surely kill them when the time is right. Because the serial killer and vigilante have only managed to kill one anti-town role out of the six that have been killed in the night. One of these was the doctor, who was targeted by both. When you think about it, why wouldn't the mafia let the vig and the killer stick around? Even the vigilante is doing more harm than good. Does this lead you to belive that the vigi is useless to us, and should be killed before he does an more damage, JK? You didn't quite elaborate on why. You merely stated that you believed that Notty was the vigilante, essentially throwing him under the bus, while throwing that glob of logic at me will likely turn all heads and get me lynched. As possibly the most frequent posters in this thread, Notty and I have provided a lot of insight into the day gone behind us. Is this something a townie is likely to want to risk, let alone lead the extortionist racket themselves? Yes, good people, that's right. I'm laying the suspicion on JKangaroo. Logic is not flawless. Make something idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot.
Why, JK do you want to expose the vigilante to the mafia and the killer and eliminate the two most frequent speakers of the game. Forget things not adding up right. This is just plain and simple suspicious, I mean, why would you even want to expose the vigi, besides the reasons above? You'll even have the vigilante themself on your back. Obviously no town-sided role would risk this. I would like to hear more from you, JK, and not one of your massive beating-round-the-bush piles of text. A shorter, concise reasoning on exactly why you've got it in for Notty and/as the Vigi. I am extremely suspicious of you now, JK, although I won't make the same mistake twice. I'm not voting for you yet; I would like to hear other opinions.
Apologies for holey logic, guys, if you find some
x3
Right off the bat, I'll admit to jumping on the bandwagon to start with. I didn't really think it through. I just went 'Okay, he's throwing votes around and stuff. That isn't good" and voted for him. Probably the stupidest thing I've done all game. I decided not to properly go over it, because, I was getting sick of the quiet day, and wanted it to move forward. Then why nit say so, you ask? People vote for random people and say it's to wake them up, but even if that is true, everyone jumps on them like a kitten on catnip. I voted for super because I didn't want to stick out all over again. did it with Storm, and I was hoping like hell that he wasn't mafia, 'cause then I'd be next for sure .No one threw accusations at me, however, for whatever reason, and I turned out to be right: Storm only defense, in the end.
My position on the matter was similar to Hype's -
We are like some kind of cult, we all lock our minds on one idea, anyone else has to die. This was what I was scared of; being pulled up for suppourting yet another guy who's under the hammer. And I didn't get bumped off for that, I'd surely get killed off once someone ends up to be the mafia. After it got quiet today, I slowed down too, and I haven't quite got back up to speed yet. I'm reading through again now, also smashing my head into my desk repeatedly, having made mistakes that could cost me my life here. I was still back with the morning wake-up when the afternoon goldrush started. I was still throwing around ideas, poking people with votes while others were reaching conclucions, and it's seems to have been bad for my health. Retracting my vote because I am stupid.
Back to this whole trust thing everyone, especially JK, is emphasizing that you can't thrust anyone. That's partially true. For a true understanding of where someone's loyalty lies, you must begin with an unbias, and remain with it until you reach your conclusion, as I did with Storm, but not, I regret, here. You must have that underlying suspicion of everyone at all times, but a small amount of trust in each, also.
Moving on to the claims of JK concerning the vigilante. I don't understand why any truly town-sided players would reveal their suspicions on the vigi's identity, especially such an experienced player who is obviously skilled at deducing people's roles. Unless he is not town-sided, which he is leading me to believe. For surely only a serial killer would be concerned by the vigilante at this early stage of the game, as serial killers are a team of one, ad have that same number of chances. The mafia, however, may know the vigilante, or even the serial killer, but they will surely kill them when the time is right. Because the serial killer and vigilante have only managed to kill one anti-town role out of the six that have been killed in the night. One of these was the doctor, who was targeted by both. When you think about it, why wouldn't the mafia let the vig and the killer stick around? Even the vigilante is doing more harm than good. Does this lead you to belive that the vigi is useless to us, and should be killed before he does an more damage, JK? You didn't quite elaborate on why. You merely stated that you believed that Notty was the vigilante, essentially throwing him under the bus, while throwing that glob of logic at me will likely turn all heads and get me lynched. As possibly the most frequent posters in this thread, Notty and I have provided a lot of insight into the day gone behind us. Is this something a townie is likely to want to risk, let alone lead the extortionist racket themselves? Yes, good people, that's right. I'm laying the suspicion on JKangaroo. Logic is not flawless. Make something idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot.
Why, JK do you want to expose the vigilante to the mafia and the killer and eliminate the two most frequent speakers of the game. Forget things not adding up right. This is just plain and simple suspicious, I mean, why would you even want to expose the vigi, besides the reasons above? You'll even have the vigilante themself on your back. Obviously no town-sided role would risk this. I would like to hear more from you, JK, and not one of your massive beating-round-the-bush piles of text. A shorter, concise reasoning on exactly why you've got it in for Notty and/as the Vigi. I am extremely suspicious of you now, JK, although I won't make the same mistake twice. I'm not voting for you yet; I would like to hear other opinions.
Apologies for holey logic, guys, if you find some
x3
Okay well this game is dying again.... I am still suspicious of super and I will decide to put my vote on him. (superstein) I just don't feel comfortable with him around for reasons I can't really put into words. Can't being I do not really know how to phrase them...
Nottykitten
Nomnomnom kitteh!
I'm having fun! And I think we should continue it.
It just seems like people are waiting for someone else to take action and vote. And if alot of people do that then nothing will really happen.
It just seems like people are waiting for someone else to take action and vote. And if alot of people do that then nothing will really happen.
I really hate to say this but I think we are going to need to lynch the quiet people. They are giving nothing to this game right now. Please either get active or I will take the initiative and vote for one of you.
Nottykitten
Nomnomnom kitteh!
With that said I'm just gonna go for it.
I don't see much suspicion in the talking people right now. And as I said before I think I should vote jeff, and thats what I'm gonna do. I Remove my vote on Superstein and then I vote for Jeff0521.
Woah woah woah I think we are progressing a little fast here.
However, I'm not going to vote to lynch one of the quiet people. Who knows that it is a chance to vote someone off without having a proper excuse since the person hasn't said anything much?
Nonetheless, please do contribute more to this thread.
However, I'm not going to vote to lynch one of the quiet people. Who knows that it is a chance to vote someone off without having a proper excuse since the person hasn't said anything much?
Nonetheless, please do contribute more to this thread.
Nottykitten
Nomnomnom kitteh!
Jeff supported dillon. You replace dillon. You support jeff.
If jeff turns out mafia, you will be the next lynched person. Because I am pretty sure you two are teaming.
That sounds so agressive..... xD
Exactly. We don't have a proper excuse since jeff hasn't said much. And then it's easy to say "theres no evidence on me". And that's exactly what is an easy thing to do as mafia. As people can't find evidence on you if you don't talk.
The real evidence here is the not talking. And the suspicious teaming of you two.
Sweet but rash assumption. Jeff supported Dill then. That is because they are close. You have to remember that. However, things are different now. I'm not going to support Jeff, and I will vote him off if he seems suspicious to me. My previous post wasn't in favour of anybody. However, it was pity for those who have not spoken much, and that includes digitalmez, jeff, and some others. I'm giving them a chance.
Another rash statement. Do you have ample evidence backing this up? Are you saying I am teaming with him simply because Jeff said that he supported Dill, and I told people not to vote to lynch others simply because they are quiet?
The reason why I stated this was because you were very quick to jump on your feet and point a finger at people. Firstly, you decided to lynch someone immediately. Next, you decided to threaten to vote me off if jeff turned out to be the mafia simply because I raised my suspicions at you taking the chance to vote a person off at the snap of the finger because he has not spoken much. It could be a chance to remove someone you deem threatening to your role without having a proper excuse. In my eyes, you seem really eager to call someone suspicious.
HypeBurst
Just Fabulous
I personally think the lack of progression in this thread is the reason why it is so inactive. Its like a cycle that gets worse and worse. Nothing is getting finalized so theres nothing to talk about, nothing to talk about means nothing gets said, and with more nothing being said, nothing gets finalized. And the cycle goes round and round and round
Nottykitten
Nomnomnom kitteh!
You mean, I will vote him once it is clear there is no way he will survive and I will look less suspicious by voting him. Atleast that is how I read that statement.
Yes... that is exactly what I am saying. Jeff seemed to support Dill. Sure, they are friends. But in mafia friends can be enemies. And you shouldn't support anyone based on relations. However you should try and support someone if they are in your team(mafia). And then ofcourse you saying "Woah woah woah" and "I'm not going to vote off one of the quiet people" which makes me believe you clearly don't want people to lynch jeff. Or other quiet people for that matter. Maybe if you two are mafia the last mafia is quiet too?
It's not really "immediately" as day 2 has been going on for a bit now, and I said before I suspected something between Dillon and Jeff and wanted to vote jeff. And yes, mafia is very threatening to my role. Or any role for that matter. Maybe I don't have a proper excuse. Maybe I am the contact and jeff is the cop. I pulled that one before ^_^. But yes, I think jeff is on an opposit team of my team. Make of that what you want. But my vote stays on a mafia member(jeff).
Notty, im getting very supicious of you and jivvi. You seem to know quite a bit that nobody else knows, and you made quite a rash assumption that because dillon supported jeff does, grim does.
You don seem like an idiot, but that was an idiotic statement. Almost like you were accusing him.
You don seem like an idiot, but that was an idiotic statement. Almost like you were accusing him.
Nottykitten
Nomnomnom kitteh!
What do I know that nobody else knows? And I am accusing him. Ofcourse only if jeff turns out mafia.
See how me making "idiotic" statements gets responses and gets people talking. \o/
Even a fool would know that making such statements would be knocking on Death's door for this one (Not as an insult :u)
To say that you are trying to make "idiotic" statements to get people talking seems more as an last minute excuse despite knowing very well such statements would make yourself very suspicious.
The thing is, what are you trying to get at?
- Status