Look one post above yours.If there are any miscounts/formatting errors. Please let us know!
Could you try and explain that 25% though?*grumble mumble* And to think I was getting my hopes up for a Day 0 lynch, I guess the tradition stays </3
OKAY ONTO MY NEXT FOS (75% hunch, 25% actual suspicion.)
vote The road to ruin
B- but Dessern5 and I are rebels! ;~;I would like to request both of you to use the voting format I supplied in the signups to make this much easier for me and alpha: Keep at least one blank line between your vote and the rest of your text. Thank you.
Votecount coming soon.
I agree with the point you make, though it sounds like you put every complicated word from the english language in there xDOne thing that bothers me, Ender, is you see all payers the same, when their personality and playstyle vary what is and isn't out if the ordinary. Oak, for example, might have pulled a brash gamble, but by looking at the possible outcome you can see that it was thoroughly thought through. Also, you're treating Iggy like you expect him to perform amazing loopidoops like Notty, despite his beginnerness, his basic grasp of how to play, and his simple mannerisms. I would not expect Iggy to research that deep into the flavour texts, and thus I have no qualms believing his confusion was genuine. Also, quit the Swate metaphors. Swate played Plane Troubles, and already had a grasp on how to play, in fact he may have been mafia in PT also. Retaking Rochester I could almost allow, what with the game being a monumental clusterfuck, but PT had a smooth learning curve, rather than dunking beginners in the deep end. If you look at RR, most of the new players conducted themselves in a similar way. In fact, the game was almost entirely dictated by Lee_Scar. Another thing that appeals to mafia plebeians is the illusion of immediate safety disguising a later danger, such as a swift no-lynched in favour of facing instant consequences exe thigh it may be
Lol yeah. It was still mighty fun. :)Retaking Rochester I could almost allow, what with the game being a monumental clusterfuck, but PT had a smooth learning curve, rather than dunking beginners in the deep end.
What is your stance on lynching/No Lynching. Like why lynch/No Lynch and why not the other?I think we all ought to give some people a slight leeway this game, a lot of newer players. Sure in the end we need to make informed (or as well informed as we can possibly make) decisions to succeed, even if that does mean coming down hard on a (possibly new) mafia.
Anyway I don't really have much to add at this point in time.
I can see both sides of the argument.What is your stance on lynching/No Lynching. Like why lynch/No Lynch and why not the other?
I tried to combine two different things in one sentence and failed. Meant to sayhigher chance to lose a town and kill a mafia
The quote I swear I could have seen was saying that no more members of the 05 should out (so it would just be Iggy in the open) but apparently I'm insane and that post never existeddd, nevertheless it was the more popular (and honestly sensible) idea at the time.I wonder if investigator's gain an understanding of roles when they investigate people, could be helpful to have any cops we may have lying around have a concrete target; though I'm not certain even if 05 is third party a multi-person serial killer faction it would be worth cashing our cop in.
I disagree with you here. I don't expect beginners to perform in the way that the more experienced players do. I allowed iggy the first mistakes he made. But it wasn't just one or two posts that were off, it was his entire play. I don't know what kind of a person someone is, if they have a basic grasp of logic or not, if they have a basic grasp of the game or not or if they do their basic research or not, but if a beginner's, and especially a beginner's entire play is off, then something must be wrong in my opinion. With Oak coming in to support Iggy's claim, I feel that his defense has been proven enough for me to be able to put it aside for the moment, but because of the possibility of Oak and Iggy both being mafia, I will also keep them both in mind and sight in case they turn out to be lying.One thing that bothers me, Ender, is you see all payers the same, when their personality and playstyle vary what is and isn't out if the ordinary. Oak, for example, might have pulled a brash gamble, but by looking at the possible outcome you can see that it was thoroughly thought through. Also, you're treating Iggy like you expect him to perform amazing loopidoops like Notty, despite his beginnerness, his basic grasp of how to play, and his simple mannerisms. I would not expect Iggy to research that deep into the flavour texts, and thus I have no qualms believing his confusion was genuine.
???Also, quit the Swate metaphors. Swate played Plane Troubles, and already had a grasp on how to play, in fact he may have been mafia in PT also. Retaking Rochester I could almost allow, what with the game being a monumental clusterfuck, but PT had a smooth learning curve, rather than dunking beginners in the deep end. If you look at RR, most of the new players conducted themselves in a similar way. In fact, the game was almost entirely dictated by Lee_Scar. Another thing that appeals to mafia plebeians is the illusion of immediate safety disguising a later danger, such as a swift no-lynched in favour of facing instant consequences exe thigh it may be
My point was the 05 group is claiming to be a town sided faction and we simply haven't confirmed that so I wanted us not to lynch iggy so the cop could learn more about a potential 3rd faction. I hadn't even considered the possibility of a mafia watcher, but I don't think the cop, the doc, or any watchers would have used their night roles on iggy simply on my say-so.I win when all threats to the town have been eliminated.ok so apparently I'm going insane and saw a post by Road which didn't exist ajnifank
either way, it was 1 of 2 quotes. The quote that I can find is~
The quote I swear I could have seen was saying that no more members of the 05 should out (so it would just be Iggy in the open) but apparently I'm insane and that post never existeddd, nevertheless it was the more popular (and honestly sensible) idea at the time.
Then, the only quote is the one I find the more interesting since if no more members of the 05 outed then it would be one particular person. If the cop had a 'concrete target' (Iggy) to try and figure out the allignment/role of the person it would easily allow a possible Mafia-sided Watcher to see who was visiting Iggy that night. The obvious thing for the possible Doctor to do at this point would be to protect Iggy since they would be the biggest target for the Mafia in my eyes meaning the possible Mafia-Watcher could get a 2 in 1 action to find out suspects of who the Cop and Doctor are. More people could visit and there would be more suspects making it harder to pin point the important duo but that would also allow the Mafia to know who some PRs are.
The idea does seem a bit overthinked but I shall let nothing slide *point*!
Alot of things have been said that I would have said, so other then to quote three to five people and just go 'I concur and I agree' I've been reading and watching giving time for others to read and reply.You were prevalent in (at the the end of) RR, what happened to that?
And has also given clear indication that he knows something that we don't. Or maybe doesn't care?I don't think, that Iggy is suspicious >.>