Any incriminating evidence to pin aqua as either town or mafia?
My investigation came back as innocent.
And now that I've said that I may as well do a full claim.
I've stated my name before, but I am Lubomir Kalyagin. I am a (town) Policeman. Each night I investigate a player and learn their allegiance in the morning. N1 (I think, I got it as soon as I replaced Fragile) I received 'flavor' (un-italicized lore) text stating that my work forced me to this town to fund my promotion (via bribe) and my potato-based diet. However, a certain one's death would cause me to reconsider. - End paraphrasing of text.
What exactly I'd be reconsidering I can't be sure. Reconsidering whether I want to bribe my way up? Reconsidering if I want to be a policeman at all? Reconsider if it's worth staying in this town just for a promotion? Honestly I have no idea. The possibilities I could come up with are: I lose my ability to investigate. I switch alignments and join the mafia (please not this one please). I 'die'/leave the town. All of these are bad. Now that I've fully disclosed the information regarding that, does anyone have anyone idea who my "certain one" whose death will cause me to reconsider might be?
Given Notty's/Partner's claim of Trainee Policeman+Head of Police I'm apt to think it's one of them, but I'd like peoples' input.
I am NOT Notty's partner (because I know you're going to ask)
N1 - I investigated Hunter because he plays very aggressively and I needed to know that he was playing for town and not for mafia. I received an innocent result. This was pretty much nullified by his templar claim confirming him, but at least we know I'm sane.**
N2 - I investigated Aqua (innocent result) because I thought he was noncommittally defending Jolt (in Hunter's words: "it looked like a bus").
To address suspicion of "If Notty claimed cop, and you're cop, why didn't you say anything lynch lynch lynch": I believe notty's claim. At least the role part of it, as I said in a recent post.
**Given that Notty and her partner get to be together, and I'm on my own, and we're all policemen (supposedly), I think it's possible that they're insane (because I'm proven sane from Hunter), giving legitimacy to myu's claim and damning 77. Which lines up particularly well with things given that 77 is the only one saying that myu's claim can't be real "based on what he knows." (Could be wrong about that last part I'm still confused on the whole visiting thingy things last night)
....@Hunter did I miss anything? Like do you have any questions or did I pretty much cover it?