You haven't proven my argument wrong what, you've claimed evidence (which I believe, I cba to look it up myself) that one of my reasons for voting him was wrong, he gave a more genuine response also making him seem less suspicious as well. I'm keeping my vote however, because in my opinion he seems the most suspicious.If I was going that much into detail in how I come across it would take a lot longer to write my responses, I'm literally just writing as I think, trying to make my point clear
And why are you still voting Mul if I've proven your argument wrong
You seem VERY keen on me removing my mul vote when it's not as if it's harming anyone...