then why didn't you give a reason along with the vote, like everyone else does?i don't agree
i wasn't reactiontesting you for what you'd say after you were voted for no reason, i was reactiontesting you for what youd say after you were voted
then why didn't you give a reason along with the vote, like everyone else does?i don't agree
i wasn't reactiontesting you for what you'd say after you were voted for no reason, i was reactiontesting you for what youd say after you were voted
.then why didn't you give a reason along with the vote, like everyone else does?
The reason is relevant. I didn't see the message ten minutes later giving your reason and you know I didn't see it as I repetitively asked you to give me reasons. If were only reaction testing me on how I would respond to being voted on and not how I would respond to being voted on with no reasons, why didn't you then give me my reasons?.
.
.
because the bloody reason was bloody irrelevant
i didn't have a grand master plan in mind when i made the vote, i just wanted to put pressure on you
Because the reason was irrelevant, he wanted to see your reaction to the vote, and if you didn't see his reason then for his reaction test to succeed he didn't then have to give you a reason, the test was just about how you reacted in generalThe reason is relevant. I didn't see the message ten minutes later giving your reason and you know I didn't see it as I repetitively asked you to give me reasons. If were only reaction testing me on how I would respond to being voted on and not how I would respond to being voted on with no reasons, why didn't you then give me my reasons?
Two households, both alike in dignity,Love you too bud <3
I am Romeo, I aint no girl. Might be a cloud, might be a corridor, but a girl... nah.Two households, both alike in dignity,
In fair Verona, where we lay our scene,
From ancient grudge break to new mutiny,
Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean.
From forth the fatal loins of these two foes
A pair of star-cross'd lovers take their life;
Whose misadventured piteous overthrows
Do with their death bury their parents' strife.
The fearful passage of their death-mark'd love,
And the continuance of their parents' rage,
Which, but their children's end, nought could remove,
Is now the two hours' traffic of our stage;
The which if you with patient ears attend,
What here shall miss, our toil shall strive to mend.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...................Because the reason was irrelevant, he wanted to see your reaction to the vote, and if you didn't see his reason then for his reaction test to succeed he didn't then have to give you a reason, the test was just about how you reacted in general
Meanwhile HK I love you
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...................
Enderfive [2] - Enderfive, HKCaperVOTECOUNT ...
ooglie101 [1] - Nottykitten
Enderfive [1] - Enderfive, HKCaper
With 11 players it takes 6 to lynch and 6 to no lynch.
Well my dear friend, I know that this is TWG's first game and therefore I'm not expecting anything too special from him. And from what I've read so far many of his posts were quite random and confused me but I didn't pick up anything suspicious just him saying what he wanted to say. I didn't read Aqua because nothing he said really had any point? And I mean my attempt at getting a lynch on you Involved really didn't have a strong argument and he just jumped on it, that's why I voted him over TWG was because he was too easy to be swayed almost grasping at any choice he could. Furthermore, I no longer Town Read TWG because of his post 'guaranteeing' Aqua was mafia, don't know if this was a sneaky strat or not so I am suspicious of him (but I am suspicious of everybody rn)Also Foggy2406 when you're online I'd like your reasons for town reading TWG and why you didn't town read or scum read Aqua please
So you didn't find the fact that he wanted to lynch me, someone he town-read, so that when I flipped innocent we'd lynch iggish, suspicious? Why not?Well my dear friend, I know that this is TWG's first game and therefore I'm not expecting anything too special from him. And from what I've read so far many of his posts were quite random and confused me but I didn't pick up anything suspicious just him saying what he wanted to say.
I swear you guys had the same argument though?, didn't you? If so, if you could see that Aqua wasn't making sense, did that not make you see that you, too, weren't making sense?I didn't read Aqua because nothing he said really had any point?
But TWG said that yesterday, which was before you said you town-read him?Furthermore, I no longer Town Read TWG because of his post 'guaranteeing' Aqua was mafia, don't know if this was a sneaky strat or not so I am suspicious of him (but I am suspicious of everybody rn)