Emoji Mafia - Completed
- Thread starter Prizyms
- Start date
- Status
I would agree this was a good time to claim. Perhaps if :Shades: had made an effort to persuade town at the end something could have been done with this claim earlier, but now we have even more info with the 2 blocks and no night kills.
This screams over-reacting in my opinion. Even if you are actually a villager, it could still be possible that :Blush: blocked you. Eitherway you look at this, this seems like a post made because you panicked.
Could be possible, but a villager claim in a closed setup is kinda weak.
Bonus quotes:
(not much significance just thought it was kinda funny)
I also want to adress some other players.
:Thinking:
- His posts seem calm and rational. He makes some good commentary on what is going on in my eyes and it feels like he at times is steering the thread into certain directions (or atleast tries to), altough I can not exactly define how. On the surface feels like a town player, worth keeping an eye on though (as possible sneaky scum or disguiser target).
:Yum:
- Seems like he goes with the town flow. Sided with :Blush: pretty much right away. Rationally he seems town and contributes a lot, but gut feeling tells me something is off. Both days info comes forward which accelerates the thread into a certain direction. While today has offered us more info to work with and keep in mind for following days, like with :Shades: yesterday, the focus has been on :Weary: and votes followed fast. It is possible :Yum: has taken advantage of this so definitely worth keeping an eye on as well (similair to :Thinking: as sneaky scum or disguiser target).
:Mask:
- Did not offer to much of a perspective this day, besides agreeing that :Weary:'s reply to :Blush:'s claim was over the top. After that joined in on the :Weary: vote and has not said anything since. Too little to make a definite judgement, but lowkey suspicious.
:Unamused:
- Not too fond of their initial response to :Yum: and :Blush:, then again he makes a fair point
:Thinking:
- His posts seem calm and rational. He makes some good commentary on what is going on in my eyes and it feels like he at times is steering the thread into certain directions (or atleast tries to), altough I can not exactly define how. On the surface feels like a town player, worth keeping an eye on though (as possible sneaky scum or disguiser target).
:Yum:
- Seems like he goes with the town flow. Sided with :Blush: pretty much right away. Rationally he seems town and contributes a lot, but gut feeling tells me something is off. Both days info comes forward which accelerates the thread into a certain direction. While today has offered us more info to work with and keep in mind for following days, like with :Shades: yesterday, the focus has been on :Weary: and votes followed fast. It is possible :Yum: has taken advantage of this so definitely worth keeping an eye on as well (similair to :Thinking: as sneaky scum or disguiser target).
:Mask:
- Did not offer to much of a perspective this day, besides agreeing that :Weary:'s reply to :Blush:'s claim was over the top. After that joined in on the :Weary: vote and has not said anything since. Too little to make a definite judgement, but lowkey suspicious.
:Unamused:
- Not too fond of their initial response to :Yum: and :Blush:, then again he makes a fair point
Something :Thinking: said makes sense, which makes me inclined to believe his claim
Looking back he also seemed to have taken the lead on the :Shades: lynch. His course of action today seems similair to yesterday's. If :Weary: flips mafia I will lean towards town reading him, if :Weary: flips town I will lean towards scum reading him.
Eitherway I do believe a :Weary: lynch is the way to go. On the other hand I would really like to hear from everyone if they received an item or not. I did not receive an item (I believe some have already said). I will not vote just yet to prevent the next post from being a hammer.
yeah yum appeared to have followed me on that one. i think i deserve some of the blame for being the first to accuse shades (and was partially wrong on one thing but admitted to it), but i didnt vote for a while. yum was pretty quick to vote and has reiterated some of my thoughts, so ive got my eye on them
plural
the search system doesn't recognize it unless it's the word exactly, apparently
Expressionless
Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2018
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 2
no item
i think the item was given to a mafia member whos being silent about it, i feel a townie wouldve told us already if they received an item
i think the item was given to a mafia member whos being silent about it, i feel a townie wouldve told us already if they received an item
Expressionless
Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2018
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 2
which probably means itemgiver should claim, might want to do it tomorrow for reasons stated above
Hearts
Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2018
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 10
No item either
Angry, no item
Blush, no item
Expressionless, no item
Halo, no item
Hearts, no item
Joy
Mask, no item
Sob
Sweat
Thinking, no item
Unamused, no item
Weary
Winking
Yum, no item
Joy, Sob, Sweat, Weary, and Winking haven't specified, unless I missed something earlier.
Blush, no item
Expressionless, no item
Halo, no item
Hearts, no item
Joy
Mask, no item
Sob
Sweat
Thinking, no item
Unamused, no item
Weary
Winking
Yum, no item
Joy, Sob, Sweat, Weary, and Winking haven't specified, unless I missed something earlier.
Expressionless
Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2018
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 2
i kind of just assume when we were going around claiming if people had items, the people who didnt claim just didnt have an item and didnt feel the need to specify that. thats why i said nothing
Got anything else to add?
i will once i’m caught up with the thread, yeah; once again, i have woken up to an influx of posts
- Status