Shadow_Hunter3
Shadow_Hunter3
because okx did not speak at all this game, and Ernie is in a utc+10 zone so he was probably asleep.why were you So quick to vote ok but suddenly resistant to voting Ernie
because okx did not speak at all this game, and Ernie is in a utc+10 zone so he was probably asleep.why were you So quick to vote ok but suddenly resistant to voting Ernie
yes but that still doesn't really make any sensebecause okx did not speak at all this game, and Ernie is in a utc+10 zone so he was probably asleep.
and then when someone votes ernie you suddenly stop and say lets wait guys it's just oddlike okx could be very busy or have irl stuff things and you voted him willy nilly when alisha votes him?
hmm
I'd probably kill fantome as of now
I'd hug(possibly eat) chocofox cuz who doesnt like chocolate
and I'd avoid alisha cuz I dont wanna get added to her laundry list of lynches
I've encountered this behavior in another game with him (he was town), so following people might be his playstylelike okx could be very busy or have irl stuff things and you voted him willy nilly when alisha votes him?
I voted him because he did not post a single message this game, which is running over 2 days already. where as ernie did post something.like okx could be very busy or have irl stuff things and you voted him willy nilly when alisha votes him?
What don't you think adds up about it?MoltenAshes is vibing weird to me now becauses his reasons for voting inactives aren't adding up
He said that fantome might be useful but seemed to think an inactive like okx had no chance of being town, it felt illogical to meWhat don't you think adds up about it?
I think you might have misinterpreted this post maybe?He said that fantome might be useful but seemed to think an inactive like okx had no chance of being town, it felt illogical to me
Read the "Ernie has no chance of that" in terms of 'that' being "likely try to be cooperative in lynches", that's how I interpret it at leastI'm saying that there's at least a small chance that Fantomes town. If he were, he would most likely try to be cooperative in lynches. Hoeever, Ernie has no chance of that if he's inactive.
He said that fantome might be useful but seemed to think an inactive like okx had no chance of being town, it felt illogical to me
one is about okx and one is about ernie? think a bit of miscommunication is happeningI think you might have misinterpreted this post maybe?
Read the "Ernie has no chance of that" in terms of 'that' being "likely try to be cooperative in lynches", that's how I interpret it at least
Not when he was being lynched no, but I think molten's basically saying that if we have two people and both could be town or mafia then he'd go for the inactive since even if they're town they can never be helpful, but at least fantome can be helpful and help lynch people as a townie if he is town, and I think that's what he meant by cooperativeOh okay maybe I did read that wrong, sorry
I still stand by that fantome wasn't cooperating when he was being lynched though
If Fantome was actually town, he has proven active enough to help in future lynches.
Ernie's inactivity could be a trend, and even if Ernie was town, it's possible he wouldn't help in future lynches.
I guess she was generalising his statement to include all inactives not just ernie, and so said 'inactives like okx'? I didn't actually notice she even said okx until you just said it though woops but looks like it didn't matterone is about okx and one is about ernie? think a bit of miscommunication is happening
I didnt see she said "inactive like", thought she just meant okxI guess she was generalising his statement to include all inactives not just ernie, and so said 'inactives like okx'? I didn't actually notice she even said okx until you just said it though woops but looks like it didn't matter
makes more sense now xdI didnt see she said "inactive like", thought she just meant okx
it's okay with our powers combined we can read a full sentence sort ofI didnt see she said "inactive like", thought she just meant okx
I vote to try to get reads on people, and get Ernie to be active in this chat. If he responds anywhere near an appropriate answer, I'm removing the vote.Some of my thoughts for today:
You previously said you'd prefer a no-lynch over a lynch:
Is inactivity sufficient to warrant a vote from you onto Okx and later Ernie but not enough to warrant your vote on Les (Fantome?)
what someone else said*I'm rethinking fantome again now since his push on shadow felt too eager to fit into my theory about being burnt by the last game, so if that's not true then why was he so uncharacteristically passive earlier on
Speaking of which I can see why he did push on shadow but I don't find it particularly compelling myself and can see where shadow would have been coming from as town there too since voting okx is a very clear 'vote the inactive' movement but with voting ernie, who had already spoken, I can see why that might be less clear that it's an inactive vote, and him repeating what someone else isn't something I think makes him scummy necessarily