I don't think I scumread MoltenAshes (Wyatt) because of that - I think he's just being cautious and he did say about no-lynching earlier on and the reason being him voting Okx and Ernie was to get them to talk. His behaviour just seems consistent to me.
Infected_alien8_
Garry's Mod Admin
Yeah, he did say:
But then afterwards he said
so I thought it turned into an 'okay this person does seem like scum now so I'm no longer only voting to get them to talk', so I'm interested in what made him seemingly change his mind
I'm saying is that Tim is asking questions in a manner that makes me think that he's town.
oops my bad, I meant that I don't think the mafia would put that much attention and pressure on another mafia member, especially if they're this new to forum mafia.
(I KNEW someone would point this out)
yeah I agree, but with all respect when I feel like it's not worth noting, it really isnt
I did clarify it. Maybe to put it a bit more direct (i was being vague to avoid accidently spoiling info) if anyone has a 'partner(s)' they are known to them, and unless i messed up the game mechanics are exactly as stated on the wiki.
Some times when a player asks question they are done in a quantative way which makes it necessary to respond in a quantative way back, and when respond in a quantative way, the chances for someone misspeaking is higher.
I feel like tim isn't acting like it's a police interrogation - he's more after the information.
I don't like voting on day 0.
However if you really think we are scum shouldn't you at least try to show some sort of pursuit? I'm just really confused as to the passiveness with the read here especially since you seemed pretty sure about the reads in the initial post.
Questions that are genuine after information & not just to call out the response for whatever they say.
I'm a radical no-lyncher on day 0.
"Can you give an example of the latter?"