The Happy Vice Institute - Game Complete!

[Mooglie]

so basically the flavor is, 'i go out and have a good time with someone'
i guess i keep them 'occupied', but at the same time keep them safe from harm

occupied while you steal their items, item stealer

anyway
2 protection roles in a game where theres a role with a bulletproof vest (hey thats me) and only 1 kill per night

also hk is literally claiming hooker if not item stealer (roleblock, sleazy, 'take out to have a good time')

 

[HKCaper]

also hk is literally claiming hooker if not item stealer (roleblock, sleazy, 'take out to have a good time')

no im claiming jailer, just my flavor is kinda sleezy

hey if you dont want to believe me thats fine, not much i can do about things that happend now can i

 

[HKCaper]

We're locked in a facility you harlot

prude

 

[Mooglie]

Comp
JurgenVW
MacTarvish
@any of the other inactives ive forgot

CLAIM AS SOON AS YOU SEE THIS MESSAGE
IF YOU DO NOT CLAIM WITHIN 36 HOURS YOU WILL BE LYNCHED

 

[Infected_alien8_]

see i agree at face value hk's claim is sus for like all the reasons oog said

but at the same time WOULD HE REALLY MAKE THESE CLAIMS AS SCUM and think he can get away with it (wow its wifom the thing oog loves)

so idk im conflicted

 

[Mooglie]

Comp
JurgenVW
MacTarvish
@any of the other inactives ive forgot

CLAIM AS SOON AS YOU SEE THIS MESSAGE
IF YOU DO NOT CLAIM WITHIN 36 HOURS YOU WILL BE LYNCHED

Good Skele

 

[HKCaper]

see i agree at face value hk's claim is sus for like all the reasons oog said

amen brother

WOULD HE REALLY MAKE THESE CLAIMS AS SCUM

wifom is prtty crisp

 

[Mooglie]

see i agree at face value hk's claim is sus for like all the reasons oog said

but at the same time WOULD HE REALLY MAKE THESE CLAIMS AS SCUM and think he can get away with it (wow its wifom the thing oog loves)

so idk im conflicted

im just conflicted about why would lie about not getting an item (since in the world where he is mafia blocker he still should have gotten it?)

 

[HKCaper]

im just conflicted about why would lie about not getting an item

i know the answer (hint, i didnt get an item)

 

[Nottykitten]

Maybe HK is the real protection role and Weak is a cultist???

 

[Infected_alien8_]

im just conflicted about why would lie about not getting an item (since in the world where he is mafia blocker he still should have gotten it?)

yeah i was thinking about that too

my only idea was 'he's mafia and think he'll look super townie for saying such suspicious claims (since people might wifom read him town) and so he added that on there just to make it even more 'suspicious' and therefore 'surely not scum'

 

[HKCaper]

If I die that night or get lynched the following day, that person's role will get publicly revealed. I'm presently on HK Caper.

see we can also lynch stranger, and that will prove me

(for legal reasons that's a joke)

 

[Mooglie]

my only idea was 'he's mafia and think he'll look super townie for saying such suspicious claims (since people might wifom read him town) and so he added that on there just to make it even more 'suspicious' and therefore 'surely not scum'

ya he did a similar thing with his claim last game, saying that he could be in rooms alone and stuff

 

[Mooglie]

Maybe HK is the real protection role and Weak is a cultist???

but hip and inf confirm him giving them shields

THIS MAKES NO SENSE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

 

[HKCaper]

ya he did a similar thing with his claim last game, saying that he could be in rooms alone and stuff

not that it relates to this game,

but in hindsight i should have left that out of the claim. i didnt even realize people would fuzz over that. EVEN THO EVERYONE WAS WRONG ABOUT IT CUS ANYONE COULD BE ALONE IN A ROOM AND SURVIVE.

 

[Nottykitten]

but hip and inf confirm him giving them shields

THIS MAKES NO SENSE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

For all we know both Inf and Hip are already turned!

 

[HKCaper]

twg just hit me with the 'sad' rating, and honestly, i felt that

 

[Nottykitten]

Infected_alien8_ can you re-read your role pm to make sure it doesnt say visitors get the same item as you give out

 

[Infected_alien8_]

Infected_alien8_ can you re-read your role pm to make sure it doesnt say visitors get the same item as you give out

it does say that, i said that from the start

 

[Mooglie]

i cannot lie i literally cannot understand what happened
2 protective roles
both claim to have visited the same person
one claims to have been given an item from visiting that person
the other claims to have not

in my mind this situation would make sense if hk is town and his block stopped people from receiving the items even if they did visit, so twg is lying, but twg's action is confirmed both night 1 and night 2

its not like an item stealer could have visited hk since why would they visit someone who openly claimed to have received 0 items + my items all disappeared last night + it would still theoretically appear in his inventory

i DONT UNDERSTAND THIS MAKES NEGATIVE SENSE

 

[Nottykitten]

it does say that, i said that from the start

But then if you were roleblocked you gave nothing out so visitors would get no item?

 

[Mooglie]

But then if you were roleblocked you gave nothing out so visitors would get no item?

but hipmeow has suggested that on nights where he doesnt give anything out, visitors still receive items (him questioning why mulb didnt visit him last night)

 

[TheWeakGuy48_]

From memory Alisha has always liked to have multiple protective roles in their setups, although I don't really trust HKC but I'm still on the edge however

 

[Nottykitten]

but hipmeow has suggested that on nights where he doesnt give anything out, visitors still receive items (him questioning why mulb didnt visit him last night)

Thats why I asked for specific wording that indicates visitors get the item he gives to someone else

 

[hipmeow]

look just lynch mul and if they are maf then hk is pretty much proven unless another person claims to be roleblocker ive solved this entire situation thank you