Infected_alien8_
Garry's Mod Admin
no the alignment thing was part of their 3p claim, that they get told if they succeeded in giving out a penalty to scum or not
so i assume shes just claiming innkeeper/blocker/vote-stopper now
[GAME OVER] Formula Mafia
- Thread starter Ltin
- Start date
so i assume shes just claiming innkeeper/blocker/vote-stopper now
why are you not comfortable voting notty
in your theory
4/6 people are scum, and notty is in there
even if notty is town we surely have one mislynch to spare and can have a game where all mafia are ID'd no matter what
in your theory
4/6 people are scum, and notty is in there
even if notty is town we surely have one mislynch to spare and can have a game where all mafia are ID'd no matter what
i wish i could quote that agree rating
so
stranger lied about checking notty's alignment but allegedly did perform a vote block?
but the vote block failed because notty claims to be immune
which is weird if there really are no alignment tricks going on
so
stranger lied about checking notty's alignment but allegedly did perform a vote block?
but the vote block failed because notty claims to be immune
which is weird if there really are no alignment tricks going on
Infected_alien8_
Garry's Mod Admin
don't feel confident enough to justify lynching just yet when i have stronger suspects
it was 4/8
because in that case the immunity is strictly limited to penalties such as vote blocking and not, say, alignment inspections?
or would notty be immune to Boo's ability too
so we have notty with an immunity to a vote block AND alignment investigation, two separate abilities carried by two different people instead of two abilities wrapped into one person
notty sounds like an extremely important scum role
Infected_alien8_
Garry's Mod Admin
well according to boo their penalty thing is strictly flavour and she doesnt actually need to give our penalties in order to carry out her role
so so far, if we assume that to be true, the only thing nottys immune against that we know of is stranger's block/vote-stopping thing
and notty explicitly claimed to be immune to penalties, right
Boo claims the term 'penalty' is cosmetic
notty claims to be immune to the term 'penalty', which is not cosmetic
one of these must not be true
Infected_alien8_
Garry's Mod Admin
well stranger also claims penalty isnt cosmetic
so either
boo is lying about it being strictly flavour (but shes uncc cop)
notty and stranger are lying about their penalty aspect of their role (actually, Stranger from Planet 9 can we get confirmation that your penalty thing isnt strictly flavour, since if it is then notty is prob lying)
or penalties are both flavour and real things depending on the role
The penalty is not cosmetic. My night action should have prevented Notty from voting for Alisha.
I would say Booo's statement that penalties are purely cosmetic is a lie.
How salty I am about how I always seem to get mislynched d1.
Key word being 'explicitly', my dear Notty. That was a relevant point in that entire exchange, especially after Skele voted me.
Nottykitten
Nomnomnom kitteh!
Tbh Stranger could of probably gotten me lynched if they said it was cosmetic so this felt like a very town-like statement. I'll vote for the neighbour then since two inns is indeed suspicious.
Unvote
Vote Skele
Good Skele
Member
So a regular inn looks more suspicious to you than the inn that puts two people in a chat and blocks a vote of a one on another? I might not know a lot, but this doesn't make lots of logical sense to me
