Why do I get the feeling you took this reasoning from... perhaps Mafia Lite v1?
Anyhow, I do not believe this line of reasoning is perfect in very much essence, and thought it was kind of resolved earlier in previous posts, primarily due to the debate between Defaint and myself, but as well as the actions of others, including yourself, Mr.
theodorre, who almost went along with Mr. Dessern's theory. As well as the Misters, Vati and Sploorky, who appeared to bandwaggon at the chance to lynch me.
Should we return to the lines of events that brought us here?
1) Dessern's theory of the doctor saving the zombie, due to some mistaken circumstances that occurred the previous night.
2) Dessern's accusation of my personal being, and the grouping of other players to lynch me.
3) Alpha's restating and clearing up any misconceptions due to his story-line going over the previous night's events.
4) Following Dessern's, as well as the townsfolk's retraction of their statements, and apologies due to a false lead.
Does it appear that anything is going wrong up to this point? For me it does, as I was the primary target. However, again, this line of reasoning was quickly neutralized due to Alpha's comment, so balance was regained in this deceitful game we so call "Mafia." After this, there were at a stalemate, as we were uncertain what process or line of thinking we should follow, or if we should lynch a townsperson at all. I see nothing here that puts us both in the same category of players, i.e. the Mafia.
Shall we continue with the events?
5) We discussed some things about real life Mafia, and possible Mafia killing due to playing on the same server.
6) Marn votes for Dessern, with no evidence or argument to be seen yet!
7) It is here that Defaint states there is something "off" with Dessern's argument, and proceeds to give some of his ideas on the matter.
8) We battle, rebutted against each other's arguments, and etc.
9) Here, in our present situation.
It is only recently, that this idea that Dessern is apart of the Mafia as sprung up. In fact, it was suggested by Mr. Bonshon, if not the hippo, Marnixxie himself if he had discussed his line of reasoning before the blobby-Mr. Bonshon.
Acutally, I want to bring something up seeing the timeline on what has passed.
What argument exactly? Dessern has not conceived any ideas as of late, primarily because of Alpha's statement clearing up the affairs. Actually, Dessern, from what I have seen in the statements he's made, simply explained how he came to the consensus that I was one of the Mafia, but knew he was wrong due to Alpha's explanation.
Because of this, why would I need to desperately defend Mr. Jack(Dessern), if in actuality, there was nothing to use against him after these occurrences with Alpha cleaned up? I also do not see how I am tied into a team with Mr. Jack.
Infact, he, and I should have actually seen this quote beforehand, as it does, in my opinion, clear a moderate amount of this man's name.
If I was correct, and I am still hoping I was; I was, and still am, defending an innocent man.
I will remain in a
NO LYNCH vote and state until evidence can sway me otherwise.
With that in mind, I will be looking forward to
Marnixxie 's argument that Dessern should be the one to be lynched off with bated breath, for then I may change my voting decision, or remain with the prospect I have chosen for now.
~With such, Cromnwell bows, tipping his hat.~
In such
